Terrorist Arrested in Southampton / Suffolk County..

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Wow !! This going to cost the city big time......:D And then after that, the ciivil lawsuit against all involved are going to start rolling...this women hit the jackpot..all because of LEO's on a power trip....


[h=1]Mother of 3 arrested, abused for taking pictures of tourist attraction at airport[/h]by Joel McDurmon on May 12, 2012
Mother of 3 arrested, abused for taking pictures of tourist attraction at airport | American Vision News

From the attorneys:

This case is a frightening example of what can happen when a photographer encounters ignorant bullies with badges. According to the complaint filed in Federal Court, Nancy Genovese, a mother of three, was driving home on County Road 31 past Gabreski Airport in Suffolk County. Gabreski Airport displays a decorative helicopter shell by the roadway to the public, which is visible to all who pass by.

Nancy Genovese stopped her car on the side of the road across the street from the airport in an area that is open and accessible to the public, and crossed over the road to the airport entryway that is also open and accessible to the public to take a picture of the helicopter display. While still in her car, she took a picture of the decorative helicopter shell with the intention of posting it on her personal “Support Our Troops” web page.

As Nancy Genovese was preparing to drive away, she was stopped and approached by Robert Iberger, a lieutenant with the Southampton Town Police. Lieutenant Iberger demanded to know why she was taking photographs. Nancy showed the lieutenant her camera, but Lieutenant Iberger grabbed her camera and handled it “without care”. In an attempt to prevent the lieutenant from damaging the camera, Nancy removed her memory card, which Lieutenant Iberger confiscated. To date, Nancy’s memory card still has not been returned to her.

Lieutenant Iberger demanded that Nancy remain where she is, and he refused to allow her to leave. At this time, Lieutenant Iberger notified the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office and the authorities at Gabreski Airport of Nancy’s presence outside the airport, and falsely and wrongfully informed them that she posed a terrorist threat.

Suffolk County Deputy Sheriff Robert Carlock responded to the scene, along with various members of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office. When Deputy Carlock arrived, he placed cameras on the roof of his vehicle, aimed at Nancy Genovese and her 18 and 20 year old sons who had come to the scene at this point to help their mother. Deputy Carlock ordered all three of them to stand directly in front of the cameras, and not to move.

Officials from the airport, as well as other local and federal law enforcement agencies also responded, including, without limitation, the Southampton Police Department, the Westhampton Police Department, the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security. Nancy was questioned on the side of the road for approximately five to six hours, from about 6pm until midnight, denied food or water, and denied the opportunity to use a restroom, all without having received any warnings as to her rights.

Nancy Genovese also had a left lower leg injury just above her ankle that she had received earlier in the day and which, exacerbated by the stress and length of her roadside detention, was causing her to limp. When the officers saw this, they ordered her to expose her wound, which was bleeding, for no legitimate purpose, and with no regard for Nancy’s health or well-being.

Members of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office used Nancy’s leg wound as another object to taunt her with, telling her that they were going to arrest her for an unreported knife wound.

Here’s where the story takes an interesting twist, and why I believe Nancy’s situation hasn’t received more press coverage. Before arriving at the airport to take a picture, earlier that day Nancy had been to the local shooting range with her rifle practicing her hobby, target shooting. During the first hour of questioning, Lieutenant Iberger searched Nancy’s vehicle, without her consent, and came across her unloaded rifle, which Nancy was legally carrying, in a locked case. Now some people throw up their arms (no pun intended) at this point, and say, “what does she want, she brought a rifle to the airport!”, but I would like to remind everyone that it is perfectly legal to drive around with an unloaded rifle in your car. Yes. Really. And Nancy did not enter the airport, she was parked alongside a public roadway. It is important to remember that no matter how you feel about firearms, nothing that Nancy did violated any laws.

Using force, Lieutenant Iberger pushed Nancy Genovese when she objected to the seizure of her rifle. Deputy Carlock taunted Nancy, asking in a disparaging tone, “You’re a real right winger, aren’t you?”, and stating in words or substance that she was never going to see her rifle again.

