A new conspiracy?

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Well, I'd have to review the current legislation - but in the original bill (HR2525) that Linder introduced, payroll taxes (those taxes used to fund Social Security) were repealed - thereby funding Social Security thru a sales tax. ...... if that ain't touching Social Security ...... brother, I don't know what would be.

A quick look on THOMAS and I see that this aspect remains unchanged in the current legislation, HR25.

While I might (or might not) agree with that as a philosophical premise, the fact remains that as a political premise, this is screwing with the funding mechanisim of Social Security - and opens the door to having your head handed to you on a platter, politically. Anyone (on the opposition side, against tax reform) who knows even a little about PR and positioning would be licking their chops on this one ..... you could have a field day.

Well Rlent, using a payroll deduction blows the entire premise of a real fair tax system out of the water. It eliminates all payroll (source derived) taxes which really is a good thing.

But with that simply said, here is two issues;

1 - Social Security's funding has been messed with since it's inception. From the mid 30's to date the changes and sources have 'evolved' to 'change with the times'. AND will change in the future when there is a reality of a cut in services.

2 - funding still comes from the people.

Let me put it in another way.

The reason the fair tax is good is because we spend more than we actually make. What this means is at this time, if the fair tax was enacted, we would see a surge in intake revenue, not a decline. even if we save 20% of what we make, we still have to spend money as consumers - no way around this.

Our present system of labor revenue derived funding, the industrial shifts to offshore manufacturing and a true job market condition with true unemployment, the only way we can maintain any funding levels is raise taxes and come up with more ways to tax. We see a solution with the EU where they are micromanaging their economy while artificially propping up the Euro and fighting to reduce tariffs to emerging markets. There is a prediction about the collapse of the EU in our lifetime unless the EU continues to expand and take over countries economies. Just the harmonizing of the laws and policies is getting a lot of kick back because countries are losing their identity.

But we don't want to go down that path where we have an income tax, we have a VAT tax and a GST tax, do we?

Of course not.

What we need is something that the EU can't really have much left - Growth!

We really need is growth, we need to have people use their money to invest and purchase. We need to have companies come here, set up shop and employ people. We need to have the country that can be an investment vehicle through the monetary system - the Dollar.

We will never get this with the present tax system, it is far too punitive and lacks incentives - even with the deductions and tax credits just look at the green movement and why there is not a solar panel on each home.

The Fair Tax has the chance to get the economy growing and get things rolling.

By the way, the Fair Tax was more research than the present system we have in 1910. If you don't know our present system has its roots in the Communist Manifesto and we followed other counties in a progressive tax system. FDR had in his cabinet people who knew Lenin and Stalin and helped give us the present sourced derived revenue. No one sat down with the economist to determine what system we were going to use, they just sat around discussing how to get the most money fast.

I don't think that the super rich had a lot to do with the income tax because of they were targets right from the start from the progressives.

Nor is there any actual "Social Security Trust Fund" as in an real account somewhere with actual money deposited in it - it's merely just an entry on a book keeping ledger ...... the money ain't laid aside somewhere - Social Security is funded out of the general revenue fund receipts on an ongoing basis.
Yes I know, what I meant is that there is a receipt that x amount of money was taken from me and many think that it is their money - hence the entitlement mentality. People think that the system is there for them, the poor hard working people but when you get involved with the system, see how it works and who it really works for, you can not think any good of it. So I use the same speak as others.

I know that many don't care about taxes. I know that many would rather not have any changes but here is a chance to help our country at the same time helping everyone. Read the book, go to the Fair Tax site
 

mrgoodtude

Not a Member
Mike,

Of course who you support is totally a personal decision ..... but methinks that any calculation that is predicated on "I'll support who I think can win - rather than the candidate who I feel is best for the country ..... because the media says he don't have a chance" does not serve this country well.

But hey that's coming from someone who voted for Ross Perot twice :eek:

I couldn't agree more but history repeats itself..
As far as Ross Perot I loved that guy.
 

mrgoodtude

Not a Member
1) Fred Thompson... what you see is what you get; which is classic, southern wisdom. He's the Constitutionalist of the Republicans. His philosophy is simple... get the federal government out of babysitting, and get them back to what the Constitution dictated.
Fred has been my favorite from the get go but I don't believe he can pull it off at this point (just like another favorite in Ron Paul).

2) Mit Romney... a very frank and successful businessman. Never will be caught in a scandal. He has a conscience! Successful as governor of one of the most liberal states. He gets things done!
Romney If I am to be honest and I will is Mormon and I will accept the flogging graciously for saying I have had a few bad business dealings with devout Mormons..
I am however not prejudice by nature and will give Mit more web space on my lap.

3) Rudy Gulliani... what he's done to NYC is enough for me to vote for him! We all know his stance on terrorists. He will not be easy on them!
Rudy...
Just don't feel comfortable, handling a crisis in NY city vs a country in peril just isn't the same to me.
Not trying to start a peeing contest just a genuine interest in the majority mindset sparked by a really good (and very well written thread).
Mike
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
Rudy...
Just don't feel comfortable, handling a crisis in NY city vs a country in peril just isn't the same to me.
Not trying to start a peeing contest just a genuine interest in the majority mindset sparked by a really good (and very well written thread).
Mike

Not so much what he did after 911; but what he accomplished before. He cleaned up Times Square under much protest. You can actually visit there without being bombarded by sex shops and such. He got the ppl behind him to clean up the streets. A city-wide effort to get rid of graffiti, filth, etc. Ppl actually took pride in their city. No small feat in a city of 9 mil. A lot of states aren't even that big. Not to mention... he's a Republican, and was mayor for TWO TERMS in NYC! That alone says he gets things done. (or pays the right ppl)
 

iceroadtrucker

Veteran Expediter
Driver





Bill Goldberg Promo Returns
00:28 From: calefanfa
Views: 66,679














Goldberg returns promo #2
05:26 From: xJannnnyx
Views: 22,626






Right now it looks like its any bodys game
If America makes a stand once and for all
maybe we can change things. But if not
its going to be the same old Pro Quo.
The only ones to blame is our selves.
One good man can get the Ball rolling but it
takes a team to keep it going.
The above is a message to the Company.
maybe now youll get the hint.
No Chains allowed.
Obama Girl Returns for Iowa! (Why Obama Won)
02:19 From: barelypolitical
Views: 934,198
 
Last edited:
Top