Unimopassioned Reporting?

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Here's an AP story that carefully crafts the narrative to be significantly slanted in favor of the gun control folks. Not only that, but they do it in such a way as to subliminally suggest to those same gun control folks that they should target a particular gun maker. Notice how the paragraphs are laid out, and which ones are designed to stand out. Also notice that there's like 6 paragraphs about the story, and the rest is about the gun maker and about making a case for gun control in the gun control debate. Travis Loller and the AP should be ashamed of themselves, but they aren't.

5-year-old boy shoots 2-year-old sister in Ky.
By TRAVIS LOLLER, Associated Press

BURKESVILLE, Ky. (AP) — A 5-year-old boy accidentally shot his 2-year-old sister to death in rural southern Kentucky with a rifle he had received as a gift last year, authorities said.

The children's mother was home at the time of the shooting Tuesday afternoon but had stepped out to the front porch for a few minutes and "she heard the gun go off," Cumberland County Coroner Gary White said. He said the rifle was kept in a corner and the family didn't realize a bullet was left inside it.

White told the Lexington Herald-Leader the boy received the .22-caliber rifle as a gift.

"It's a Crickett," White said, referring to a company that specifically makes guns, clothes and books for children. "It's a little rifle for a kid. ... The little boy's used to shooting the little gun."


The shooting, while accidental, highlights a cultural divide in the gun debate. While many suburban and urban areas work to keep guns out of the hands of children, it's not uncommon for youths in rural areas to own guns for target practice and hunting.


"Down in Kentucky where we're from, you know, guns are passed down from generation to generation. You start at a young age with guns for hunting and everything," White said Wednesday. What is more unusual than a child having a gun, he said, is "that a kid would get shot with it."


"Accidents happen with guns. They thought the gun was actually unloaded, and it wasn't," the coroner said.


White said the girl died of a single gunshot wound to the chest area.


In a brief news release, state police said the shooting occurred when the boy was "playing" with the rifle, but did not elaborate. It is not clear whether any charges will be filed, said Kentucky State Police spokesman Trooper Billy Gregory.

"I think it's too early to say whether there will or won't be," Gregory said.
The AP is not identifying the children because of their ages.

The company that made the gun, Milton, Pa.-based Keystone Sporting Arms, produced 60,000 Crickett and Chipmunk rifles in 2008, according to its website. It also makes guns for adults, but most of its products are geared toward children. The smaller guns come in all sorts of colors, including blue and pink.


The company's slogan is "my first rifle" and its website has a "Kids Corner" section where pictures of young boys and girls are displayed, most of them showing the children at shooting ranges and on bird and deer hunts. The smaller rifles are sold with a mount to use at a shooting range.


"The goal of KSA is to instill gun safety in the minds of youth shooters and encourage them to gain the knowledge and respect that hunting and shooting activities require and deserve," the website said.


No one at the company answered the phone Wednesday.


According to its website, Bill McNeal and his son Steve McNeal decided to make guns for young shooters in the mid-1990s and opened Keystone in 1996 with just four employees, producing 4,000 rifles that year. It now employs about 70 people.


Burkesville sits near the Tennessee-Kentucky state line along the Cumberland River, among the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains. The small city is about 90 miles northeast of Nashville, Tenn.


It is home to a Mennonite community that gained attention in 2010 when nine of its members were killed in a head-on collision with a tractor-trailer.
 

Slo-Ride

Veteran Expediter
I don't get why the Manufacture would be brought into the story other then to make/feed another story. They had nothing to do with the accident. He should have stopped after reporting what happened and then created another story if chose to do so. A comment from the state police or the corner would have been enough to add, but no reason to bring up the other stuff unless they have a hidden story/agenda to tell themselves.
 

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Here's an AP story that carefully crafts the narrative to be significantly slanted in favor of the gun control folks. Not only that, but they do it in such a way as to subliminally suggest to those same gun control folks that they should target a particular gun maker. Notice how the paragraphs are laid out, and which ones are designed to stand out. Also notice that there's like 6 paragraphs about the story, and the rest is about the gun maker and about making a case for gun control in the gun control debate. Travis Loller and the AP should be ashamed of themselves, but they aren't.


What a nice post. A position taken with no hatred.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The children's mother was home at the time of the shooting Tuesday afternoon but had stepped out to the front porch for a few minutes

Wonder if they're going to blame the tobacco company also or just the rifle manufacturer?

