danthewolf00
Veteran Expediter
Sad thing is Democrats make Russians look happy...."Russia if you're listening" Dems: Lets investigate Trump.
Sad thing is Democrats make Russians look happy...."Russia if you're listening" Dems: Lets investigate Trump.
Don’t some people inherit money that isn't counted as income like life insurance?So I was watching Fox news last night, and the Five were talking about the IRS rules that are being proposed, and they either dont understand what is being talked about or they are outright lying.
They keep saying that the IRS wants to be notified of any transaction over $600, that is not true. The law already states that if a company pays someone over $600 they must issues a 1099 to the person and send it to the IRS.
What they what is to total the amount of deposits and withdrawals for each account so they can match it up to what is being reported for income. If you show 40k income and have 80k in deposits, that is going to raise a red flag.
Exactly, there are plenty of times when there will be extra money that is deposited but considered non-taxable, that is however very easy to prove.Don’t some people inherit money that isn't counted as income like life insurance?
I agree but you know the people at the top of the food chain will never allow that since they will be the ones who pay more taxes, the screwed up rules benefit them.Democrats always want more taxes and Republicans always want to balance the budget....you don't need 500 more irs agents just switch to a flat tax and simplify the tax code so the average American can understand it without a college degree in tax code.
That's the 'distraction" talking point. That's the "nothing to see here, move along" talking point. The IRS won't be notified of individual transactions over $600, but they will be notified of total annual transaction amounts of the total amount of money that went in and out of bank, loan and investment accounts if those accounts hold a value of at least $600, or if the total is at least $600 in a year.They keep saying that the IRS wants to be notified of any transaction over $600, that is not true. The law already states that if a company pays someone over $600 they must issues a 1099 to the person and send it to the IRS.
So I was watching Fox news last night, and the Five were talking about the IRS rules that are being proposed, and they either dont understand what is being talked about or they are outright lying.
They keep saying that the IRS wants to be notified of any transaction over $600, that is not true. The law already states that if a company pays someone over $600 they must issues a 1099 to the person and send it to the IRS.
What they what is to total the amount of deposits and withdrawals for each account so they can match it up to what is being reported for income. If you show 40k income and have 80k in deposits, that is going to raise a red flag.
But wait...there's more!That's the 'distraction" talking point. That's the "nothing to see here, move along" talking point. The IRS won't be notified of individual transactions over $600, but they will be notified of total annual transaction amounts of the total amount of money that went in and out of bank, loan and investment accounts if those accounts hold a value of at least $600, or if the total is at least $600 in a year.
They claim it's to prevent the ultra wealthy from having multiple accounts and playing a shell game with their money. But it allows the IRS to compare all money in and out of all of your accounts with the tax return to see if an audit should take place. But it also gives the IRS access to your individual transactions if they want to take a closer look, if your bank account has ever had more than $600 flowing in or out.
Some media outlets have focused on eBay and Etsy sellers, again, as a distraction, noting the current law has a threshold of 200 transactions and $20,000 before the IRS is notified and you have to report that income. The new proposal is $600. So this will prevent those ultra wealthy eBay sellers from avoiding paying taxes on their hidden income, as all of their banking and financial accounts will be added together.
But basically, if you claim adjusted gross income of $50,000 a year but spent & 60,000 on stuff, the IRS wants a closer look at your transactions.
The people who they are trying to catch in lies with this law are already laughing at it, if they have not already figured a way around it, they will.That's the 'distraction" talking point. That's the "nothing to see here, move along" talking point. The IRS won't be notified of individual transactions over $600, but they will be notified of total annual transaction amounts of the total amount of money that went in and out of bank, loan and investment accounts if those accounts hold a value of at least $600, or if the total is at least $600 in a year.
They claim it's to prevent the ultra wealthy from having multiple accounts and playing a shell game with their money. But it allows the IRS to compare all money in and out of all of your accounts with the tax return to see if an audit should take place. But it also gives the IRS access to your individual transactions if they want to take a closer look, if your bank account has ever had more than $600 flowing in or out.
Some media outlets have focused on eBay and Etsy sellers, again, as a distraction, noting the current law has a threshold of 200 transactions and $20,000 before the IRS is notified and you have to report that income. The new proposal is $600. So this will prevent those ultra wealthy eBay sellers from avoiding paying taxes on their hidden income, as all of their banking and financial accounts will be added together.
But basically, if you claim adjusted gross income of $50,000 a year but spent & 60,000 on stuff, the IRS wants a closer look at your transactions.
No as always they are exempt from the laws they frost onto us.Does this cover the house and the senate members
No as always they are exempt from the laws they frost onto us.
That's pretty funny. The author is whining about how conservatives pounced on the news to cast doubt, but the MSM, including the author's own NYT, said Powell's death proves that its even more important to get the vaccine, especially the booster shots, because if he can die while being vaccinated then people who are unvaccinated have no shot at survival.
I think fits in the "fake news" thread.