Search results

Good luck with that ... BTW - I like the jobs numbers. Best since October. :tearsofjoy:

Tell it to LDB ... :tearsofjoy:

I'll just leave this right here: AP poll puts Biden job approval at 60 percent :tearsofjoy:

And some never start at all ... :tearsofjoy:

Better that type of inspiration than this type: Trump appointee arrested in connection with Capitol riot Charging count of Trump rioters and wannabe treasonous insurgents now totals over 300 and the investigation is now starting to focus in connections to lawmakers. The FBI ain't gonna let...

Sorry ... not buying any gaslighting here ... :tearsofjoy:

Never underestimate the power of gerrymandering and laws geared to suppress the vote of targeted groups. Assuming a fair, level playing field, Republicans lose ... perhaps permanently - as admitted by their attorney before the Supreme Court recently: Republican Lawyer Admits GOP Needs Voter...

Sure ... :tearsofjoy: Election 2020 Favorability Ratings I like the recent trend line ... :tearsofjoy: Direction of County People have wised up - that's why they put Joe in office ... and the Dems in control of Congress. :tearsofjoy:

Yes - and the meaning of the text itself is quite clear. It means what it says ... and says what it means. And it says absolutely nothing whatsoever about being limited, or only applicable, to rebellion/insurrection of the Confederacy. The Confederacy and the War between the States is not...

Still trying to locate the relevant supporting document ... had it a bit ago but can't quite lay my fingers on it at the moment ...

Maybe he can figure out a way to time travel to escape justice ? :tearsofjoy:

That's not what I'm thinking at all.

Well, that's quite probably why it was originally passed of course, fortunately those doing the amending at the time didn't see fit to constrain it further with any words limiting its applicability to a single conflict. There is certainly nothing in the text constraining it solely to that ...

No - actually there's another - Article 3 of the 14th Amendment: Time to Reconsider the 14th Amendment for Trump’s Role in the Insurrection And, on reflection, that might be the easiest path of all. :tearsofjoy:

Again, appreciate the effort ... but that's not specificity I'm looking for.

That really doesn't address the specific question I asked with the details I'n looking for. But thanks anyways.

Yeah ... his Philly attorney was SO GOOD he couldn't even convince a simple majority to vote not guilty. :tearsofjoy:

Then, by all means, enjoy ...

Check back with us in say, oh I dunno ... four years ? I'm sure it will be interesting ... along with seeing what percentage of voters still identify as Republican ... :tearsofjoy:

Not only is it possible ... it just happened on live TV ... :tearsofjoy: