And pathetic.......but this crap is getting out of hand!!!!!
And pathetic.......but this crap is getting out of hand!!!!!
OK, my mistake - sort of. Since we were talking about events leading up to Scalia's death and funeral there were three deaths of sitting Justices, two during Eisenhower's terms, one during W's. Justice Jackson apparently got left out of the article I referenced earlier. So since the Kennedy administration, there was one during the period leading up to the death of Scalia.There have been four, not two. Four. Two were attended by the President, and two were not. See Post #15.
Other than to pay respect and tribute to one of the most influential members of SCOTUS, there are none of those.The is no historical precedent, no rules, regulations, decorum, traditions or anything else that might suggest the President needs to attend a SC Justice funeral just because he's the President.
What's being friends got to do with it? Obama attended Cronkite's funeral and had never met him. Cronkite had been off the air since 1981. BTW, that's one of the primary functions of VPs - attend funeralsTherefore the liberal Democrat President is supposed to attend? That makes no sense. Biden attended, not because Scalia was a revered conservative Justice, but because he and Scalia were friends, and his wife and Scalia's wife were long time close friends.
Obama and Ginsburg are friends, so yeah, probably
Sometimes we digress. That being said, let's go back to your OP - now Obama can really change things, putting icing on the cake of his "fundamental transformation" of our country. IMHO, an artful politician would have attended Scalia's funeral and praised his accomplishments and contributions to our legal system to the heavens before nominating a radical liberal like Loretta Lynch or Elizabeth Warren as a replacement. That may come in the very near future, so let's hope the Republican controlled Senate shows some spine and blocks any nomination Obama may offer - even if he or she may be a so-called moderate.And pathetic.
What's pathetic is the outright hatered for Obama.Sometimes we digress. That being said, let's go back to your OP - now Obama can really change things, putting icing on the cake of his "fundamental transformation" of our country. IMHO, an artful politician would have attended Scalia's funeral and praised his accomplishments and contributions to our legal system to the heavens before nominating a radical liberal like Loretta Lynch or Elizabeth Warren as a replacement. That may come in the very near future, so let's hope the Republican controlled Senate shows some spine and blocks any nomination Obama may offer - even if he or she may be a so-called moderate.
What's pathetic is the outright hatered for Obama.
Everybody has the right to agree or disagree with a political opponent, but the amount of venomous garbage spewed by the far right is sad.
Far right or far left; radicals, extremists, wackos, whatever you want to call them are still radicals, extremists, wackos or whatever you want to call. If Obama wasn't black, the "venomous garbage spewed by the far right is sad"; wouldn't be venomous garbage or sad. It would be politics as usual. Pick a side. Split the country. Divide and conquer!Everybody has the right to agree or disagree with a political opponent, but the amount of venomous garbage spewed by the far right is sad.
So now we've gone "Super Baseball Statistics" and narrowed it down to the Kennedy Administration? OK fine, since the Obama administration, there was only one during the period leading up and including Scalia's death. How's that?So since the Kennedy administration, there was one during the period leading up to the death of Scalia.
Obama did that at the most appropriate time and place, on Friday at the Supreme Court Building. A Catholic funeral mass is first and foremost a funeral mass, not an event of State, and the Catholic church discourages distractions and disruptions that would take away from the funeral mass itself. If Obama had attended, the constant camera cutaways to him would be a constant distraction from the mass. Obama sent Biden and his wife, Catholics, in his stead. There is absolutely nothing even remotely unusual about that.Other than to pay respect and tribute to one of the most influential members of SCOTUS, there are none of those.
People tend to attend the funerals of people they were friends with. Since Obama and Ginsburg are friends, "yeah, probably" he would attend her funeral.What's being friends got to do with it?
I have no idea why you're so fixated on Cronkite. Maybe it's because he wasn't a conservative, ergo he's scum, or maybe it's because someone else is fixated on Cronkite and you read what they had to say and just went with it, but Obama did not attend Walter Cronkite's funeral.Obama attended Cronkite's funeral and had never met him. Cronkite had been off the air since 1981.
That's one of the many customary functions of the VP, to act as a surrogate for the President, but his one and only primary function is to preside over the Senate.BTW, that's one of the primary functions of VPs - attend funerals
That's just partisan wishful thinking. Artful has nothing to do with Lynch or Warren. You can replace "artful" with "conservative" and at least the sentence makes total sense.IMHO, an artful politician would have attended Scalia's funeral and praised his accomplishments and contributions to our legal system to the heavens before nominating a radical liberal like Loretta Lynch or Elizabeth Warren as a replacement.
Someone has watched too much Pelican Brief!!"Stupid" is too nice a word.
Irresponsible and assinine comments from the lunitics on the far right is par for the course nowadays.
Wait....it has to be true, it was on FOX news!Someone has watched too much Pelican Brief!!
On a side note.... Antonia?
We're talking about the period of time leading up to Scalia's funeral.So now we've gone "Super Baseball Statistics" and narrowed it down to the Kennedy Administration? OK fine, since the Obama administration, there was only one during the period leading up and including Scalia's death. How's that?
You're obviously too young to remember the JFK funeralObama did that at the most appropriate time and place, on Friday at the Supreme Court Building. A Catholic funeral mass is first and foremost a funeral mass, not an event of State, and the Catholic church discourages distractions and disruptions that would take away from the funeral mass itself. If Obama had attended, the constant camera cutaways to him would be a constant distraction from the mass. Obama sent Biden and his wife, Catholics, in his stead. There is absolutely nothing even remotely unusual about that.
"People" and "Politicians" are two separate and unequal categories. Were the Obamas "friends" with Clementa Pinckney?People tend to attend the funerals of people they were friends with. Since Obama and Ginsburg are friends, "yeah, probably" he would attend her funeral.
Cronkite was a long-retired liberal newscaster who Obama had never met. Yet he chose to attend and vocally pay tribute to him at his MEMORIAL service...even though they were strangers. It's called political showmanship.I have no idea why you're so fixated on Cronkite. Maybe it's because he wasn't a conservative, ergo he's scum, or maybe it's because someone else is fixated on Cronkite and you read what they had to say and just went with it, but Obama did not attend Walter Cronkite's funeral.
I certainly don't remember it as if I was there, or with the details of the mind of an adult, but his assassination and funeral had a great impact on me as a child. Nevertheless, while Kennedy's was a State funeral, Scalia's funeral was not.You're obviously too young to remember the JFK funeral
I have no idea whether the Obamas were "friends" with Clementa Pinckney." My comment was solely about Obama and Ginsburg. You asked if it were Ginsburg instead of Scalia, would Obama be there, and I answered that he probably would, because he and Ginsburg are friends. Just because people attend the funerals of those they were friends with doesn't mean that's the only allowable reason for them to attend a funeral, nor does it mean that politicians can only attend funerals solely or primarily for political reasons.People" and "Politicians" are two separate and unequal categories. Were the Obamas "friends" with Clementa Pinckney?
Possibly. I'm not sure that "political showmanship" is the right phase to apply to someone who was invited to go there and speak. "Political opportunist," perhaps, but there were several invited speakers who spoke at the memorial. The argument can certainly be made that any funeral the president attends could be considered political showmanship, including, yes, Republican Presidents when they go to funerals.Cronkite was a long-retired liberal newscaster who Obama had never met. Yet he chose to attend and vocally pay tribute to him at his MEMORIAL service...even though they were strangers. It's called political showmanship.