During the remainder of the six hours that Nancy Genovese was forcibly detained on the side of the road, she was taunted, verbally harangued, threatened, belittled, abused, humiliated and harassed by members of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office. For example, Deputy Carlock repeatedly referred to Nancy as “a right winger” and “tea bagger”, and threatened that they were going to arrest her for terrorism to make an example of her to other “tea baggers” and “right wingers”.

Around midnight, officials from the airport and federal law enforcement agencies determined that Nancy posed no terrorist or other security threat. Once most of the other law enforcement officials left the scene, Deputy Carlock ordered Nancy Genovese to be handcuffed by another member of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office. Before placed in handcuffs, Nancy attempted to give her purse containing her wallet and cell phone to her sons. Her wallet contained approximately $13,000 in cash, money she was holding to pay tuition that day for her son’s college and her daughter’s Catholic school tuition. Deputy Carlock refused to allow her sons to take her bag, and ordered her to leave it on the front seat of her unlocked vehicle, even after being informed of the value of its contents. When Nancy’s sons objected, Deputy Carlock threatened to arrest them if they touched it, and ordered them to leave the scene. Not knowing what to do, they left.

When Nancy’s sons responded to a call from the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office in the early morning hours to pick up their mother’s vehicle from the roadside, they found $5,300 of the $13,000 missing. The money was never returned. In addition, the contents of the glove compartment box was missing, and there was damage to the body of the car, particularly around the trunk.

Around midnight, after her sons were ordered to leave upon threat of arrest, Nancy was transported, in handcuffs, to the Suffolk County Jail. While in a holding cell, Deputy Carlock continued to verbally harass Nancy, telling her “you will pay”, and admitting that they had nothing to charge her with, but that he would “find something in order to teach all right wingers and tea baggers a lesson.”

While in her holding cell, Nancy Genovese was interrogated by Suffolk County Undersheriff Caracappa without receiving any warnings as to her rights. Her requests to speak to a lawyer were ignored. Following her “interrogation”, Undersheriff Caracappa informed her that she was being arrested and charged with “terrorism.”

At this point, Nancy requested medical treatment for her bleeding and painful left leg. After several requests, and several hours later, she was taken to the Peconic Bay Medical Center by male members of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office, and handcuffed to a bed. A sonogram was performed on Nancy’s left leg from her ankle to her inner groin, requiring her to disrobe. Despite her and the doctor’s request for them to turn away, the two male Suffolk Deputies insisted on staring at Nancy while she disrobed, further humiliating her. She was prescribed antibiotics, and discharged back to the Suffolk County Jail, with instructions on proper care for her leg wound.

Once back at the jail, the Suffolk County Sheriffs denied her access to her antibiotics, and denied her proper care of her leg wound. This caused a serious and painful staph infection to develop.

The following morning, Nancy Genovese was briefly questioned at the Suffolk County Jail by two FBI agents. No federal complaints or charges were ever brought against Nancy. That same day, Nancy was transported in handcuffs and ankle shackles, with no regard for her ankle wound, to the Southampton Justice Town Court. The driver drove fast and recklessly, intentionally making abrupt turns and laughing. This caused Nancy, who was not secured by a seatbelt, but was instead restrained with her hands cuffed behind her and her ankles cuffed together, to roll about in the back of the vehicle, further exacerbating her leg injury. When she requested that the Deputy Sheriffs secure her with a seatbelt, they laughed at her, and the driver continued to recklessly swerve the vehicle.

Nancy Genovese was brought into the courthouse in handcuffs and leg restraints, and was violently pushed through the door by the Deputy Sheriffs. This added to Nancy’s humiliation, particularly since Nancy knew some of the courthouse employees and other people who were present. Both before and after arriving at the courthouse, Nancy repeatedly requested to speak with an attorney. All of her requests were ignored.

Despite never stepping foot onto airport property, Nancy Genovese was arraigned on a single misdemeanor charge of Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree. She was assigned a Legal Aid Attorney by the Judge. Undersheriff Caracappa and Deputy Carlock intentionally lied to the Judge about the circumstances surrounding Nancy’s arrest, including that she was a terrorist and had surveillance equipment in her car, and the judge set bail in the amount of $50,000.

