Canada judge strikes down assisted suicide ban

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
BBC

British Columbia's Supreme Court has struck down a portion of Canada's criminal code that bans physician-assisted suicide.

Justice Lynn Smith ruled that preventing doctors from helping critically-ill patients to commit suicide was unconstitutional.

She suspended her ruling for one year for new legislation to be drafted.

The ruling also gave permission for Gloria Taylor, one of five plaintiffs, to seek doctor-assisted suicide.

Under the ruling, if Ms Taylor, who has amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or Lou Gehrig's disease, must do so within the year if she chooses.

In her 395-page ruling Ms Smith argued that suicide itself was not illegal, and therefore the ban denied the physically disabled the same rights as people who could take their own lives, breaking Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

'Watershed decision'

A spokeswoman for the British Columbia (BC) Civil Liberties Association told reporters the ruling was a "watershed decision".

She also read a statement from Ms Taylor, who said she was "deeply grateful to have the comfort of knowing that I'll have a choice at the end of my life".

"This decision allows me to approach my death in the same way I have tried to live my life - with dignity, independence, and grace."

Government officials had argued during the court hearing that assisted suicide would run counter to basic societal values and the will of parliament.

Will Johnson, chair of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition of BC, called the ruling a "radical decision" and said it disregarded evidence of harm in places where assisted suicide was legal.

"We are extremely concerned about the situation of elder abuse which is a major issue in Canada," Mr Johnston told CBC News.
 

paullud

Veteran Expediter
Canada seems to be making more of a move toward personal liberties. They will start getting Free Staters to move up there.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums
 

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
Canada seems to be making more of a move toward personal liberties. They will start getting Free Staters to move up there.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums


I personally do not see a problem with the premise of assisted suicide, as reported if the disabled terminally ill could commit suicide on their own they would - suicide itself is not illegal.

The problem, IMO, arises when there could be suspicion surrounding the "assisted suicide".

If they addressed that area, I'm sure a lot more Countries would follow.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Canada seems to be making more of a move toward personal liberties. They will start getting Free Staters to move up there.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums

Have to remember Canada has only had a Constitution since 1967...so there is still a lot of defining what Canada should be and the direction it will take....even more challenges in the future. Now being out from under Crown rule...who knows what direction the country will really go....
 

paullud

Veteran Expediter
I personally do not see a problem with the premise of assisted suicide, as reported if the disabled terminally ill could commit suicide on their own they would - suicide itself is not illegal.

The problem, IMO, arises when there could be suspicion surrounding the "assisted suicide".

If they addressed that area, I'm sure a lot more Countries would follow.

It is definitely a tough call to make but I would like to see it boil down to living wills or the family members wishes. We had to make the call for my dad to be pulled off the ventilator which we knew would end his life, I'm not sure why that is OK but letting them OD is wrong.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums
 

paullud

Veteran Expediter
Have to remember Canada has only had a Constitution since 1967...so there is still a lot of defining what Canada should be and the direction it will take....even more challenges in the future. Now being out from under Crown rule...who knows what direction the country will really go....

We changed our direction a few times early on, now we do it every couple of years.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
We changed our direction a few times early on, now we do it every couple of years.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums

But overall are all the changes creating a better way of life for regular Americans....is the country moving forward, backward or stagnating?
 

paullud

Veteran Expediter
But overall are all the changes creating a better way of life for regular Americans....is the country moving forward, backward or stagnating?

Ragman answered that question well, it all boils down to beliefs. Given my beliefs I would say the country is moving backward and letting the government control our lives again.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
Ragman answered that question well, it all boils down to beliefs. Given my beliefs I would say the country is moving backward and letting the government control our lives again.

Again? We haven't been free since Coolidge. Even then, we were controlled by the un-elected tyrants of the Fed.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Ragman answered that question well, it all boils down to beliefs. Given my beliefs I would say the country is moving backward and letting the government control our lives again.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums

Well....I believe there will always be "some" control issues with government...I think it is more of "how much" control they have would be the concern... "limited" government would be good....
Canada is really only 45 years old, where it can make it's own decisions and laws, I believe there be even more small movements away from the government over future generations....as you see all these small cases are trying to push government out of peoples lives.....less control and the government trying desperately to maintain the control....
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Government by it's very nature becomes more and more overbearing as time passes. Given enough time every government will become oppressive. No government is immune. It is happening here and, in the fullness of time, happen in Canada.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Government by it's very nature becomes more and more overbearing as time passes. Given enough time every government will become oppressive. No government is immune. It is happening here and, in the fullness of time, happen in Canada.

Thing is Joe...Canada is just emerging from the clutches of crown rule, like you say "subject" thinking.....I think "in time" not our time, you'll see Canada moving further to center....
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Thing is Joe...Canada is just emerging from the clutches of crown rule, like you say "subject" thinking.....I think "in time" not our time, you'll see Canada moving further to center....

Canada may move more center for a time, then as all countries do, will come full circle and your government will become oppressive.

What is all the trouble up there with the government taking private property? I see signs about it all over up there. That would be oppressive. The gun laws and anti-hunting junk is putting people out of business, that is oppressive to them. Government is government. They are evil by nature.
 
Top