Voter fraud

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Maybe they should just do away with the absentee votes?.....and maybe have more advanced voter days?.....
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
advanced and absentee is not much difference...someone isn't going to be home on election day....either vacation or planned surgery or whatever reasons...
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I always vote in the early voting just to be sure Murphy can't interfere. And I show them my voter registration card and my photo ID, like everyone should be mandated to do by law, along with proof of legitimate non-amnesty citizenship.
 

wimpy007

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
US Army
Ziggi, thats the Chicago way, more dead people vote in Chicago in all the elections.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
"Danzey, it turned out, had won the in-person vote by a hundred votes, 343-243. But Newsome had carried a whopping 96% of the absentee vote, winning 119 of the 124 ballots cast by mail."

8IyKd4G4.jpg

"That's how it's dun, comrades."
 
  • Like
Reactions: RLENT

xiggi

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Please cite those instances where anyone here [or anywhere, for that matter] says voter fraud never, ever happens.:rolleyes:

You posted the following on March 9.

The attempts to "reduce voter fraud" are transparent attempts to influence elections, because voter fraud is a make believe issue, with zero evidence to support it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muttly and Pilgrim

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
You posted the following on March 9.

The attempts to "reduce voter fraud" are transparent attempts to influence elections, because voter fraud is a make believe issue, with zero evidence to support it.

The make believe issue is that voter fraud occurs in any form that is substantial enough to require new regulations on the scale proposed. It's the same as drug testing welfare recipients: the fact that 2 or 3 [out of thousands] are guilty doesn't justify the laws proposed to eliminate it - that's the 'make believe' part. Until and unless it can be shown that voter fraud exists on a scale to warrant new restrictions, the issue is a make believe one, contrived to influence elections. And there's zero evidence to support it.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The make believe part is anyone objecting to a requirement to show a legal photo ID when voting. You know, the same photo ID required for so many other activities in life. The one that's no big deal at all in any of those other activities. The one nobody objects to being required for any other activity. But liberals lose their minds when an ID is required for voting. That and the idea that 2 or 3 out of thousands or any number other than zero is acceptable.
 

xiggi

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
The make believe issue is that voter fraud occurs in any form that is substantial enough to require new regulations on the scale proposed. It's the same as drug testing welfare recipients: the fact that 2 or 3 [out of thousands] are guilty doesn't justify the laws proposed to eliminate it - that's the 'make believe' part. Until and unless it can be shown that voter fraud exists on a scale to warrant new restrictions, the issue is a make believe one, contrived to influence elections. And there's zero evidence to support it.
umm I believe zero means zero. It's a little late to twist your words now. But in response please excuse me when I say anyone who tries to argue against voter ID is well an idiot for lack of a better term. Imho of course.
 
Last edited:

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The make believe part is anyone objecting to a requirement to show a legal photo ID when voting. You know, the same photo ID required for so many other activities in life. The one that's no big deal at all in any of those other activities. The one nobody objects to being required for any other activity. But liberals lose their minds when an ID is required for voting. That and the idea that 2 or 3 out of thousands or any number other than zero is acceptable.
I actually agree with @LBD.
One should have to prove they are who they say they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
I agree only to the extent that valid I.D. should be required.

Having said that however, the State, having imposed such a requirement, bears a responsibility to ensure that anyone entitled to vote, be provided with such an I.D. ... for free if they can't afford it.
 

xiggi

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
I think most if not all states do provide a free ID if needed. I agree with you on that they should provide it free if needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muttly

aristotle

Veteran Expediter
I think most if not all states do provide a free ID if needed. I agree with you on that they should provide it free if needed.
Several states will provide a mobile task force which will come to the home of anyone wanting a valid state issued photo ID, free of charge. This is done to accommodate the request of any person who declares obtaining a valid photo ID is a financial or logistical hardship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muttly

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
My heavens yes. We certainly shouldn't expect anyone to pay the three fourths (3/4) of one penny per day cost of obtaining their own identification ($16/6yrs) under age 60 or the $6 lifetime if 60 or over. They have important things to buy with their money like alcohol, drugs, tobacco, rims etc. etc.. Don't bother, because you either know there are huge numbers doing just that or you should know. Yes, there may be a few who need assistance and everyone should have the opportunity to vote but ONLY if they are a legal citizen with proof and amnesty citizens shouldn't be given the privilege of voting because they illegally became citizens. Don't bother there either.
 
Top