Due to the excessive amount of bail, Nancy’s children needed more time to come up with the money, so Nancy was returned to the jail. The Legal Aid Attorney assigned to Nancy spoke with the Deputy and Undersheriff, and due to the conversation, directly afterwards informed Nancy that he was no longer her attorney, and that he was going to ask the court to place her on suicide watch.

Once back at the jail, Nancy Genovese was processed, including being issued prison “greens” to wear, and was photographed, fingerprinted, and eye scanned. Members of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department continuously verbally harassed Nancy. A woman in civilian clothes then interviewed Nancy. The woman told Nancy she was going to be placed in “general population.” During the interview, two men wearing “Suffolk County Emergency Response Team” jackets entered the room. One of them removed Nancy from the room and held her in the hallway outside of the interview room. From there, Nancy heard the woman who had interviewed her arguing with the other man, saying that “She is not suicidal.”

Despite the woman’s protests, Nancy was physically moved by the two men wearing “Suffolk County Emergency Response Team” jackets to another room. There, another woman who identified herself as a nurse administered, without Nancy’s consent, two injections into Nancy’s arm. One of the men held Nancy’s head so that she could not see what was being done, while the other man held Nancy’s arm down. Despite her demands to know what they were doing, no one answered her. Nancy experienced bruising and swelling in her neck and arm long after she was released from custody.

Nancy was then escorted by the two men into a cell area, where she was forced to disrobe and put on a “suicide gown”, consisting of a heavy, jacket-type blanket that fastens around the body with Velcro. Nancy was not permitted to wear undergarments under the blanket. Nancy was required to wear this same “suicide gown” for the next several days. After three days, Nancy was evaluated by a psychiatrist who determined her to be of sound and stable mind, and immediately removed her from suicide watch.
Later that day, bail was posted, and Nancy was able to go home. Subsequently, all charges against Nancy were dismissed.

Upon Nancy’s release, Undersheriff Caracappa issued a press release in response to media inquiries, titled “Armed Woman Arrested for Trespassing at Suffolk County Gabreski Airport”, which falsely stated that Nancy had been taking pictures of the airport and surrounding security”, and that she became hysterical, and began “screaming and flailing around” when confronted. Undersheriff Caracappa also falsely reported that Nancy had surveillance equipment, 500 rounds of ammunition, and “scary weapons” in her car, and that she was a right-wing extremist and terrorist, and that she had been at the airport trespassing several times and had been warned to stay away. Upon further inquiry, it turns out that Nancy had never trespassed at the airport before, had never been warned by anyone to “stay away” before, had no “surveillance equipment” of any kind other than her point and shoot camera, and certainly was not a terrorist. Undersheriff Caracappa has refused to issue a retraction or correction.

Nancy has filed a Federal Lawsuit seeking up to 70 million dollars from the Town of Southampton, the County of Suffolk, Lieutenant Iberger, Undersheriff Caracappa, Deputy Carlock, Lieutenant Leuete, and various other employees of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department. The lawsuit is still ongoing.

Update:

Nancy Genovese Lawsuit Updates: Town of Southampton in Default

Nancy Genovese Lawsuit Updates: Town of Southampton in Default

The Town of Southampton has failed to timely file an answer to the Nancy Genovese lawsuit, (updates here), possibly leaving the taxpayers of the town on the hook for $70 million dollars. A motion for a default judgment has been filed against the Town of Southampton and Town of Southampton Police Officer Robert Iberger, and we are awaiting a decision by the court.
So what happened, and how could the town fail to defend itself against such a large lawsuit?
Michael C. Sordi, the Town Attorney for the Town of Southampton, represents both the town and defendant Robert Iberger, a Town of Southampton Police Officer. He is the attorney responsible for defending both the town and the Southampton Police, but as a result of personal issues, he inadvertently “forgot” to serve an answer. Sordi states in court documents that he telephoned counsel for the Plaintiff the day before his answer was due, advising that his mother was in extremis, and that the doctors treating her had suggested that her death was imminent. He was granted a verbal two week extension, but did not follow up in writing, as he was en route to his mother’s bedside.
A week later, the Town Attorney’s mother passed away. One week later, the Town Attorney’s 25 year old nephew died suddenly and unexpectedly. Michael Sordi states that over the course of these weeks he was in and out of his office tending to family business and grieving the loss of his family members, and that he quite frankly “forgot” that he had not served an answer in this case. He states “I simply got ‘caught up’ in my personal events and I thought, erroneously, that I had actually served the Answer, when in fact I had forgotten to upon my return to work.”
This has not been the first time that the Town Attorney has missed a deadline. Last year, he failed to timely file a response to a lawsuit against the town by a level 3 sex offender, putting the town at risk for an excessive judgment. Luckily, the delay in that case was positively resolved for the town.
Before Michael Sordi was appointed as the Town Attorney for the Town of Southampton, he was the lead attorney in Nassau County in a high profile federal case involving excessive force by a Nassau County police officer. The county lost the case, and the jury awarded the plaintiff nearly $20 million dollars. Michael Sordi was fired by Nassau County shortly thereafter in December 2009. Republican County Attorney John Ciampoli clamed Mr. Sordi, as the lead council on the case, did not complete any prepatory work for several pretrial motions that needed to be filed. He stated “I would characterize that case as having been grossly mismanaged and mishandled by my predecessors in virtually every way that I could imagine.”
Although town officials were aware of the Nassau County mess, they hired Mr. Sordi anyway. Last Friday, Michael C. Sordi, the Town Attorney for the Town of Southampton, was asked to submit his resignation. As part of his parting package, he will receive one month’s salary (his annual salary was $115,000), compensation for unused vacation and sick days, and the town will pay for his health insurance coverage through May 2011. Mr. Sordi also had the town sign an agreement that the town will “fully, forever, irrevocably and unconditionally” release him from any liability in claims or lawsuits brought against the town.
No word yet on if the taxpayers of the Town of Southampton will be on the hook for the $70 million dollar default judgment.

WATCH THIS VIDEO:

Nancy Genovese wins default $70 Million Judgment Against Southampton Town Council - YouTube
 

paullud

Veteran Expediter
Why would you ever hire a lawyer who does not do his job? The town deserves whatever happens to it for putting the wrong people in control.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
Why would you ever hire a lawyer who does not do his job? The town deserves whatever happens to it for putting the wrong people in control.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums

Apparently, the judge let the case go on. I mean, you can't hold a town accountable just because one of their employees ignored the law... in this case, twice.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Why would you ever hire a lawyer who does not do his job? The town deserves whatever happens to it for putting the wrong people in control.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums

The Female Board Supervisor was dancin as she was tryin to cover her backside.. at one point it sounded like she had tried to say it was just a "frivialous lawsuit" the week before in their meeting..but the male member who was also a lawyer was hot and he was having nothing to do with that, he was calling her out.. he seen the hand writing on the wall.....
 

zorry

Veteran Expediter
Wait. Parked on the side of the road,near an airport( which may be a secure area)camera,rifle,leg wound,$13,000.00 cash. Sounds like a modern day episode of I Love Lucy. If some book in Vegas would post it I would put my money on Frivilous Lawsuit .
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
Wait. Parked on the side of the road,near an airport( which may be a secure area)camera,rifle,leg wound,$13,000.00 cash. Sounds like a modern day episode of I Love Lucy. If some book in Vegas would post it I would put my money on Frivilous Lawsuit .

Obviously it wasn't a secure area, because even the FBI said no harm, no foul. There was a helicopter there, for tourists to take pictures of. She was pulled over by a busy-body cop. "Are you one of those right-wingers?" Damm straight, LIBTARD NAZI! I was SEETHING reading this! Who the F do these people think they are? Don't they weed out the psychos in police academy? Is anyone paying attention there? They are a threat to the public!

