Yeah, someone will let you know.I'm sure someone will let us know the correct number if that isn't it.
They use the EIA Website, but it's always for the previous week's average, good or bad. Last week the EIA average was $3.33. It's currently $3.407, and that's what Panther will use beginning next Tuesday, even if the EIA average next week is lower.
Panther has a contracted rate per mile with its contractors. If the contracted rate for a cargo van is 77 cents, then that's what it is. The load offer will state your contracted rate, and it will also state what the FSC is for the load. If the FSC for the load is 19 cents, then the load pays 19 cents plus your contracted rate of 77 cents, for a total of 96 cents per mile.When Panther or Tri-State quotes you a rate for a run do they include the FSC in the load? Another words making the rate lower??
I have no idea. I don't know what "it" is. A lot of loads that Panther books are off bid boards where they are all-inclusive bids, where it's X-dollars for the load. For those loads, Panther artificially breaks out the contracted rate and the FSC and presents them like normal with the load offer. If they bid a load that they're going to pay me 95 cents to run, the load offer comes across as 77 cents plus an 18 cent FSC.Just curious if this is just a broker deal or if the company's are also doing it.
The question I have is this: Should people in a vehicle like that always expect the higher rate, even when hauling freight that would fit in a cargo van? I've always operated on the model that the rates are for the type of load, not the type of truck that a load is going into. If a large straight truck is hauling a two skid cargo van load where a dock high truck is not retired, that driver should expect the cargo van rate for that load, unless the carrier was lucky enough to get a straight truck rate for the load. When I was leased to another carrier in my Sprinter, I got van rates for van loads and a higher rate for loads that required the Sprinter. I didn't expect to always get the Sprinter rate even when I was hauling a van load, and I also didn't expect to always be hauling Sprinter freight. I just don't think it's reasonable to expect to always get the higher rate, or to only haul the larger loads and expect to stay as busy. What do y'all think?
Charles, I sympathize with you.
You are between a rock and a hard place.
It can be so hard to keep everyone happy and not have them think you are screwing them when in fact you are trying to help them by trying to keep them busy. Then if you don't offer them the loads at all because you know they will not run for the regular cargo van rate, they will then think you are trying to screw them by not keeping them busy.
Myself personally, if I didn't want to do the load I would just turn it down, however because my situation could change from day to day, I would still want to be offered the regular cargo van load runs as well, as what I might turn down today, I might not turn down tommorow, if I needed to get closer to home or a better freight area or whatever. So why would I want to limit my options?
I believe that the rate should reflect three things.
a) it's urgency
b) what size of vehicle it will fit on.
c) special handling requirements
I would not and neither should anyone else expect a higher rate based on the vehicle they are driving. The rate should indeed reflect what vehicle the freight will fit in. If I am driving a cube or straight, and decide to take a regular van load, I should expect to get the van rate. Some people have an attitude, and that attitude definitely seems to inflate exponentially based on the size of vehicle they drive.
Yes we all know the costs involved to operate each class of vehicle and as was mentioned, if they don't like it they should just turn it down. But I know as a business person myself, I would still want the option of making that decision to take it or wait based on any number of factors in play at that time, but I shouldn't feel insulted for being offered it, nor should you feel guilty for offering it.
Some people are born complainers and think the world owes them a living, and quite honestly, since the barrier to entry in this business is quite low, that is unfortunately the type of people it will sometimes attract.
Charles, I don't know you personally but I have read enough of your posts on here to know that I believe you operate your business professionally, and do try and keep everyone happy.
I'm sure you try and communicate with them as professionally as possible, but maybe you might want to "educate" them a little more on why the loads are offered the way they are.
I don't mean you have to justify to each o/o on every load, I mean maybe have a general information session for everyone about the how's and why's load offers are the way they are and hopefully it might make a difference in a few of the attitudes.
It sounds like your business is starting to grow to the point where you are becoming a baby sitter!
There is cheap freight, then there is cheap freight relative to what you are driving, and some people apparently don't know the difference.
Best of luck in getting them to understand that.
What many don't really, truly understand or care to understand, is the competition in your business. As a result of your collective "don't wannas", "standards", etc, You are actually cutting of your nose to spite your face. Many shippers alert numerous Companys of an available load. Usually, the very first approved Carrier with acceptable rate range determined by their Transportation Director for that day and load will prevail. Shippers want to move their freight when they want to move it, without playing on the phone or computer for an hour to move a load. The longer you expect dispatch to spend getting your desired rate and destination increases your opportunity to sit enormously. My suggestion to o/o's is give your dispatch a realistic number for rates, be prepared to run what comes up, or, stay on the porch until your required activity is completed. There is just simply, little time to play tag and be successful. I can assure you, you will run a lot more at acceptable rates, and still get the occasional "home run", IF you have confidence in your dispatch, try it. The ME, ME, ME attitude has sunk a lot of Expeditors.
Well said.
I am reminded of something once said by Lawrence McCord: "Expediting does not tolerate a personal agenda."
Just as the rain does not know or care if you get wet, the freight does not know or care what you want.
Success in this business is not about meeting your needs. It is about meeting the needs of the freight and the people who ship it.
The question I have is this: Should people in a vehicle like that always expect the higher rate, even when hauling freight that would fit in a cargo van? I've always operated on the model that the rates are for the type of load, not the type of truck that a load is going into. If a large straight truck is hauling a two skid cargo van load where a dock high truck is not retired, that driver should expect the cargo van rate for that load, unless the carrier was lucky enough to get a straight truck rate for the load. When I was leased to another carrier in my Sprinter, I got van rates for van loads and a higher rate for loads that required the Sprinter. I didn't expect to always get the Sprinter rate even when I was hauling a van load, and I also didn't expect to always be hauling Sprinter freight. I just don't think it's reasonable to expect to always get the higher rate, or to only haul the larger loads and expect to stay as busy. What do y'all think?