My sentiments exactly. You can often tell what a car is about to do even before the driver knows he's gonna do it. In addition to looking at the driver and picking up on his clues, you can pick up on certain tendencies that 4-wheelers have based on the surrounding traffic, the traffic patterns themselves, speed, distances between vehicles, distances to upcoming exits, etc. It's a game that I'm getting pretty good at. It's to the point now where a car that shoots across three lanes of traffic to just barely make that exit no longer surprises me, 'cause more often than not I've already called it.
A big rig driver who complains that a 4-wheeler cut him off is a driver who failed to recognize that the possibility, and the probability, of being cut-off was there in the first place.
The ones that get me are the drivers who complain about a 4-wheeler cutting in front of them and then slamming on the brakes. Yeah, that's bad when it happens, but it's something they should expect if they observe and learn from the patterns. But, the problem is, the ones who complain loudest about it are likely to do the same exact thing, essentially. You've got one truck going 56 miles an hour and another right behind going 56 1/2 miles an hour. You're in the hammer lane going 65 miles an hour, about to pass both trucks. At the last possible instant, Mr. 56 1/5 slides over right in front of you, forcing you to dynamite your own brakes to keep from hitting him. He has, effectively, pulled over right in front of you and slammed on the brakes.
These are the same drivers that flash their brights to let ya know it's OK to come back over. (The law states no brights within 500 feet of oncoming traffic, and no brights within 300 feet of a passing vehicle or a vehicle you are about to pass that is going in the same direction you are. It's polite, and safe, to let someone know that it's OK to come back over, but it's kinda rude to totally trash their night vision when doing so.)
Don't get me started on the improper use of fog lamps.