The issue is not that the kid made the shot, but that the rules were specific: the person whose NAME was on the ticket was the one called to take the shot. The kid whose name was called was outside. You can't substitute for someone. That the rep is even considering looking into whether the kid had a reasonable excuse for not being present (re: puking up nachos, etc) is more than fair.
""Pat Smith, had bought a raffle ticket"" so what is a raffle ticket .
last i knew you buy a ticket and you win if your ticket is pulled .
where did you see the rules at in that article
""Odds on Promotions, the insurance carrier for the event, had not yet indicated whether it would accept Nate making the shot in his brother's name.""
they are waiting to see how many people cry and for which side . and they are waiting to hear from their lawyer to see if they could be held legally for this if they say NO . to check the fine print
""Promotional prize insurance is insurance for a promotion where the participants are offered the chance to win prizes""
need to have insurance now for raffle tickets .
keep thinking inside the box