A new high in low--burkas for babies

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
At what point might it be acceptable to tell Muslims they have to leave the planet? "We don't care where you go, but you can't stay here."

Saudi cleric calls for burkas for babies

This is no surprise. After all, another Saudi sheikh, Dr. Ahmad Al-Mu'bi, said in 2008: "There is no minimal age for entering marriage. You can have a marriage contract even with a one-year-old girl." If a one-year-old girl can be married, a one-year-old girl can be an object of desire. And if a one-year-old girl can be an object of desire, then it is her responsibility to cover up.

“'Burkas for babies'”: Saudi cleric’s new fatwa causes controversy," by Mohammad Alyousei for al-Arabiya, February 3 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A Saudi cleric has called for all female babies to be fully covered by wearing the face veil, commonly known as the burka, citing reports of little girls being sexually molested.

In a TV interview on the Islamic Al-Majd TV, which seems to date back to mid-last year, Sheikh Abdullah Daoud, stressed that wearing the veil will protect baby girls. The Sheikh tried to back his assertion with claims of sexual molestation against babies in the kingdom, quoting unnamed medical and security sources.

Recently picked up on social media, sheikh Dauod’s statement prompted wide condemnation from his fellow Saudis on Twitter. Some tweeps called for the Sheikh to be held accountable because his ruling denigrates Islam and breaches individual privacy.

Sheikh Mohammad Al-Jzlana, former judge at the Saudi Board of Grievances, told Al Arabiya that Dauod’s ruling was denigrating to Islam and Shariah and made Islam look bad.

Jjzlana urged people to ignore unregulated fatwas and explained that there are special regulations set by the Saudi authorities to administer religious edicts and appoint those who are entitled to issue them.

He said that he feels sad whenever he sees a family walking around with a veiled baby, describing that as injustice to children.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
At what point might it be acceptable to tell Muslims they have to leave the planet? "We don't care where you go, but you can't stay here."
I dunno. If the litmus test for telling Muslims they have to leave the planet is just one crackpot cleric, then Christians should really keep a vigilant watch for any crackpot Christians out there.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
I dunno. If the litmus test for telling Muslims they have to leave the planet is just one crackpot cleric, then Christians should really keep a vigilant watch for any crackpot Christians out there.
I expected such a comment, though I expected it from elsewhere. The difference is that wacko Christians are a departure from the norm, while wacko Muslims are the norm.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
A simpler solution to abuse and misuse of underage girls is application of a Henderson tool to the abuser.
 

scottm4211

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Let's go back to the simpler days of circumcision for boys and piercing the ears of baby girls. :thumbup:
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Let's go back to the simpler days of circumcision for boys and piercing the ears of baby girls. :thumbup:

San Francisco tried to ban circumcision. Many believe that it is not a good thing. Germany has banned it with no exceptions for religious beliefs.

Not so simple anymore. How many piercings?
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
I expected such a comment, though I expected it from elsewhere. The difference is that wacko Christians are a departure from the norm, while wacko Muslims are the norm.
Careful. That's exactly what a wacko Christian would say.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
Out of interest AMonger .... why does this distress you so?
Are you kidding? This is essentially child abuse by cavemen. Why out doesn't bother you, is the question. But as I recall, you have no problem with prenatal infantacide as long as the baby's father is a rapist, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
Because in order for his faith/religion/etc to be "right", all others must necessarily be "wrong" ?
I have no need for my religion to be right in anyone's eyes; it's already right regardless. But this is another example of the "religion of peace," the violent cavemen having to make infant girls less sexy so they don't molest them. That this story can exist without you objecting to the cavemen...
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Nothing like a nice 'n' juicy ad hominem wrapped in pickled red herring for a tasty snack.
 

EnglishLady

Veteran Expediter
Are you kidding? This is essentially child abuse by cavemen. Why out doesn't bother you, is the question. But as I recall, you have no problem with prenatal infantacide as long as the baby's father is a rapist, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised.



Oh for goodness sake .... Grow up !
 

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Are you kidding? This is essentially child abuse by cavemen. Why out doesn't bother you, is the question. But as I recall, you have no problem with prenatal infantacide as long as the baby's father is a rapist, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

I have no need for my religion to be right in anyone's eyes; it's already right regardless. But this is another example of the "religion of peace," the violent cavemen having to make infant girls less sexy so they don't molest them. That this story can exist without you objecting to the cavemen...

pope_face_palm.jpg
 
Top