Search results

I like Murray!

We can tell. :p

Really? Ya just had to go political with this! There is nothing political about this situation. I know many conservatives believe as I do and many liberals as you do ( Oh those poor souls ).

Bump. With all the new members since this thread was first started, I thought it would be interesting to hear from them.

Ummmmmmmmmmmm!

Dang! ..............

I always hold the door open for who ever is behind me, where ever I am.

Congrats! May you earn lots of money with it. ;)

4 guys beating on 1 is mob rule to me.

That's not a fair comparison. The thief in the OP was not in somebodys home, he was breaking into trailers. The police should have been called after he was subdued, instead he was beaten to death. Mob rule is just wrong no matter how it is sugar coated.

And dare I say it, George Harrison and Ringo Starr.

Nope . . . Wrong . . . Wrong . . . Nobody ever said not to punish criminals, and punish severely. The problem we have here is other members feel DEATH!!! is the answer to everything. Is that the type of rule of law we want to live under? I sure don't!

That's crazy! Why would you want to pay unnecessary taxes on a non-existent profit?

If the system is broken, we need to get involved and fix it. Nothing else matters.

Sorry, I couldn't resist.

Beating a man to death is not the answer. Yes, the system is broken, but resorting to mob rule does nothing to fix things.

No, it is not ok to steal, give me more credit than that! According to the article stated 3 or 4 men were able to subdue him. Was it necessary to beat him to death? At some time during the beating, it must have been obvious he was not armed.