Search results

Well, that was the context of the question Biden was replying to. But in at least one sense that would be correct: Consensus and votes are required where legislation is required for action - which is what I think Biden was alluding to in his reply. That (consensus and votes) is not the case...

LOL ... he doesn't need either of those for those things that are constitutionally within his power to do ... right ? After all, he isn't changing tax policy - which was the context of his comments which seems to be being referenced here: Fact-check: Did Biden admit that he's governing like a...

Let me know how it stacks up in a year's time. Then we can check back in three years after that. That characterization/"paraphrasing" leaves just a little something to be desired. Here's what he actually said ... with the relevant context which shows what it was in relation to: No, it...

Why ? Why would I want to do that ?

Ok.

My question was actually rhetorical ... but since you answered: Definition of your | Dictionary.com

And yet what they get a high grade on factual reporting: Media Matters They are certainly an activist organization with a particular partisan slant - I suspect they view themselves as more of a media watchdog of rightwing propaganda and misinformation. Nope - read very carefully: The House...

Well, I can't really speak to that ... since what is being referred to hasn't been defined or specified exactly. One is certainly entitled to one's opinions. Others see it as quite the reverse ... of that I am quite sure.

I expect not. One needs to find someone who is critical enough of her reporting to recognize and then point out the omissions. An offer being "too good to turn down" doesn't necessarily indicate that money was the deciding factor, could be other things as well. Likely I'd say ...

Just to provide a little inkling of where this "stinking fish" could potentially be headed: TUNNELS AND TRUMP: THE MISSING DETAILS IN THE OATH KEEPER CONSPIRACY

Occupational hazard I suppose ... :tearsofjoy:

Is "your" the possessive form of "you" ? Asking for a friend ...

Not really ... she seems to have a little problem with omitting relevant facts that provide critical context.

Not before they hang it around the Republicans' necks ... it was their previous inaction and failure to do their duty that guaranteed the outcome. I don't think so ... but one is entitled to one's opinions. Well, the real digging hasn't even started yet on the Jan. 5th "war council" meeting...

Not even close.

I was referring to the use of Executive Orders to accomplish/set policy generally, not the specific policy issue itself.

As does Catherine herself.

LOL ... yeah, but ON WHAT ? :tearsofjoy: I'm guessing that it will be one of the s-l-o-w-e-s-t train wrecks we'll ever have the pleasure of witnessing. Drag it out for the rest of the year ... depositions, subpoenas, witness testimony ... the whole enchilada. :tearsofjoy: Did Chief...

That's certainly one way to characterize it. Fox News departure: Catherine Herridge joins CBS News, saying ‘facts matter’ Seems she wasn't above taking a shot at Fox's News operation on the way out though. Might not be all about money. Well, if you're inclined to believe her, so was her...

So it appears that we have at least one that is willing to be a potential witness at the Senate trial: Man who wore horns at riot willing to speak at Trump's trial I suspect he probably won't be the last. I do wonder if his offer is contingent on being able to wear the horns while he...