Last 3 loads...including FSC
$1.079......FSC .169
$1.074......FSC .204
$1.034......FSC .229
nothing special all CV loads...the very same that if I were with my last carrier I'd have done for .81...
Hows that for VOLUME pricing...
and BTW...how come the drivers FSC rate has not changed for like 6 months? Pegged at .11 never moves...is that also a flat rate?
Last 3 loads...including FSC
$1.079......FSC .169
$1.074......FSC .204
$1.034......FSC .229
nothing special all CV loads...the very same that if I were with my last carrier I'd have done for .81...
Hows that for VOLUME pricing...
and BTW...how come the drivers FSC rate has not changed for like 6 months? Pegged at .11 never moves...is that also a flat rate?
I do know one thing. Some (no names mentioned) of the larger carriers better wake up. Many are too top heavy, waste resources on trying to reinvent the wheel, pit drivers against each other, or spending a dollar to take a dime from the owner operator.
That rate confirms what I had said previously in this thread. When I see the total rate of freight, it tells me what the margin is to the carrier when I know what the truck pay is.
Just a couple of things. Van rates at the Cat are likely all over the place just like they are for other vehicle sizes some are at .85 plus FSC, some at 77 plus FSC and I hadn't heard the 70. Certainly could be as I don't follow the vans very close.
I do know one thing. Some (no names mentioned) of the larger carriers better wake up. Many are too top heavy, waste resources on trying to reinvent the wheel, pit drivers against each other, or spending a dollar to take a dime from the owner operator. With a driver shortage looming, those sins will be costly for the carriers that participate.
I think we are seeing it impact some carriers already.
The biggest question is, how long will it be before they actually figure it out?
What's a good return for the fleet owner layer in good times and bad?
What's a good return for the fleet owner layer in good times and bad?
Dave,
What I sometimes wonder about small carrier who are doing well, why are they doing well?
I think a lot of the problems carriers have is a lack of understanding how to manage resources within their company. One carrier I knew well had too many people doing too many single jobs - not a lot of multitasking going on. They treated everything as a priority within the office and failed to understand that there is no need for 20 when 4 can to the job.
Dave,
What I sometimes wonder about small carrier who are doing well, why are they doing well?
I think a lot of the problems carriers have is a lack of understanding how to manage resources within their company. One carrier I knew well had too many people doing too many single jobs - not a lot of multitasking going on. They treated everything as a priority within the office and failed to understand that there is no need for 20 when 4 can to the job.
The smaller ones seem do things in a much more direct manner.
They also have a fraction of the overhead.
Some (not all) live and die by the success of the larger carriers and 3pl's as that is where they source their freight from.
That is why when the economy went south, many smaller outfits became casualties.
The smaller ones seem do things in a much more direct manner.
They also have a fraction of the overhead.
Some (not all) live and die by the success of the larger carriers and 3pl's as that is where they source their freight from.
That is why when the economy went south, many smaller outfits became casualties.