Search results

Well, I certainly understand your desire to come up with, and operate off of, things based on "what seems right to me" or "what best suits my political agenda" ... which may have been obtained from a warm, moist, and dark place ... but that ain't the way it works. Unfortunately (for you) ... or...

Why would that be hilarious ? Does it being "hilarious" imply anything ? Do you have any evidence that there were any leaks from Mueller's and his team ? It's a yes or no question. If yes, please provide the evidence. Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums

You and the Mutt need to get together and sort out your disagreements - no supporters, supporters of both, etc. - and come up with a unified position on this. When you all get that resolved and decide to stop shooting each other and end your circular firing squad routine give me a holler...

No ... that's not the way we are going to do this. Your apparent assertion is his team does leak - in reply to my assertion that it doesn't appear to leak because there other plausible sources out there for any apparent leaks. So provide evidence that it does leak. Give it your best shot...

Let's define our terms first: What constitutes "a supporter" of a candidate (either x or y) in your mind Muttly ? That seems awfully risky ... particularly for an ex-candidate whose career in politics is likely over. What's in for those that are sticking their necks out to do what is actually...

Mebbe one of Layoutshooter's old buddies: Team Trump Just Blew Its Cover Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums

Still can't actually address any of his points eh ? Guess it sucks to be ... just some random dude off the street ... [emoji23] Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums

Probably better for the rule of law and the pursuit of justice if the folks doin' the investigatin' aren't allies of those that are being investigated. Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums

No wonder you're having a hard time ... you can't even correctly identify the actual people evolved here ... a obvious disconnect from reality ... [emoji23] Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums

I doubt you can show us any leak that isn't explainable by coming from another source outside the Special Counsel's office that would be in a position to know. Furthermore, I also doubt that you can provide any evidence of actual leaks that have originated from the Special Counsel's office...

Yeah ... absolutely hilarious considering the previous post where someone told us it did matter. [emoji23] Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums

LOL ... More partisan THAN WHAT ? Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums

Well, in actual fact, you have no idea what they are looking at, what they have looked at, or what they may look at in the future ... Nobody does ... except maybe Rod Rosenstein. Because they don't leak. And this post I'm replying to is sounding pretty whiny ... Care for some cheese to go...

A conservative voice ... watch and listen: Democrats' memo contradicts allegations in Nunes FISA memo "... BUT BIAS !!!" [emoji23] Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums

Probably true ... [emoji106] Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums

Yes, exactly ... with one major difference: there isn't an ongoing criminal investigation targeted towards the Clintons or the DNC. That should be a clue. DOJ may be looking into how the Clinton email investigation was handled ... or maybe even her actions as SOS ... but it's not likely to...

Geez ... not hard to see why you're having difficulty here. That isn't the rebuttal ... it's an article by a (currently unemployed ?) reporter who is now blogging and apparently is a Faux Nuuz "Contributor" named Sara Carter ... which attempts to CHARACTERIZE what is actually being rebutted...

COVERUP !!! GOP Refuses to Ask Twitter for Private Messages in Russia Probe Naughty naughty ... [emoji23] Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums

As requested ... [emoji106] Apparently The Teat Squeezer wasn't even in the room when McCabe testified ... [emoji23] This guy was: Rep. Himes disputes key GOP intelligence claim Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums

There's certainly no DIRECT EVIDENCE of that ... that we know of anyways ... [emoji23] But there is a lot of circumstantial evidence. And I'm given to understand that quite often in conspiracy cases the bulk of evidence is circumstantial. Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums