Tea Party group wants Palin for RNC

witness23

Veteran Expediter
As Greg and I were talking about in another thread, this job would fit her to a "T"! It is a job that is behind the seens, a job for someone who can raise money(which she is great at), a job that requires someone who is able to rally their base, and a job where they need a true Conservitive in place. And she turns it down? In my opinion she has no intention of taking any position in our Federal Govt. which screams of hypocrosy in my opinion. Turning down this job offer just may be her demise.

Link: Tea party group wants Palin for RNC - Andy Barr - POLITICO.com

By ANDY BARR | 12/6/10 11:25 AM EST Updated: 12/6/10 11:41 PM EST

Tea Party Nation founder Judson Phillips sent a letter to former Alaska GOP Gov. Sarah Palin asking her to run for chairwoman of the Republican National Committee.

"In order for the tea party, conservative movement to be successful, we have to have someone conservative running the GOP," Phillips told POLITICO. "She is the perfect candidate. If she does not try, I am afraid we will end up with just another establishment flunky running the party and the [Republicans in name] will control the party again."

"She has a track record of cutting wasteful spending, which has occurred under the watch of Michael Steele," he added. "Finally, she is simply a rock star. She can raise money like no one else out there that I can think of."

In his letter to Palin, Phillips pleaded, “We need you as [chairwoman] of the RNC. You have shown in the past no hesitation to take on the establishment. ... If we end up with establishment control of the GOP and their support for an establishment candidate in 2012, Obama and the socialists will have won."

Palin, however, declined Phillips's proposal in a statement released on Monday.

"I respect the desire to have someone in charge of the RNC who understands the wishes of the conservative grassroots and understands that power rests with the people and not the vested interests in D.C.," Palin said. "However, the primary role of the RNC chair seems to be that of fundraiser-in-chief, and there are others who would probably be much more comfortable asking people for money than I would be, and they would definitely enjoy it more."

Tea Party Nation, the second-tier national tea party group, has been plagued by reported financial troubles of its own, but under Phillips' leadership it has demonstrated an ability to maintain an outsized national political impact. Palin delivered the keynote speech at the group's first National Tea Party Convention in February, which was broadcast live on by Fox News.

Roughly a half of a dozen candidates are vying to replace RNC Chairman Michael Steele, who has yet to announce whether he will run for reelection.

The RNC race is the ultimate insider's game, with 85 votes from the 168 committee members needed to win. The current candidates from outside the national committee have struggled to gain traction. And some of the race's potential big name candidates -– including former Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.) and former Oklahoma GOP Gov. Frank Keating -– have taken a pass.

In his letter, Phillips focused on much of the same criticism the current candidates have lobbed at Steele, contending that RNC fundraising problems prevented the committee from maximizing GOP gains in the 2010 midterms.

“Something is really wrong with the GOP when the RNC cannot fund a get out the vote campaign for midterm elections,” Phillips writes.

Steele and his allies have vigorously challenged critics, but criticism of the committee's behind the scenes organizational work in the 2010 cycle is widespread -- and what most of the RNC candidates seeking to replace Steele are pledging to reinvigorate.

A spokesman for the former Alaska governor did not respond to a request for comment, but a Palin RNC run seems improbable.

Palin has been an ardent Steele defender during some of the most trying times of his chairmanship. She even lent her high profile to a pair of RNC fundraising events in October in California and Florida.

Palin is also weighing a potential presidential run during the same cycle that Phillips would like her to serve as chairwoman of the party. Accepting such a post would effectively end her campaign before it starts.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
She would be perfect for the job. I MIGHT understand why she would turn it down. MAYBE because she would think that she would be more "controlled" by an "established" party. I don't know.

I don't understand what you mean about not taking a job with the Federal Government. The RNC is NOT part of the Federal Government and NOT paid by tax dollars. As far as I know she has not been offered Federal Employment to date, though I very well could be wrong on that one.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
She'll turn it down and here is why - she is like everyone else who enters politics, they get to thinking that this is nice and want more.

I was listening to some author about the early days of our nation and he pointed out that there has been no one since Washington outside of a few senators and congressmen who have stepped away from politics or have stuck to a plan. Jefferson, Adams (especially him) and others of the founding fathers didn't do the Washington bit but came about to realize that power and money are good things to have.

The sad thing is that we should be looking for those few who are determined to do something and move on. We should ever have a person like Dingle or Conyers who have been in officer more than two terms.

THIS brings up the problem with the tea party and the crap of the '94 contract with America nostalgia, the issue of term limits is hardly mentioned and this will be the one thing that will make the tea party and those like Palin just another politician because they don't talk about it.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Term limits will NEVER pass. Why? Those passing it would have to give up power and control. It is the responsibility of the people to IMPOSE term limits at the ballot box. WE have the power. WE, as a People have given away that power. WE either take it back, and soon, or we will lose it forever and just be another controlled group of subjects. Just like Europe.
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
She would be perfect for the job. I MIGHT understand why she would turn it down. MAYBE because she would think that she would be more "controlled" by an "established" party. I don't know.

I don't understand what you mean about not taking a job with the Federal Government. The RNC is NOT part of the Federal Government and NOT paid by tax dollars.

I should've stated that she will not take any position that has anything to do with the Government or being a face of any party. She will not be a spokeswoman for any party, she will not be held responsible for any actions or words she says. She will be someone who just says idiotic statements on Twitter.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I should've stated that she will not take any position that has anything to do with the Government or being a face of any party. She will not be a spokeswoman for any party, she will not be held responsible for any actions or words she says. She will be someone who just says idiotic statements on Twitter.