Regardless of what you may think... the money, the rifle, the camera... everything was legal. She did nothing wrong! The things they did to her were demeaning, humiliating, inhuman... all because she chose to practice her rights. They need to go to jail. End of story.
 

zorry

Veteran Expediter
My point is we're basing our judgements based on her side of the story.
My bet is the otherside will be quit different.
And the truth again quite different.
Wait again. Let me get my glasses and coffee.
CRAP ! What am I doing in the Soapbox ?
I don't even read the Soapbox !
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
My point is we're basing our judgements based on her side of the story.
My bet is the otherside will be quit different. And the truth again quite different.
Quite possibly.

This incident happened in July of 2009.

Genovese had been seen at the air field taking pictures on several previous occasions over the previous few weeks and was warned to stay away. On one of those prior occasions, "She had wandered on the property, looking around, and was approached by staff at the Air National Guard," Undersheriff Caracappa said. "She was asking them about containers on the property, and they said, 'We can't tell you that,' and asked her to leave. Two days later she was discovered by National Guard staff wandering around the containers and taking pictures, and was escorted off the base."

Oh, yeah, almost for got, the Suffolk County Francic S. Gabreski Airport in Westhampton got it's name from WWII and Korean War Flying Ace Colonel Francis S Gabreski, who was the commander of the 52nd Fighter-Interceptor Wing stationed at Suffolk Country Air Force Base, which was later renamed to Suffolk County Air National Guard Base, and then when it was converted to a joint civil-military airport it was renamed in honor of the Colonel. Officially, it has two names, depending on what part of the airport you will be using: the United States Air Force Gabreski Airport (ANG), with a large section of it being called the Suffolk County Francis S. Gabreski Airport. The Air Force and NY Air National Guard operates the 106th Air Rescue Wing at Gabriski, and is also an Air Combat Command (ACC), one of only ten Major Commands (MAJCOM) that report to Headquarters, USAF (HAF) at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia. The base utilizes C-130 Hercules aircraft and MH-60G Black Hawk helicopters.

So, on more than one occasion, she was told to stop taking pictures of the airport, and to not come back. After her initial visits, airport security (local and military) did a background check on her, including her Twitter feed and MySpace pages (which was made "private" by her right around the time of the "decorative helicopter" photographing incident, but archived here). That's probably where the police got the information about her and "repeatedly referred to Nancy as “a right winger” and “tea bagger”," but she, along with her sons, have also had more than one run-in with the local police at her home over various things. She's (or was, at least) a huge Glenn Beck fan, paranoid of census takers, and, the best part... convinced that FEMA has a camp at Gabriski Airport.

I don't recommend wasting a lot of time reading her MySpace archive, but the more you read, the frothier she appears.

It's hard to get at exactly what happened, really, because it's an older story and the reporters of the original news reports used a combination of opinion passed off as fact, and the baby-bird technique of news gathering, where they simply took whatever they were fed as being good to eat.

So, she's been warned on multiple occasions to stay away from the Air National Guard Base and to stop taking pictures, and she's back again, only this time she's got an open, bleeding leg wound, $13,000 in cash, a shotgun, an XM-15 assault rifle, 250 shotgun shells and more than 250 rounds of rifle ammunition, and she's taking pictures of the perimeter of the, you know, Air Force Base... because she's convinced, thanks to Glenn Beck and the Internet wackos getting her all frothy, there be FEMA camps there. Individually these things don't add up to much, unless you add them up.

Innocent? Maybe. Pure as the driven snow? Probably not. Context? Important.

