At it AGAIN!

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The "peaceful people" of Iran are at it again, attacking another embassy. This time it was the British embassy.

The "thug arm" of the Iranian government, radical students, pulled of this latest stunt just as they have in the past. Diplomacy is a waste of time with this bunch.


Iranian students storm British Embassy in Tehran​

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Hard-line Iranian students stormed British diplomatic sites in Tehran on Tuesday, bringing down the Union Jack flag, burning an embassy vehicle and throwing documents from windows in scenes reminiscent of the seizing of the U.S. Embassy compound in 1979.

The mob surged past riot police into the British Embassy complex — which they pelted with petrol bombs and stones — two days after Iran's parliament approved a bill that reduces diplomatic relations with Britain following London's support of recently upgraded Western sanctions on Tehran over its disputed nuclear program. Flames shot out of a sport utility vehicle parked outside the brick building.

Demonstrators outside the embassy also burned British flags and clashed with police as the rally, which had been organized by student groups at universities and seminaries.

Less than two hours later, police appeared to regain control of the site. But about 300 protesters reportedly entered a residential complex for staff in another part of the city and replaced British flags with Iranian ones. The British Foreign Office harshly denounced the melee and said Iran has a "clear duty" under international law to protect diplomats and offices.

"We are outraged by this," said the statement. "It is utterly unacceptable and we condemn it."

It said a "significant number" of protesters entered the compound and caused vandalism, but gave no other details on damage or whether diplomatic staff was inside the embassy, although the storming occurred after business hours.

In Washington, the White House issued a statement strongly condemning the attacks and saying Iran has an obligation to protect foreign embassies. The U.S. broke off diplomatic relations with Iran during the embassy siege in 1980.

The semiofficial Mehr news agency said embassy staff had left the compound before the mobs entered, but it also said those who occupied the area had taken six staff as hostages. It did not give their nationalities and the report was later removed from the website without elaboration.

The protesters broke through after clashing with anti-riot police and chanting for its takeover. "Death to England," some cried in the first significant assault of a foreign diplomatic area in Iran in years. More protesters poured into the compound as police tried to clear the site.

Smoke rose from some areas of the embassy grounds and the British flag was replaced with a banner in the name of 7th century Shiite saint, Imam Hussein. Occupiers also tore down picture of Queen Elizabeth II.

Protesters called for the closure of the embassy calling it a "spy den" — the same phrase used after militants stormed the U.S. embassy in Tehran after the 1979 Islamic Revolution and held 52 hostages for 444 days. In the early moments of the siege, protesters tossed out papers from the compound and hauled down the U.S. flag. Washington and Tehran have no diplomatic relations since then.

The rally outside the British Embassy — on a main street in Tehran downtown — included protesters carrying photographs of nuclear scientist Majid Shahriari, who was killed last year in an attack that Iran blamed on Israeli and British spy services.

In a northern part of the city, the official IRNA news agency said about 300 protesters entered a complex used for embassy staff and other officials.

Britain's Foreign Office said it was in contact with embassy officials. Officials were still checking on the well-being of workers and diplomats, a spokeswoman said on condition of anonymity in line with standing policy.

It also warned its citizens in Iran to "stay inside and keep a low profile."

Tensions with Britain date back to the 19th century when the Persian monarchy gave huge industrial concessions to London, which later included significant control over Iran's oil industry.
But they have become increasingly strained as the West accuses Iran of trying to develop nuclear weapons — a charge Tehran denies.

In recent years, Iran was angered by Britain's decision in 2007 honor author Salman Rushdie with a knighthood.

Rushdie went into hiding after Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini issued a 1989 fatwa, or religious edict, ordering Muslims to kill the author because his novel "The Satanic Verses" allegedly insulted Islam.

The decision shortly after Iran detained 15 British sailors and marines in March 2007 for allegedly entering the country's territorial waters in the Gulf — a claim Britain denies. The 15 were released after nearly two weeks in captivity.

In 2006, angry mobs burned the Danish flag and attacked Danish and other Western embassies in Tehran in protest to the reprinting of a cartoon deemed insulting of the Prophet Muhammad in the Nordic country's newspapers.





Iranian students storm British Embassy in Tehran - Yahoo! News
 

clcooper

Expert Expediter
atleast they didnt try to take your guns from you because you will just hand your guns right over to them.

did you read why they did what they did ??

so those people standing up for what they believe in is wrong but you will shoot anybody try to take your guns from you .

yep they pass a law and the people are just to sit and follow they law weather they like it or not . will you just sit around and follow them when the outlaw your guns
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Now it's coming to light that these "students" are actually members of the basij militia - the same government minions that were dispatched to attack the Green Movement protesters in 2009.
The attack was no impromptu happening. Police stood by, and Iranian state television broadcast events live. By some strange reflex, Western media insisted the attackers were "students." To Iranians who know better, they were the basij militia, the regime's first line of defense. These thugs were called out to brutally put down the 2009 Green Revolution, a genuine student-led uprising.

The assault was no doubt revenge for Britain's decision to impose financial sanctions in the wake of the recent U.N. report on Iran's nuclear-weapons program. Iran's parliament voted Monday to expel the British ambassador, MPs chanted "Death to Britain" and issued threats against the U.K. embassy. Twenty-four hours later, the basij arrived.

Elder of Ziyon: Confirmed: "Students" at the British embassy were Iranian militia
Apparently these latest European sanctions on the Iranian banks are getting their attention. Now if only the US would join in freezing the Iranian central bank assets we might have some sanctions imposed that actually have some teeth.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
That's nothing. The "peaceful people" of America are at it again, too attacking another country's military bases. This time it was Pakaistani bases.

The "thug arm" of the America government, the military, pulled of this latest stunt just as they have in the past. Diplomacy is a waste of time with this bunch.

Depends on your point of view, I suppose.
snort.gif
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The entire story of that attack in Pakistan has yet to come out. There are reports out that the "taliban" may be partly to blame.

Embassies are unarmed for the most part. Not a valid comparison.

Maybe we should start going after embassies in Washington.

Just as when they attacked our embassy in '76. They used "students" to attack an embassy.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
So the US military was duped by the Taliban?

Happens a lot in war. This one, and every past war that has ever been fought. Nothing new.

The lone report I heard, I have yet to even have a chance to try to confirm it, stated that the Taliban had "fighters" near that check point and started firing on U.S. troops in the area. The troops then called in air support.

Just as the "Taliban" has "dressed" in "friendly uniforms", attacked civilians, and then blamed the U.S. Our "free press" is not very good at sorting out these stories or correcting thing that they report wrong.

I here the same story from every person I have ever spoken to who has fought over there.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
If you dig into the American Embassy situation a bit, you will find that it wasn't all that the people were told about.

In this case, the Brits cut banking ties with Iran and this triggered a bunch of stuff. As for not being armed, I think that's not true. I also think that they had fair warning that this was about to happen and no one took it seriously.

By the way, I have to ask - should we come to the rescue of the Brits and start a war?
 
Top