A media source writing a story with a negative slant toward guns? Surprising. :rolleyes:
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Wonder if they're going to blame the tobacco company also or just the rifle manufacturer?
What tobacco company ?

Is this tobacco company in any way similar in nature (like say ... fictitious ?) to that dastardly women who abandoned her baby on the beach ... but actually didn't ? :rolleyes:
 

Brisco

Expert Expediter
....and I bet Obawa's people are already all over this for his next News Conference discussing Gun Control Legislation that his Senate is desperately trying to revive.
 

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Well.....except for the author of the article who "hates" guns. ;)
Come on dave, you know what I mean.It's ok to hate a thing. I'm objecting to the constant mean spirited, hateful name calling that goes on. Take a position, any position, it can be debated for or against without calling somebody a murderer or moron.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
If we're not going to call a murderer a murderer or a moron a moron then what are we going to call murderers and morons? Oh, I get it. You want gentle speak code words like Affirmative Action and Women's Reproductive Rights.
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
Come on dave, you know what I mean.It's ok to hate a thing. I'm objecting to the constant mean spirited, hateful name calling that goes on. Take a position, any position, it can be debated for or against without calling somebody a murderer or moron.

I know what you mean. Just a matter of balance.
 

Hightech_Hobo

Expert Expediter
"Balance"......seems to be a lost attribute these days....While Obama is not my favorite president, it seems that all is his fault...

There is a new culture out there..It seem one is chastized unless he goes all the way to one side of the spectrum or the other...

While there is a need for all you "Black and whiters"....seems to me we need a few more who stay in the grey and see both sides of the story.....

....just one mans opinion......
 

xiggi

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
If we're not going to call a murderer a murderer or a moron a moron then what are we going to call murderers and morons? Oh, I get it. You want gentle speak code words like Affirmative Action and Women's Reproductive Rights.

I have known a number of women who had to make the very difficult decision to abort a pregnancy over the years. Honestly i resent you or anyone else for referring to them as murderers without having the first clue about why they chose that path or anything about what kind of person they really are.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using EO Forums mobile app
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
I'm 100% behind the right to bear arms, and the right [make that the obligation] to teach children to handle them safely - but a 5 year old is simply incapable of appreciating the finality of real, actual death.
If there's any morons in this story, it's the parents who "didn't realize there was a bullet in the rifle". It's their freakin job to know it! How can they teach gun safety if they don't practice it?!
:mad:
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
"Balance"......seems to be a lost attribute these days....While Obama is not my favorite president, it seems that all is his fault...

There is a new culture out there..It seem one is chastized unless he goes all the way to one side of the spectrum or the other...

While there is a need for all you "Black and whiters"....seems to me we need a few more who stay in the grey and see both sides of the story.....

....just one mans opinion......

That is true and at least what I attempt here. Sometimes successfully and others times not so much. As for politics, there is no balance. It is all about winning.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Actually the doctor is the true murderer although the woman is certainly involved.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
That is true and at least what I attempt here. Sometimes successfully and others times not so much. As for politics, there is no balance. It is all about winning.
"Pragmatic" is my middle name.

OK, not really. But I do try to be as pragmatic, objective and dialectic as humanly possible. In most debatable issues there are always two sides, and frequently about a dozen other sides that fall somewhere in between the two. It's important to open your mind, not just to someone else's opinion, but to the very scary thought that your opinion might not be the correct one. That's a tough thing to do. But I've found over the years that being open to being wrong has enabled me to learn an awful lot.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
If we're not going to call a murderer a murderer or a moron a moron then what are we going to call murderers and morons? Oh, I get it. You want gentle speak code words like Affirmative Action and Women's Reproductive Rights.
By all means, call a murderer a murderer and a moron a moron. There's nothing wrong with that. The problem comes when some people (that would be you) tend to make their whole point about little more than than the exercise of using emotional language in calling the murderer a murderer and the moron a moron instead of being an intelligent discourse in who murdered whom and why, and what makes someone is a moron. It also helps if the actions of the murderer is actually murder as defined by society at large and not by someone with an agenda to promote, and if the moron is actually a moron instead of someone who thinks or acts differently than you'd like. So, when you use emotional rhetoric ineffectively in the manner in which you often do, instead of thought-out intelligent discourse, you come off sounding like Charlie Brown's teacher.



EDIT: I'm just sayin' :D
 
Last edited:
Top