1955882628.jpg
 

OldGuy

Active Expediter
And reasons like this are why I carry.
Go ahead and try to deny my rights as an American and you'll be on the wrong end of a very persuasive argument.
 

xiggi

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
If all the people that talk smack about packing and being denied rights actually acted out guns would be erupting all over the place. My new pre paid therapy business model should be a huge hit.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using EO Forums
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Sign me up, Xiggi. The way people employ the 'baby bird technique' to form opinions drives me crazy.
The article leaves a lot of questions unanswered, like how her sons arrived [who told them, if her phone was confiscated?] and why she was carrying that much cash [the 'tuition' story is flimsy - how many institutions would accept that kind of cash?] and especially why she returned to a place she'd been warned away from already - which they didn't mention at all.
Getting bent out of shape over sensational 'news' stories without looking any further is being a marionette, with someone pulling the strings. Use the scissors - look further than just one story, and the truth may be something quite different.
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
I was never convinced she was pure as snow. So, she was told not to come around there anymore. Was it public or private property? Was trespassing one of the charges? I didn't read that. I read "terrorism". Now is that Webster's definition of terrorism, or is it the government's definition of terrorism, which entails anyone who speaks out against the government?

Listened to Glen Beck? Are you kidding? Is that a prelude to "gonna blow something up"? Makes me wonder what's in those containers, tho. Oooh... secret, secret, I've got a secret.

BTW... I don't like that they can hold you for three days, then decide they won't charge you for anything. Yes, it has some legitimate uses, but more and more I'm hearing that it's used as intimidation. And what's the deal with not letting her see a lawyer? Being questioned after her arrest, and not read Miranda? She may be a crackpot, or maybe she isn't. But those are gestapo tactics.

I hope she wins. The cities who turn these rogues loose need a wakeup call!
 
Last edited:

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
I was never convinced she was pure as snow. So, she was told not to come around there anymore. Was it public or private property?
Private property, both the airport itself, and the AFB proper.

Was trespassing one of the charges? I didn't read that. I read "terrorism".
Class 3 Criminal Trespass was the only charge she was charged with, actually.

Listened to Glen Beck? Are you kidding? Is that a prelude to "gonna blow something up"? Makes me wonder what's in those containers, tho. Oooh... secret, secret, I've got a secret.
Listening to Glenn Beck is not a very likely prelude to blowing something up, despite him being a repeated advocate of that very thing.

BTW... I don't like that they can hold you for three days, then decide they won't charge you for anything. Yes, it has some legitimate uses, but more and more I'm hearing that it's used as intimidation. And what's the deal with not letting her see a lawyer? Being questioned after her arrest, and not read Miranda? She may be a crackpot, or maybe she isn't. But those are gestapo tactics.
Keep in mind that the only person who said she was denied counsel is, well, her counsel. She's never said as much. Same with not being read her Miranda rights. However, since she's apparently very quick to let everyone who talks to her know that she knows her rights, it's quite possible that someone began reading Miranda Rights and she stopped them before they finished. Also something to consider is someone who knows their rights as well as this woman proclaims, and then allows themselves to be interrogated without counsel for even three minutes seems a tab bit incongruous considering that she's probably at least somewhat aware of her right to remain silent.

I think her attorney has massaged facts and circumstances to favor his client. For example, he stated that earlier in the day she sustained a leg injury. That's the one that was fresh, open and bleeding. He did not elaborate as to exactly when, where or how the injury occurred. I have to wonder if "earlier in the day" didn't mean 20 minutes earlier when she gashed it open while trying to negotiate the top of a barbed wire fence along the perimeter of the airport. <snort>

I hope she wins. The cities who turn these rogues loose need a wakeup call!
That's quite a conclusion based solely on the account of her attorney. The attorney's account is sooo one sided that one (me, at least) can't help but to question it. According to his account, several police departments, the Air National Guard and the Air Force, along with the FBI and Homeland Security are all in on this to abuse this pure innocent woman for no apparent reason other than they are a part of the big, bad government and that's pretty much their bread and butter.
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
Read again. The FBI and ANG washed their hands of this "terrorist". But you are right on one thing, there is only one side to this. I just find it comical that, in the end, the city lawyer dropped the ball, and the judge was forced to ponder if the city should have more time or not. That was wishful thinking on my part, that the woman would get a default judgement. However, I knew the judge just couldn't allow that, now could he?

Comical, to say the least.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Hilarious. I do believe that if the situation was reversed, the judge would issue a default judgement on behalf of the city in a heartbeat. I think the same thing should apply here.
 
Top