RE the poll: these are three false premises.
(1) McCain's incarceration as a POW qualifies him for nothing except gratitude from the nation. Not a valid choice.
(2) It's become evident with the passage of time that Barack Hussein Obama's recitations of speeches written by David Axelrod accomplish nothing but the excitement of hard core left-wing democrats and naive college students. This is also not a valid option.
(3) We're screwed - no, we've survived the Carter, Ford and Johnson administrations. We'll survive a McCain administration; however, an Obama administration would bring with it the most liberal and unqualified president in the history of the country. The damage he would do to would be worse than that of Carter, and the recovery would be much longer.
My vote is for none of the above.
I really don't understand the term unqualified president here...Bush was just a governor,,( a bad one at that) and a mediocre at most business man through Bush seniors friends. Probably the Greatest President in the last 100 years was a Govenor and actor. Reagon....Question being did eather one have more government experance??? In Congress or Senate?..The clown in white house now is far more unqualified. Remember Iraqi oil was suppose to pay for the 10 billion per week it cost for their war..yea right
And that great thinker in the White House and the his Puppet that is running for president now...I wonder why didn't they just go after Bin Laden in the first place, capture destroy his gang then go after Iraqs oil. Instead open two fronts get nothing done but six years of death, destruction,one heck of tab for this mess and still Bin Laden is on the lose.....Not to smart there....
His war, his bail out, that is what is going to destroy us among other things.Great Job George..