>Since this is a forum section for the newcomers, most agree
>that a accurate realistic description of the business is
>what is requested. That includes both positive and negative
>information. Especially when many are risking their personal
>assets.
>It is clearly a disservice for those to enter and not see
>all the facts.
>
>As with any business there are many risks, and with trucking
>in general, there is a large turnover. That doesn't happen
>by accident.
>The largest percentage of issues are misinformed people
>about how the industry works.
>Can you make a decent living ect in trucking? Absolutely.
>But the ones that have endured the test of time are the ones
>that have entered with very realistic expectations.
With all due respect, Dave, that's up to the newbie to decide which part is applicable to them. Although I didn't read A-team's original post, and know he's a bit excited at his success, is that reason to edit it?
We know A-team gave advice to one individual that resulted in him buying a new truck. There were countless others who said to go with an o/o instead. I probably would've listened to A-team too if I had the money. But in the end, if I failed, could I really blame his advice? No. I would've listened to what I wanted to hear. And when you look at it now, that individual is having the time of his life because he listened to A-team.
Whether you like his advice or not, it gives a unique aspect to expediting, when in fact, this is a pretty bleak profession to begin with. I hear so many horror stories, not to mention my own, that would make one wonder why they would want to be a part of it all. It's the freedom! First and formost, it's the idea of getting out there and being your own boss. And A-team is giving the perfect example of what's actually right about the industry... even if he doesn't tell the bad along with the good. That's everyone else's job if they oppose his view... to contradict it. I hate to see it deleted because someone disagrees. Deletes are for shouting matches... not for different points of view.