24 Hour Nazi Party People

dieseldiva

Veteran Expediter
How in the world can someone say this with such conviction, without hesitation and with a straight face? I can see Gretchen from the Fox and Friends morning show making that statement, but Megyn, c'mon now. This is just to easy for Jon Stewart, hell......it would be easy for a 5th grader.

24 Hour Nazi Party People - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart - 01/24/11 - Video Clip | Comedy Central

.....................................................................................

To, Too, Two
What's the difference between to, too, and two? It's not too difficult to use them, once you take the time to learn what they mean - and do some practicing too.


To

To has two functions. First, as a preposition, in which case it always precedes a noun.

I'm going to the store

He went to Italy

This belongs to David

Secondly, to indicates an infinitive when it precedes a verb.

I need to study

We want to help

He's going to eat


Too

Too also has two uses. First, as a synonym for "also":

Can I go too?

He went to France too

I think that's Paul's book too

Secondly, too means excessively when it precedes an adjective or adverb.

I'm too tired

He's walking too quickly

I ate too much


Two

Two is a number.

One, two, three...

I have two cars

She ate two pieces of pie


The Bottom Line

The confusion between to, too, and two occurs because the three words are pronounced identically.

One: If you're able to replace the word with "also" or "excessively/too much," use too. Two: If the word is a number, use two. Otherwise, you'll want to use to.
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
Thank you for pointing that out to me. I am usually pretty good at using that word correctly, this time I didn't.
 

dieseldiva

Veteran Expediter
Another thought. I've been watching some MSNBC lately and I'd like to see someone do a count on how many times in a day the name Sarah Palin is spoken. They're really ate up with her over there!
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
Actually, I'm kinda surprised, she's usually more articulate than that.

I would say she was quite articulate in her response to Mr. Socarides comments. She was distinct, clear and definate when she said Fox commentaters do not use Nazi comparisons.
 

dieseldiva

Veteran Expediter
I would say she was quite articulate in her response to Mr. Socarides comments. She was distinct, clear and definate when she said Fox commentaters do not use Nazi comparisons.

I should have used a different word. She's normally better informed before she speaks.......articulately, of course!:p
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
My 7 month old grandson just got turkey for the first time. My daughter made a video of it. If I hadn't seen him take a bite of turkey from the spoon I'd have thought he was watching Jon Stewart. He made faces, choked, gagged, almost threw up and cried.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
This falls into the "who cares?" category.

Many make comparisons while others live the dream.

It is a good illustration of how we view evil, because we don't approach true evil and use that as a comparison.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
It would be a more interesting count to see how many of this governments programs are no allowed under our Constitution. Good example, the ATF not allowing certain shotguns to be imported into the country because they have no valid sporting use. The Second Amendment has no basis in sporting uses. It is for self defense. Defense of home and family against criminals and governments. It is the ultimate check and balance to the Federal Government and that is why it was written. Seems like that ATF and Obama administration does not understand that or the "Shall not be infringed" part. Seems like the Bill of Rights is considered to be obsolete to this bums. By the way, the Nazis were really big on gun control, so was Soviet Russia. So is Red China. I guess it's not a good thing to compare that though.


"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing."

- Adolf Hitler

Keep in mind, we are rapidly becoming a "subject race" in this country. Heath care by the FORCE of law. Welfare by the FORCE of law. Once a government starts down this slope they never stop. This slide started a VERY long time ago. The slope is getting steeper, fast.
 
Last edited:

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Sorry Layout, I'm bored this morning. So I will use your comments as a jumping off point.

The atf not allowing a semiautomatic rifle like shotgun imported doesn't stop anyone from owning one that is made in the US or those that are already here. I do find that some of the issues with gun control rather amusing when brought up in discussion and print.

The idea of gun control from the Europeans point of view doesn't start with Hitler or the Nazis but rather the monarchies of the old world. It wasn't the Nazia who had the most harsh gun control laws nor were they the ones who used race and religion as a basis for limiting freedoms.

But I digress ...

No one seems to make or really understand is that the one who is in control of the laws are the ones we are in control of, there is no magic that is bestowed upon the people we elect but rather the ignorance and complacency of the voter not to be engaged.

When we do actually see something positive out of the ATF or gun control laws, we still get the same thing - the feds don't have a right - they actually don't have the right for a lot of things, including enforcing laws and invading states to keep the union. An example I think is a good thing is a database with the names of those who are not allowed to posses or obtain a firearm - felons who were convicted of a crime. It is simple, and clear cut that there should be one, but many can't come to grips with it. It is just like the sex offenders list, a public accessible database that the states use is a good thing and actually helps the cause of less gun control laws when you think about it.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I am more than well aware that weapons, not only guns, control was the hallmark of the incest infested royal families of Europe. Just as gun control was not started by Obama, just increased. Restricting the ability of the people to control their government is typical of oppressive governments. The more oppressive a government becomes the more they restrict those abilities. The European royal families did NOT come into power by being nice. They did it by committing untold horrors upon those who they subject.

Have a list of felons, OK, NOT in the hands of the Feds. Find a way to check that list WITHOUT infringing on MY right to be assumed innocent. That right is taken from me every time I try to exercise my RIGHT to purchase a gun. They ASSUME that I am a felon and therefor must be caught. Back round checks are a direct infringement of many of my constitutional rights. The Feds have NO business in this what so ever. At least, not in a FREE country. The ONLY reason they are involved is to restrict freedom and control the People.

Obama voted for a bill in IL that would have outlawed EVERY semi-auto shotgun in the United States, regardless of where it was produced. Nothing good comes out of the Feds assuming these powers.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Make a law that knowingly buying a firearm when prohibited to do so is a capital offense with no option, just execution.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
I am more than well aware that weapons, not only guns, control was the hallmark of the incest infested royal families of Europe. Just as gun control was not started by Obama, just increased. Restricting the ability of the people to control their government is typical of oppressive governments. The more oppressive a government becomes the more they restrict those abilities. The European royal families did NOT come into power by being nice. They did it by committing untold horrors upon those who they subject.

I don't know where the increase has happened, gun ownership and concealed permits are at a all time high, and 39 states now allow CCWs to be issued on demand.

The European experience is where we get most of these laws, their failure to have a safe society isn't looked upon as a problem but ours is. Ours is the only one that speaks of how to keep the government in check as you know, not one other country on earth has done this.

Have a list of felons, OK, NOT in the hands of the Feds. Find a way to check that list WITHOUT infringing on MY right to be assumed innocent. That right is taken from me every time I try to exercise my RIGHT to purchase a gun.

First the feds are not the problem, the states are. The control of guns with some states are non-existent until the feds demanded the background check. There is no infringing of your rights, there isn't a right to assume you are innocent outside a court room, and there is no freedom being taken away. The system can be as easy as a driver's license check, just to see if you are a felon.


They ASSUME that I am a felon and therefor must be caught. Back round checks are a direct infringement of many of my constitutional rights. The Feds have NO business in this what so ever. At least, not in a FREE country. The ONLY reason they are involved is to restrict freedom and control the People.

Well for that, it is the people who are the bureaucrats, not those who want to keep guns out of the hands of felons. The feds have the business in this by ensuring that your rights are protected, that means your right to be safe. By enforcing the basic law, felons are not allowed to posses or purchase firearms, it allows you to be safe and your ownership isn't the problem.

I know that isn't real world but neither is Obama taking over everything.

Obama voted for a bill in IL that would have outlawed EVERY semi-auto shotgun in the United States, regardless of where it was produced. Nothing good comes out of the Feds assuming these powers.

Yep and Clinton did it with a number of other firearms, making ones I owned illegal and forcing me to sell them. Johnson put in the GUn control act of 1968, reinforced by Nixon and other presidents that followed that did a lot of damaged all coming from the JFK murder. FDR restricted automatic weapons through the National Firearms Act of 1934 which in itself is not really constitutional.

I think in the last ten years we have seen more of a positive change than we have a negitive one. NO one is restricted in ownership or access based on the feds. Cities and states are a different story.

Make a law that knowingly buying a firearm when prohibited to do so is a capital offense with no option, just execution.

Leo, you are getting scary. I'm serious that maybe you need to take a break from the road and business, go home for a few months and relax.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
All gun control laws, State or Federal, are an infringement of my constitutional rights. Laws restricting my RIGHT to carry in any way, my right to own in any way or my right to purchase (which is required for LEGAL ownership, I don't have a right to steal guns) are by their very nature an infringement of my Second Amendment rights. That includes what types of firearms I may choose to own. I don't NEED a "carry permit" under out Constitution. I ALREADY have the RIGHT. Getting a "permit" to exercise a RIGHT? Not legal in my book.

I won't sell any gun if made illegal. They will have to take them from me. I am not willing to give in to these sorry jamokes.

By the way, I don't believe that Obama is the ONLY one trying to take over. He is just the latest in a long line of anti-constitution criminals in that position. He gets lambasted now because he is the one there. Fair is fair. The "buck" stops with him now.
 
Last edited:

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I don't think we should execute every law breaker, just the third strike felons plus select others but none of the misdemeanor law breakers. Now, that's three felony convictions with DNA or other 100% irrefutable proof/evidence not just three convictions. Add a few things like escaping from prison, killing a public servant, buying a firearm when already a convicted felon and prohibited and a few others even if not the third felony conviction. Sorry if being severely harsh on those who deserve it is scary to some but that's how it is.
 
Top