Sorry but the idea that their is only x amount of profit (available dollars to be made) is completely false which pretty much blows the rest of your theory out of the water.
I think what she's saying is that if a company makes, say, 20% profit, that it should more or less be evenly distributed amongst the workers.
Knock KnockSo...DON'T eat out so often....problem solved....money saved....Americans eat out far too much....Obesity is at record levels....Obesity causes your healthcare costs to increase and that is on YOU! Not Obama........
Of course there will always be poor people - we get that. There will also always be people whose best financial interests lie in keeping the working poor as poor as possible, because there's only so much profit: more for you is less for me. It is not in our best interests to restrain them too much, because they are the smart & successful kind of people - but neither is it in our best interests to allow them to decide who is worth how much, once the failure of self restraint is so glaringly obvious.
It's all about balance. When CEOs made 2 or 300 times as much as their entry level workers, no one complained, but the gap just kept getting bigger. It's now somewhere around 850 to 1 in many companies, and that's just plain nuts.
As Dave says, the answer is moving people into marketable careers - only there aren't enough of those to satisfy the need. College graduates can't find jobs, even in 'in demand' fields, because so many jobs have been outsourced, to improve the profits at the top.
If it continues, where does it end? How do we function without a viable middle class?
"Evenly"? Where would you get such a dumb idea? I specifically said that when the CEO made 200 times as much as the workers, no one complained. We understand that capitalism rewards those who succeed, and that's how we want it. But this is capitalism run amok, when profits and bonuses and worker productivity all increase, but minimum wage remains flat for many years? When the middle class is shrinking, while megazillionaires are increasing?
We get that the people who run companies deserve a boatload of money, but they don't deserve so much of the profits that the people who do the actual work require food stamps to survive.
Knock Knock
I looked at Obama's Premiums for health care, did so after a chest pain she had (cost 5K to be under a doughnet for 15 min).. My cost is 700 a month for the silver plan with a $5000 deductible. I can't afford that. Nor can I afford the 12k bill for feeling a little under the weather. **** Obama
Outrageous taxes aimed at keeping the People in their place so old money can remain in power is why we are broke. That and government programs like ObamaCare aimed at controlling us.
Government is the evil in charge.
Government is not the evil in charge, they are only the tool being used against us by the "old money" you spoke about.
What is the only thing a man with power (money) want? More power
What will a man with power (money) do to keep it? Anything they have to do.
Maybe, but they are the one's who have the power to take it from us. Like ObamaCare, Welfare, Medicade, etc etc etc.
We are kept broke to keep the Kennedy's, Bush's and Kerry's in power.
"By the way, I refuse to call it Obamacare, he had nothing to do with that law other than signing his name to it."
He was just the evil Marxist stooge that pushed it as his "PupperMaster" told him to do.
Well, if told either do what you are told or take a bullet, what would you do?
I would fight. I would do neither willingly. Only cowards do as they are told or give up.
AND
For all you Marxist "gemmie goober" who want the US government to take total control of your health care, consider this:
The estimated percentage of American who are veterans is 13%. Do you REALLY think that since it is PROVEN beyond a shadow of a doubt that they cannot provide proper health care for a small percentage of 13% of the population, what in the name of pluperfect hell makes you thing they can provide proper health care for 100% of the entire population.
On top of that, do you REALLY believe that the Obama's, Clinton's, Kennedy's, Bush's, Romney's, Ford's and Buffet's, will REALLY have the same standard of health care that your are FORCED to take?
If so, what are you smoking? Cow pies?
And if they threatened to go after your family? Remember, these greedy people will do whatever they need to do to keep their power. The president has a wife and children to think about, he is going to do as he is told.
I am a socialist so yes I believe in a national heath care system, and I agree with you that the system to take care of our vets is nothing more than a joke.
And no, the rich people will not have the same level of healthcare as we common folks, there will always be 2 levels of healthcare, one for us and one for them. Once the health care act is repealed, there will so few people who will be able to afford health care that what is left will only be able to support the rich.