Search results

Assumes facts not in evidence ...

The only one that is going bat shizz crazy - as a fanatical partisan would - is you - by attempting to assert that a false statement wasn't false ...when it clearly was ... If that's the hill you wanna die on, then be my guest. You're further qualifying their statement ... yet again ...

Well, if the context is "who have you previously driven for?", nooooo ... it actually wouldn't be 100 percent correct ... Tell that to a judge, while you are testifying under oath - where you have sworn an oath to tell "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" - and have just been...

Transcript of a podcast of an interview with a former IAEA official (the former Head of Verification and Security Policy Coordination Office reporting to the Director General) discussing ... the reality of the IAEA’s procedures for inspecting managed-access sites such as the Parchin military...

Possibly the best unintended consequence to come out of the Iran deal thus far. Article by former AIPAC official M.J. Rosenberg: AIPAC Spent Millions of Dollars to Defeat the Iran Deal. Instead, It May Have Destroyed Itself.

Apparently the mere idea of answering all those questions (ahem ... which probably numbered less than a dozen ...) I posed to you previously was just too much for you to confront and deal with ... as evidenced by your efforts to once again deflect ... (Of course, you just totally ignored...

And I'm still waiting on answers to all my previous questions. I'll be quite happy to respond to each question you have posed to me thus far ... just as soon as you answer or address (in a substantive manner) my previous questions ... I have indicated my willingness to respond above ... but...

Not even close ... but I do understand how someone who can't even divine the plain meaning of words in their own native language might think so ...

Contrary to the generally held belief in Barf's Bizzaro World, words are not vegetables and are not suitable components for making a salad by throwing them in a bowl and then tossing them around.

Are you trying to audition as The Poster Child for intellectual dishonesty ?

Are you frickin' kiddin' me ? Only in Barf's Bizzaro World ... where "It's not so hard to answer the question" means the exact opposite of what it says ...

Unless of course, one is The Barf ... and then there is only perpetual try ... and the attendant FAIL ...

My only argument on the matter is that Hot Air's statement - which was unqualified and of a blanket nature - is false. If you think that is not the case, then you are - at least to some degree - illiterate ... LMAO ... you got some kind of man-gina there bud, asking me multiple questions -...

Well, yeah ... because it showed Hot Air's (blanket, unqualified) assertion was false ... LMAO ... Go learn some Engrish ... After that, consider taking a basic course in logic - so you can use "A" and "B" to navigate and successfully arrive at "C" ... without having to take multiple detours...

Explain which part of it is delusional ... and WHY ... Or, if you're in the mood for even more death-by-a-thousand-cuts-of-double-down, why ALL of it is delusional. I'm guessing by the lack of any answer by you to my previous questions, you are either: 1. having trouble dealing with those...

Well, it seemingly did have a little something to do with denial of rights to one's fellow human beings ...

Well, I'm not particularly a fan of saying things which are different are actually the same ... mostly 'cause they aren't. So you might have grabbed onto a bit of a straw man there. Suffice it to say, the two things are similar ... while, at the same time, being different. Both however...

Don't forget that religious bigotry thing ... credit where credit is due after all ... BTW - it isn't all Kentuckians I'm quite sure ... Uncle Vince, Aunt Della, and their family seemed like perfectly nice folks ... plus Vince was mean with a fiddle ... No kiddin' ?