Search results

Apparently you have absolutely no clue as to how Special Counsels work. Suggest you read up on it: Special counsel Not necessarily. Your cite of "Julie Kelly" ( :joycat: ) lacks the full context of what Garland actually said ... so it's pretty much impossible to say for certain what the AG...

Sure he does. Not always the case. You misspelled "unAmerican criminal" above. SC Smith previously served in the DOJ (with distinction) ... serving as an assistant U.S. attorney, acting U.S. attorney, and head of the department's Public Integrity Section. Prior to that he was an assistant...

So what ?

Whataboutery ... about the whataboutery ? :oops: :joycat:

That more of a testament of just how deranged the Republican Party of Michigan is than anything else. :joycat:

So what ? :joycat:

... because Whack-a-doodle Wingnut "legal theories" aren't law ? :joycat: They don't apply. Seems like maybe you might want to look up who Archibald Cox and Leon Jaworski were ... ? If those two don't handle it for you, there's a literal laundry list of others I can cite. It appears (on...

The last of which happened in ... (wait for it) ... 1988 ... :joycat: If that's a concern you ought to be more worried about the unhealthy fatso wolfing down all those hamberders ... :joycat: The Congress doesn't "enact the 25th Amendment" ... it was already "enacted". That isn't how it...

Bzzzzt ... wrong: 28 CFR § 600.1 - Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel. :joycat: Be interesting to see how the unqualified judge he appointed handles that ... :joycat:

:clapping-happy: It's his call ... ;) Yup. That presumes quite a bit.

:joycat: #surejan :joycat: Yeah ... they had nearly 300,000 vote for someone that isn't the presumptive front-runner ... a substantial portion of which may not be willing to vote for him once he becomes the eventual nominee. Clearly a much better situation ... :clapping-happy: :joycat:

Well sure ... presuming he actually had a legitimate basis for doing so ... Without full insight into what DOJ had uncovered in their investigation of Jan 6th - which it is safe to say neither you or I have even now - or how long it took to do so, it's hard to say whether there was a valid...

Seems like maybe they didn't quite think it all the way through ... :dash2:

SC Smith warning Trump's biased Judge she can maybe expect yet another slapdown from the 11th Circuit ... if she doesn't correct the errors in her rulings: Jack Smith fires a shot across Aileen Cannon's bow over 'clear error' :clapping-happy:

SCOTUS is hearing it on an expedited basis, the schedule isn't all that "slow". What was slow was them taking it up. They should have taken it when the SC sought to have them hear it ... but being reluctant to get involved they didn't take it at that point. To their credit, they seem to have...

Fully !!! ... with a bullet ... and a checkmark, cubed ! ... • ... ∛ :joycat:

:joycat: In order for Judge Cannon to remain prudent and cautious, she would have to have a history of behaving that way. Not much evidence of that ... at least that I have seen. Fun Fact: Judge Cannon's husband worked (works ?) for a Mafia mobster: Being mobbed up is neither prudent or...

Tell me you don't understand "checks and balances" in our government ... without actually saying it. :clapping-happy: :joycat:

Not entirely a surprise ... remember Special Counsel sought their ruling on the matter ... ;) Some interesting wording in their order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022824zr3_febh.pdf

More like Dark Brandon's "Operation Nikki" ... :joycat: