The Bully In the White House

tbubster

Seasoned Expediter
seems like it has a bit of truth to it

Throughout his frenetic jobs tour across the West this week, President Obama tried to seize the narrative. Republicans, he told champagne-sipping Hollywood moguls and tech titans, are intolerant bigots, know-nothings and thugs. They’ve made his hair “grayer” and left him “all dinged up.”

But who’s battering whom? Since Day One, Obama has been the Chicago bully in victim’s clothing. The mask is wearing thin.

Related Stories
White House, Ford Deny Claim That Bailout Ad Was Pulled Under PressureRelated Video

White House Denies Ford Ad Allegations

Did administration force automaker to pull anti-bailout commercial?

On Tuesday, Detroit News reporter Daniel Howes reported that White House officials leaned on Ford Motor Co. to yank a popular TV and Internet ad critical of competitors who took federal bailout money.

According to Howes, “Ford pulled the ad after individuals inside the White House” questioned CEO Alan Mulally. Howes concluded: “You’re not allowed, in Obama’s America, to disparage the auto bailout, or -- indirectly -- Obama. Especially during the election cycle.”

Both Ford and the White House officially deny any political pressure received or applied. But White House press flack Dan Pfeiffer refused to answer when I asked him whether anyone at the White House had ever contacted anyone at Ford to complain about the bailout ad.

Chris McDaniel, the real-life Ford customer who starred in the offending ad, told BigGovernment.com editor Larry O’Connor that he was exasperated when he heard about the Ford fiasco: “Now we have the federal government butting their nose into this TV ad. Another example of them getting involved in things they have no business getting involved in. Where is the free speech of American citizens?”

A left-wing Washington Post writer immediately scoffed at concerns about the administration’s heavy hand because the Ford fiasco “is being denied by the parties on both sides.” Must be nice to mainline White House talking points for a living. For the rest of us, reality intrudes.

This is the administration that pummeled companies such as Deere, Caterpillar, Verizon and AT&T for speaking out about the cost implications and financial burdens of ObamaCare -- and then cheered from the sidelines while Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman attempted to haul the firms up for a congressional witch-hunt inquisition.

This is the administration that has seized Gibson Guitars’ instruments and has threatened whistleblowers who exposed bloody corruption and incompetence behind the Operation Fast and Furious gun-walking racket.

And lest they need a reminder, this is an administration that has clamped down on mainstream media reporters, too:

* The Pleasanton (Calif.) Weekly was bullied by the White House press shop over a benign article that irked the administration because it made Michelle Obama look snooty.

* The San Francisco Chronicle was punished by the White House because a print pool reporter used a cellphone to record video of protesters at an Obama Bay Area fund-raiser.

* A WFAA-TV Texas reporter was dressed down by the president for having the audacity to interrupt.

* The Boston Herald was spanked by the White House for running a front-page op-ed by GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney.

The White House denied any pressure in all those cases, too.

Before his campaign finance-grubbing swing ended, Obama met the pop singer Lady Gaga. She lobbied him to combat bullying across America. It was a little like Red Riding Hood lobbying the Big Bad Wolf to promote vegetarianism.



Read more: President Obama -- The Bully In The White House | Fox News
 
Last edited:

14Wheeler

Seasoned Expediter
this is a non-story?


This is a huge "new" story.

Never before in history, do I ever remember the White House, putting pressure on Ford to yank any kind of commercial.
If indeed the story is factual, as written above, this is truly sad.
Ford indeed does have a point to remind all Americans. The fact they suck'd no monies off us should make their product more appealing. At least....it should. Personally, I've heard many many folks declare they'd never purchase a GM product ever again. I'd assume this is a widely held belief. If not, it should be.
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
I agree it's huge. I'm just asking Greg that since it's "old news" to him, does he think it's not worth reporting?
 

Poorboy

Expert Expediter
I know that I'll never buy any vehicle from the big 3 as long as it's built by the UAW! And if I should change my mind then it will be a Ford product just because they didn't take any tax payer money!
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Well.. of course there are examples, but putting it the context of Ford, the WH didn't "demand" that they pull the ad, it was truly in part of the rotation of the series.

As for examples, there are a lot of them, the WH under Bush, Clinton and Bush II all put pressure on companies like Proctor and Gamble, Warner-Lambert and other consumer product companies to pull ads that either were false, told some truth about some government policies and so on. I think it was 1989 under the Bush administration that P&G ran an ad in the NYC area about the EPA being overbearing on the issue of ingredients in hand soap so the WH told them to stop and the FTC stepped in and "asked" them to stop. There was one commercial with a company "attacking" Tyson in 1995 where the WH came to Tyson's defense with a lot of weight behind them through the Ag department - threating to shut down their operations unless they stop with the ads.

Many of you focus on Obama and this administration because they are this administration but don't get that a lot of things that happen, happen with all administrations with all kinds of freinds being helped out. The Ford case is a public opinion thing but the cause is taken up by the people who hate Obama, nothing more.

On top of all of that, many of you do not get the fact that Ford may not have taken the bailout money but they took every penny of the EPA and DoE grant/loan money they could get - how do you think They shored up their operations during the time GM was going through their bankruptcy?

SO let's see if the bully in the WH will also deal with Facebook, an organization that knowingly helping out terrorist recruiting here in the US.
 
Last edited:
Top