What is missing here? This "story" seems to have a few "holes" in it. A man is on trial for rape, the only "proof" of this rape, at least that is mentioned in this "story", is an essay, written by his step-daughter. The essay about the "rape" was written 10 years after the abuse was supposed to have taken place. The article mentions no evidence, other than the essay.
Now, IF this man DID rape this girl, he should rot in prison for it. There is no excuse for rape. I just wonder how, if the essay it the ONLY "proof" of this rape that it ever even went to trail in the first place.
Is this just another example of poor reporting? Something is just not right with the story has presented.
[h=1]NY man on trial for rape accusations in stepdaughter's college essay[/h]
"NEW YORK (Reuters) - A jury on Wednesday deliberated the fate of a New York man on trial for rape after his stepdaughter wrote in her college application essay about being sexually abused by him as a child"
http://news.yahoo.com/ny-man-trial-rape-accusations-stepdaughters-college-essay-173900641.html
Now, IF this man DID rape this girl, he should rot in prison for it. There is no excuse for rape. I just wonder how, if the essay it the ONLY "proof" of this rape that it ever even went to trail in the first place.
Is this just another example of poor reporting? Something is just not right with the story has presented.
[h=1]NY man on trial for rape accusations in stepdaughter's college essay[/h]
"NEW YORK (Reuters) - A jury on Wednesday deliberated the fate of a New York man on trial for rape after his stepdaughter wrote in her college application essay about being sexually abused by him as a child"
http://news.yahoo.com/ny-man-trial-rape-accusations-stepdaughters-college-essay-173900641.html
