Beginning of the End? Canada to withdraw from Kyoto Protocol

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
BBC

Canada will formally withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, the minister of the environment has said.

Peter Kent said the protocol "does not represent a way forward for Canada" and the country would face crippling fines for failing to meet its targets.

The move, which is legal and was expected, makes it the first nation to pull out of the global treaty.

The protocol, initially adopted in Kyoto, Japan, in 1997, is aimed at fighting global warming.

"Kyoto, for Canada, is in the past, and as such we are invoking our legal right to withdraw from Kyoto," Mr Kent said in Toronto.

He said he would be formally advising the United Nations of his country's intention to pull out.

'Impediment'

He said meeting Canada's obligations under Kyoto would cost $13.6bn (10.3bn euros; £8.7bn): "That's $1,600 from every Canadian family - that's the Kyoto cost to Canadians, that was the legacy of an incompetent Liberal government".

He said that despite this cost, greenhouse emissions would continue to rise as two of the world's largest polluters - the US and China - were not covered by the Kyoto agreement.

"We believe that a new agreement that will allow us to generate jobs and economic growth represents the way forward," he said.

Beijing criticised Canada's decision. Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Liu Weimin said it went "against the efforts of the international community and is regrettable".

Mr Kent's announcement came just hours after a last-minute deal on climate change was agreed in Durban.

Talks on a new legal deal covering all countries will begin next year and end by 2015, coming into effect by 2020, the UN climate conference decided.

"The Kyoto Protocol is a dated document, it is actually considered by many as an impediment to the move forward but there was good will demonstrated in Durban, the agreement that we ended up with provides the basis for an agreement by 2015."

He said that though the text of the Durban agreement "provides a loophole for China and India", it represents "the way forward".

Canada's previous Liberal government signed the accord but Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government never embraced it.

Canada declared four years ago that it did not intend to meet its existing Kyoto Protocol commitments and its annual emissions have risen by about a third since 1990.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
The Kyoto Protocol is a joke, anyway. For Canada, if they remain a part of it, the 13.6 billion is in Kyoto fines, paid to the UN. In order to meet the emissions requirements, Canada would have to remove from all roadways "every car, truck, ATV, tractor, ambulance, police car," or, having to close down "the country's entire farming and agricultural sector and cutting heat to every home, building and factory." For the US, we'd have to do all that combined. And there are countries around the world who would love it if we had to do that.

The Kyoto Protocol committed major industrial economies to reducing their annual CO2 emissions to below 1990 levels, while providing financial supports to developing nations to encourage them to follow suit eventually. The Kyoto Extension (The Durban Platform agreed to on Sunday) includes the first contributions to a $100 billion Green Climate Fund to help developing countries to invest in clean energy and adapt to climate change (which is a fancy way of saying the rich are subsidizing the poor, and creating a handicap for the rich in the process).

Most developing countries have no problems at all meeting the 1990 levels, since the level aren't necessarily by country, but by regional averages. In effect, the major industrial economies have to scale back production and emissions, while at the same time paying developing countries so they can increase production. It's a redistribution of wealth, and jobs, and has been a large part of why the world economy is in the shape it's in today.

The US signed the accord, but has never ratified it. Japan and Russia also refused to sign the Kyoto Extension after they saw what was happening.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Why is it that with all of this concern of CO2, the UN and these countries who want to limit CO2 to make an agreement that will not be binding without in-fighting to a place that produces the very thing they say that causes the CO2 in the first place. I bet the carbon foot print of the Dubai vacation for these guys is greater than most third world countries' on any given day.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Why is it that with all of this concern of CO2, the UN and these countries who want to limit CO2 to make an agreement that will not be binding without in-fighting to a place that produces the very thing they say that causes the CO2 in the first place. I bet the carbon foot print of the Dubai vacation for these guys is greater than most third world countries' on any given day.

Do as they say, not as they do. They are the "elite". They are just looking out for the "little man" who is helpless with out them.
 
Top