Search results

Maybe - but the mud slinging has barely begun. With 17 [is that right?] candidates on the R ticket, there could be a pole sucker among them. Or maybe that's what Hillary's hiding in those emails....;)

I'm not a fan of sign on bonuses either. I feel it rewards people for walking in the door, rather than the people who have been working with you for years. Reward those who have earned it, by helping make your business a success, and you won't have any trouble recruiting. :)

I understand the "tone" of those vids is pretty shocking to people, but if you were a fly on the wall anywhere that death is a part of the work, you'd understand that the attitude is part of coping with it. These vids prove that PP is doing precisely what they are legally authorized to do, and...

Sorry, Windsor, had no clue you were joking - too many similar comments that weren't have been posted here over the years. Like "the Democrat smear machine", which, coming on the heels of the "expose" of Planned Parenthood by an Operation Roger funded group of extremists is just hilarious.

Like the current snide comments about Margaret Sanger [the founder of Planned Parenthood, basically], you need to judge them in the context of their own time, not ours. And I don't believe they had anything to do with burning witches, that was a religious group, though it may certainly have...

It's not because of a bias towards legislators and judges, it's because they can wreck lives in the course of their employment, same as any truck driver. I'd like to know they take that responsibility seriously, but some of their work product makes me wonder.

It's also not unusual to walk quite some distance just looking for the Shipping/Receiving office, or anyone who even knows where it is. Or anyone at all, lol. If you park at a truck stop, the front lot is often ok, but when you park at a WalMart, you need to be as far from the store as...

"Lead by example"? So why aren't state & federal legislators required to be dug tested? Or judges? I guess the example is "Do as we say, not as we do", as usual. :mad:

When people are barred from employment, how might they 'support' themselves? By turning to crime: theft, burglary, purse snatching - doesn't that concern us? It concerns me, because I don't want to be victimized by someone who needs to steal to eat. It's getting harder to justify treating...

That's not true. Along with an affirmative reply to the use of drugs, they must also answer whether they have lost or been denied a job due to illegal drug usage, and any legal trouble due to same. They could lie, but there will be a paper trail to contradict them, every time. Random tests...

Also, this is his first 'campaign'. Let's wait until he's been through as many as Hillary, and see how he feels about them then.

That's true. But there are many who would go to treatment, if it were available. As it isn't, they go to jail instead. Maybe the resistant ones could be sentenced to just take Narcan every day, under supervision. Or maybe a long acting form could be developed. In any case, jailing addicts is...

If you believe there is good reason to drug test welfare applicants, you've missed what happened when 7 different states tried it. [Because one was maybe a fluke, right?] Facts really screw with a good fantasy - if you pay attention to them, that is. :rolleyes...

Must be static on your screen [ there's a great joke in there, lol], because it's clear on mine - even with the green background. :watching:

Stop paying businesses incentives to do what they will do anyway. Stop spending public funds on megazillion dollar sports arenas. Stop passing legislation that is guaranteed to be taken to court. Stop repeating the errors of others [like drug testing welfare applicants]. There's plenty of...

Prescriptions come with preprinted info now, but years [a lot of years] ago, they did not. We didn't even get the info on side effects, because it existed only in extremely tiny print on the package insert, which we didn't get, ever. The doc or pharmacist might mention some of the more common...

It's good to see the focus shifting from texting to distraction. People need to know that any form of distraction can be deadly, when driving.

Damifino, but if we got the users into treatment, the dealers would be out of business.

Going off topic is one thing, but that kind of temptation for Ragman to illustrate is bad form, lol. And no, we don't need to see the commercial, either! :eek:

Don't think I've ever heard her use it either, I am a huge fan of British humor. I just wish I'd been more familiar with it when my kids were little, so I could say "Don't be so bloody daft!" lol. [Parents need to be creative about swearing.] ;)