Search results

Those threats to Delegate Tran included death threats BTW. Why ? "Because we're pro-life !" Of course. ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯

Good. They need to explore all aspects to get to the bottom of what happened on Jan 6th ... even if it goes all the way to the top. Which, if I had to bet, it does.

And what information do you base that on ? Bannon's unhinged rantings ? Or was it the Pillow Guy ? :tearsofjoy:

Have some specific examples (with actual names of people affected) of what you're claiming is occurring ? Providing such, would enable further discussion ... and might just lead to a conversation ! Otherwise, you're just continuing to repeat vague claims that lack specificity.

Ok ... so not that guy then. Who specifically ? Got some names ? I don't know that, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if it were "illegal" to withhold "medical services" from people who have been incarcerated. Seems like it would be good public policy. Probably something that some on...

Read No. 7 "Last-chance strategic fighting" and note that "the police informed attackers that they would use lethal force" ...

No. :tearsofjoy:

This the guy you talking about ? New Jersey man allegedly assaulted multiple officers at Capitol riot, used 'chemical irritant' Or somebody else ? He another one of those "peaceful protestors" you keep referring to ? :tearsofjoy:

Want a shave and a haircut ? Visitation privileges ? Just get the jab:

#nojustsomederppropaganda ... out of a purported "survey" ... from the Heartland Institute of all places. :tearsofjoy: You following Representative Q-Bert now ? :tearsofjoy:

People who burn things down are not peaceful protestors. :tearsofjoy:

Muttly be all like: :tearsofjoy: Yeah, no ... your screen shot was not responsive to the request I made. Feel free to try again though. :tearsofjoy:

What does that (if true) have to do with what we've been discussing ? :tearsofjoy:

You keep trying to run that "earlier" business ... as though there wasn't ongoing violence occurring ... right up to the point where the rioters were pushed out of the Capitol around 5:30 - 6:00. It's weak and pretty lame ... as well as being fairly laughable. :tearsofjoy: I don't "lump them...

Doesn't much matter ... but yes, they were participating in an ongoing riot. The Jan 6th riot was an event that occurred over a number of hours. Just because some participant in the mob wasn't doing something at some particular point, doesn't mean that they are absolved for what took place at...

I already covered this, but knowing that repetition is necessary ... in at least some cases: It serves as a basis to refute the rather disingenuous claims of "We were just touristing !" ... and all other manner of whiny claims of how they should not be held accountable for what they did that...

Well, since you seem to be kind of slow in being able to figure what is actually going on there, allow me to explain: Similar to yourself, some of the riotous miscreants are offering up all sorts of excuses to excuse their conduct at the Capitol. Prosecutors a rebutting their claims by showing...

You misspelled rioters ... again. :tearsofjoy:

Not in and of itself. It is evidence that they were aware of what was going on (violence committed to gain entry to a restricted area) For most normal sane people that would be a tip-off that maybe something wasn't entirely copacetic. For MAGA's not so much apparently. :tearsofjoy:

If there is, is it your position that the police should have then used force to prevent entry ? If so, I'm liking that train of thought. Just what sort of force would be necessary for a few cops to repel a violent mob, consisting of hundreds - if not thousands - of individuals ? :tearsofjoy: