I was at a pu last week when a FCC DR unit came in with no lettering.
Didnt think nothing of it.
Hmmmm, I wonder if the customer or FCC does.
Didnt think nothing of it.
Hmmmm, I wonder if the customer or FCC does.
I was at a pu last week when a FCC DR unit came in with no lettering.
Didnt think nothing of it.
Hmmmm, I wonder if the customer or FCC does.
I've seen a bunch lately that have Fdcc in tiny letters on the sleeper. Can't read it until you are right up on it. Nothing on doors or boxes.
Do eo members feel it would be good for the industry if carriers were pressured into having least the company name on their trucks.
I do not have strong feelings on this one way or the other. Sure, a marked van looks more like a working van but an unmarked van is no less so. As a practical matter, shippers pay very little attention to the trucks.
An exceptionally nice truck may get noticed and the drivers may receive positive comments, but that makes little or any difference the next time an expediter truck or van is ordered; once or twice in a career, maybe, but on a regular basis? No.
An exceptionally dirty and broken down truck may also be noticed but such trucks can be found lettered or unlettered. It is not the lettering that makes the difference, it is the P.O.S. van and it's food-stained-T-shirt-clad driver.
The notion that an unmarked white van prompts evil perceptions in observers is a stretch. Sure, there may be some who associate white vans with kidnappers and rapists, but there will be far more people out there who have no such ideas. For those who would like to argue the point on way or another, I suggest that it is impossible to do so in a conclusive way because the only evidence that can be offered is the claimed perceptions of other people.
I have never heard of a negative association being drawn about white, unmarked vans before reading this thread. For those who are convinced that such vans are perceived as evil by the general public, I suggest you are doing a disservice to the expediting industry by broadcasting the idea (myth). A number of fine expediters drive white, unmarked vans and they are not evil or otherwise wanting in social merit because one operates such a rig.
It is a different question if you are talking about carriers and their decision to mark or not mark a van. But even there, let's be clear about what the issue is. Are we cloaking our negative feelings toward certain carriers in a conversation about unmarked vans? Perhaps it would be better to talk about how certain carriers operate or fail to operate instead of what letters, if any, appear on their vans.
Finally, in the small town in which I grew up, the town baker drove a white van. He used it to deliver bread and such to churches and grocery stores and community picnics, and as a personal vehicle too. This happy man was a homeowner, tax payer and went to church every Sunday with his wife and children. He was greeted with joy by all who knew him.
The notion that such a person should be suspected of being a pedophile or kidnapper because he drives a white van is ridiculous and offensive. It takes a strong dose of arrogance and intellectual lethargy to make such an assertion.
The unknown is always more suspicious than the known. There's no way around that.
If anything, lettered vans amongst a sea of other lettered vans reduces the chances of being singled out and targeted. An unlettered van amongst a sea of lettered vans is self-singled out for targeting. "What's so special about what that guy is hauling that he doesn't even want to identify his purpose and intent?" Interesting.
The notion that shippers don't notice vehicles isn't entirely true.
Also if you have never heard the connections against vans and pedophiles and killers you have lived a very very sheltered life.
That may be, but what exactly would it be that I was sheltered from?
Only the very worst parts of society, consider yourself lucky.
I have worked in a prison and in politics. You don't have to go much further than that to be exposed to and interact with the worst of the worst.
From Yahoo Answers. Apparently unmarked vans creep the general public out.
Well, I would think the flip side of fear of the unknown is "fearless (or unconcern) of the unknown". Curiosity by definition is an investigation to learn more, an intense desire to know and understand, and isn't usually motivated by an unconcern for, or being fearless of something.That depends on the mind of the person in whom the known and unknown are encountered, on the person or object in question, and on the context. The flip side of fear of the unknown is curiosity about it. Both traits exist in equal measure in human beings, don't you think?
Reality, the conversations of others, news reports...That may be, but what exactly would it be that I was sheltered from?