Search results

Will be interesting to see if Enrique Tarrio - the Proud Boys leader - shows up on those. He was there shortly before January 6th (day before ?) ... not clear if he was an actual "guest" ... or was just breezed through as part of a "tour" ...

Nah ... he's just doing a little professional commentary - as someone who has significant relevant experience (unlike Jarrett) - on the hack idiocy being vomited out by Jarrett. Nothing particularly partisan about it. :tearsofjoy:

One can only have admiration on how some are able to maintain their sense of humor. I do have to say that it looks like Greg cleaned up real well ... after the substance abuse treatment ... One day at a time. :tearsofjoy:

Meanwhile in other news, intrepid reporter Scott MacFarlane - who has been all over the events on Jan 6th - busts Oath Keeper Head Stewie Rhodes for filing a motion in Federal Court in his pretrial detention case which contains demonstrably false claims as to a key point with regard to timing...

And for a very good reason: Durham is conflicted. :tearsofjoy: Well I think we can definitely rule out apolitical and fair. :tearsofjoy: And disciplined is looking pretty dicey at this point as well. :tearsofjoy: There is certainly a good case for sloppy though ... however, in all...

Yeah ... there is that as well. ;)

I'll just leave this (Sussman's response to Durham's latest "filing") here: https://pacer-documents.s3.amazonaws.com/36/235637/04519052327.pdf Highly unethical conduct for a US Prosecutor ... let alone a Special Counsel. Sad how far Little Johnny Durham has fallen. :tearsofjoy:

Have you got her now ? :tearsofjoy:

That's seems to be that particular individual's opinion, yes. But I suspect that it really isn't a question of "NOW" for Josh ... he's probably had concerns going all the way back to Durham's CIA investigations. :tearsofjoy: What should be embarrassing is the unwillingness to read the NYT...

I think Eric is almost in tears ... :tearsofjoy:

Patience grasshopper ... you'll get your coverage. Sadly for you and the other Righty Tighties it won't be the the demonstrably false and misleading garbage that the RWNJ media is spewing. Incoming: I'd say read the Times article - since it points out the problems with Durham's filing (and...

And yet he ran through Attorney Generals until he finally found one that was unethical and toady enough to do his bidding and appoint a Special Counsel which the AG then tasked with a fool's errand of chasing unhinged conspiracy theories emanating out of rightwing media for purposes of smearing...

Little Johnny Durham gets The Sussman Slapdown via a court filing in reply to his previous filing: :tearsofjoy:

Ruh-roh ... :oops: :tearsofjoy:

UNFAIR !!! :tearsofjoy:

Nope - that was back before the District was established. It was drained and made habitable when it became the seat of our Government. :tearsofjoy:

Pot meet kettle ? :tearsofjoy:

Nope. :tearsofjoy: If it had happened (and it didn't) it would depend on the exact nature of what you are calling spying ... OSI and opposition research are not "spying" in the sense that you are likely using it. :tearsofjoy:

Fake News ! :tearsofjoy:

"... the Durham "report" ..." :tearsofjoy: It wasn't a report ... it was a filing in a court case ... a case which may well be dismissed in fairly short order. That's why Durham made the filing ... he's knows what's coming (a motion to dismiss by Sussman - which could very well be granted)...