Search results

  1. RLENT

    Fox no longer a news organization

    Seemed appropriate ... given your fanatical rejection/dismissal of any/most sources which don't share your extreme ideology ... Errr ... I didn't make any such assertion ... Ms Powers is on record about her political leanings. I actually saw her speak about it on Fox. Well ... in your case...
  2. RLENT

    Fox no longer a news organization

    Ahhh ... that was after you made a blanket statement that she was "a liberal" ... and weren't able to get away with it, due to being called on it ... right ? And ... "might have" ? Is there some doubt in your mind ?
  3. RLENT

    Fox no longer a news organization

    Barf, Youz a real hoot ... keep it comin' ...
  4. RLENT

    I'm really looking forward to this one!

    Probably more likely due to the threats ... probably from "devout" Christians (sic) ... you know: the religiously bigoted ones ... Muslim call to prayer highlights divisions and solidarity at Duke University | World news | The Guardian
  5. RLENT

    Fox no longer a news organization

    Still wanna stick with that bit of fantasy ? The evolution of Kirsten Powers, former liberal | TheBlaze.com
  6. RLENT

    Fox no longer a news organization

    Some folks can't really afford to engage on the substance and the merits of relevant facts - due to the inherent conflict with the fantasy worldview they've adopted ... You're one of them.
  7. RLENT

    Fox no longer a news organization

    No - because your thought processes are so totally @#$^! that you will resort to any and all manner of logical fallacies to arrive at the desired result ... one which satisfies your ideological needs and desires ... Thus it becomes an exercise in irrationality ... Let me repeat that in case...
  8. RLENT

    Fox no longer a news organization

    LOL ... The Barf Comedy Hour continues apace ... Full steam ahead there Bevis ... You're given' anyone who's paying' attention a real education in frothy, rabid ideological extremism ...
  9. RLENT

    No Go Zones: really?

    He's worth $1.5 mil ... and just one step above blithering idiot ... maybe ... if he's lucky ...
  10. RLENT

    No Go Zones: really?

    Potential upside in cold weather ... Dunno if it offsets being unable to see tho' ...
  11. RLENT

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    What I really wanna know is how goes "the movement" ? Have the Southern-based carriers put them Yankee freight haulers out of business yet or what ?
  12. RLENT

    No Go Zones: really?

    Barf, Stop squeezing your winkie while searching for and reading the anti-Mooslim propaganda ... You'll go blind.
  13. RLENT

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Always interesting to gain a little insight into the fantasy world of {some people} ...
  14. RLENT

    No Go Zones: really?

    It's what I watch @ 18:00 if I am front of the tube. Of course - like you - I realize it is somewhat slanted. Some folks think its' gospel however ...
  15. RLENT

    No Go Zones: really?

    Probably Al Jazzera America ... ;)
  16. RLENT

    No Go Zones: really?

    For the resident clown brigade that thinks Faux News is purveying "truth" (... and that the popularity of being deceived - and being too stupid to actually know it - is something to get all happy excited about): LiveLeak.com - French TV makes fun of Fox News (again!)
  17. RLENT

    Buckeyes Riot Burn Destroy Property, Not A Thug In Sight

    Barf, For you to opine on something being "ignorantly written" is just hilarious ... The only thing I can think of that would be even funnier would be if Pulaski were to try and point out other folks use of logical fallacies ...
  18. RLENT

    Our Government an instigator of terror activities?

    Might not be long though ...
  19. RLENT

    Pick'n and a Grin'n

    Yes ... but that still doesn't answer my question.
  20. RLENT

    Pick'n and a Grin'n

    Is there some reason you don't link the original article where you read this ?
Top