U.S. proposes cellphone ban for truck drivers

Shah786

Seasoned Expediter
The U.S. government on Friday proposed prohibiting commercial truck and bus drivers from using cellphones while behind the wheel.

The Transportation Department rule would affect approximately 4 million drivers, who are already banned by the government from texting while working.

The proposal is the latest move in Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood's stepped-up campaign against distracted driving in which he has questioned cellphone use in passenger cars and "hands free" communications technology.

"Every time a commercial truck or bus driver takes his or her eyes off the road to use a cellphone, even for a few seconds, the driver places everyone around them at risk," LaHood said in a statement.

Nearly 5,000 people were killed and another 500,000 were hurt in crashes of all vehicles involving a distracted driver in 2009, government safety figures show.

Inattention was a factor in 9 percent of large truck crashes, which fell overall in 2009 from the previous year. Most truck crashes involve collisions with other vehicles.

Fatal bus crashes jumped from 20 to 38 in 2009.

Between 6 percent and 13 percent of bus crashes were linked to inattention, according to a National Transportation Safety Board investigation of those types of accidents between 1998-2008.

Many big transport companies, like UPS Inc and Wal-Mart Stores Inc, already prohibit drivers from using a cellphone while operating their trucks.

The cellphone proposal is subject to a 60-day comment period before being finalized.
 

Desperado

Seasoned Expediter
does that also mean that companys will be band from calling us and giving us black marks from not answering the phones
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Well, according to the proposal, companies won't be banned from calling us, but if they do then they will be ipso facto encouraging cell phone use by drivers, and will be guilty of willingly allowing drivers to use cell phones, and would then be subject to serious fines. So unless the carriers know for sure we're not moving when they call, they probably won't call.

I just more or less permanently wear a BT headset. I look rad. :D
 

Desperado

Seasoned Expediter
i have a bluetooth cb butits still a distaction to talk and explane to a dispacher 5 or 6 times befor they come up with a solition
 

guido4475

Not a Member
This is where I think it is time for the carriers to step up to the plate and show the feds the disadvantages of this ban/rule.We already cant use the q-c, in most cases, while driving.Going back to the old days of having to pull over and call from the side of the road, or wherever...That'll greaten the chances of an accident right there!
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
I heard somewhere LaHood mentioning that everything in the cab is a distraction and it should be all eliminated. This includes radio, CB, iPod, iPhone, GPS units, pretty much everything.

It is like the sleep apnea issue, there is no data that supports the fatigue of the driver in an accident caused by weight related issues or sleep problems but they are pushing it to the point that they are now getting into that area of medical privacy.

It makes one wonder what stock he owns?
 

guido4475

Not a Member
I heard somewhere LaHood mentioning that everything in the cab is a distraction and it should be all eliminated. This includes radio, CB, iPod, iPhone, GPS units, pretty much everything.

It is like the sleep apnea issue, there is no data that supports the fatigue of the driver in an accident caused by weight related issues or sleep problems but they are pushing it to the point that they are now getting into that area of medical privacy.

It makes one wonder what stock he owns?

Stocks in the choo-choo companies? All aboard?
 

ftp000

Expert Expediter
I heard somewhere LaHood mentioning that everything in the cab is a distraction and it should be all eliminated. This includes radio, CB, iPod, iPhone, GPS units, pretty much everything.

It is like the sleep apnea issue, there is no data that supports the fatigue of the driver in an accident caused by weight related issues or sleep problems but they are pushing it to the point that they are now getting into that area of medical privacy.

It makes one wonder what stock he owns?


They can have my XM radio when they pry it from my cold dead hands.



Posted with my Droid EO Forum App
 

CharlesD

Expert Expediter
People who can't pay good enough attention to their driving are always going to get distracted, no matter what apparatus is at hand to facilitate it. Take everything out of the cab and those kind of drivers are likely to get distracted by cows or something.
 

moose

Veteran Expediter
It makes one wonder what stock he owns?

simple ,
3,000,000 drivers ,forced to invest 300$ in a voice command dialing .
that's over a billion $ ,when all taxes are paid for.
works well for the stimulus administration .

you see,when they make it a rule ,they are bypassing the law making procedure .with it's annoying part of the 'small business impact study' .
nothing new here ,they makes rules without making the funds available to pay for them .
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Will the OOIDA and other organizations put up a fight?

The rules procedure is not being followed for the medical issues either, the advisory boards are making recommendations and then the DOT is following them without going through the review process but just implementing them through their guidelines which are not always a binding regulation.
 
Top