Why do you care? She will not be elected or most likely not even run. She holds NO power or control over you. She is almost irrelevent.

Worry about those in power now, like Obama, who are trashing our Constitution. Worry about the lack of honest, quality candidates. Worry about a totally biased press that will NOT do the job that they should be doing. THOSE are the REAL problems. Palin is a distraction, which is WHY she gets SO much attention. Shine the light on her and the rest of the "roaches" can scurry about in the dark, and are able to continue spreading the diseases that they spread without attention.
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
Why do you care?

Why do you care that I care? Because your panties are in bunch about whatever it might be. Just back off until you cool off about whatever has you in a tizzie

She will not be elected or most likely not even run. She holds NO power or control over you. She is almost irrelevent.

We share the opinion of her not running, but that is all it is, an opinion. I nor you have no idea what is going on in that little head of hers. I am sure there are quite a few here in the Soapbox that would vote for this woman if she does run and you have no idea if she would be elected or not.

The story and discussion is relevant, regardless of what you think. Relevant in the fact that Greg and I were having a discussion about her in another thread.

Worry about those in power now, like Obama, who are trashing our Constitution.

Coming from a man who shares the same voting philosophy of W.C. Fields. The American people put him in power and they have the choice in 2 years to either re-elect or do away with him.

Worry about the lack of honest, quality candidates.

Another reason why I started thread and the reason why she came up previously in another thread. This is the best the GOP has to offer?

Worry about a totally biased press that will NOT do the job that they should be doing.

Oh my God, the media is biased? I had no idea.

Palin is a distraction

We both agree on that one.
 

dieseldiva

Veteran Expediter
I should've stated that she will not take any position that has anything to do with the Government or being a face of any party. She will not be a spokeswoman for any party, she will not be held responsible for any actions or words she says. She will be someone who just says idiotic statements on Twitter.

That's a ridiculous statement, even coming from you. Looks like more than one conservative lives rent free in your head! :rolleyes:

And you're saying this to someone else??....................
Just back off until you cool off about whatever has you in a tizzie

WTH....
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Hey, I don't were panties, therefor they cannot be in a "bunch" and I have NO idea in the world what a "twizzie" is.

Good rant though and FUN!! Too bad I have to work now. I would LOVE to have the time to RANT BACK BETTER!! :p
 

dieseldiva

Veteran Expediter
What's so ridiculous about it?

This should be good

Maybe we should start at the beginning and you can explain how she ISN'T doing any of these things??

I should've stated that she will not take any position that has anything to do with the Government or being a face of any party. She will not be a spokeswoman for any party, she will not be held responsible for any actions or words she says. She will be someone who just says idiotic statements on Twitter.

She doesn't take a position and stand on it??

She isn't a spokeswoman for the conservative segment of the republican party??

She isn't held responsible for ANY of her actions or words?? SERIOUSLY?? She's been vetted far more than any candidate in history, including Obama and you say she isn't held responsible for her actions or words??
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Hey Witness, I don't were "kickers" either so they can't be in a "twist"!! That one is for EnglishLady!!!! LOL!!! :p
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
Hey Witness, I don't were "kickers" either so they can't be in a "twist"!! That one is for EnglishLady!!!! LOL!!! :p

Actually, you are one up on me. I think you meant to say wear instead of were. It sounds like you were in a hurry, so we'll look the other way on that one.
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
I have NO idea in the world what a "twizzie" is.

It is actually "tizzy". Sorry for the spelling mistake. In fairness, I think that might be the first time I have either typed or wrote the word "tizzy" in my lifetime.

Tizzy: State of anxiety
A nervous, excited or confused state.
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
That's a ridiculous statement, even coming from you. Looks like more than one conservative lives rent free in your head! :rolleyes

Wow....you are insufferable.

Enough with the "rent free in your head" thing. I could say the same thing about you and just about everyone else here in the Soapbox about Obama or the "lamestream media", "living rent free in your head".

There was an attempt at a conversation here until you chimed in.

Let me ask you this. Should she(Palin) have taken the RNC job offer, in your opinion? Or, would you rather see her run for the Presidency?

I give the woman kudos for what I feel would make her a good RNC Chairman and that's still not good enough for you. Again, that is my point of view of Palin, what is your's?


And you're saying this to someone else??....................

WTH....

You have no dog in that fight, so butt out. Insufferable I tell you.
 

dieseldiva

Veteran Expediter
Wow....you are insufferable.

Enough with the "rent free in your head" thing. I could say the same thing about you and just about everyone else here in the Soapbox about Obama or the "lamestream media", "living rent free in your head".

There was an attempt at a conversation here until you chimed in.

That chiming in thing may be an inconvenience for you but if you can't handle it, take your conversations to pm's.


Let me ask you this. Should she(Palin) have taken the RNC job offer, in your opinion? Or, would you rather see her run for the Presidency?

Actually, I agree that at this point in time, the RNC chairmanship is the perfect fit for her. Raising money is what she's able to do best right now. I don't want her to run for the presidency, maybe someday but not right now....however.....if it would come down to being between her and Obama, of course I would vote for her.

I give the woman kudos for what I feel would make her a good RNC Chairman and that's still not good enough for you.

It wasn't your kudos to her that I commented on.....was it? :p

Again, that is my point of view of Palin, what is your's?


You have no dog in that fight, so butt out. Insufferable I tell you.

Again, there is no "butting" in on conversations on a public forum, if you want privacy or there are some opinions you simply cannot "suffer" through, you need to take your conversations to pm's or emails.
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
Again, there is no "butting" in on conversations on a public forum.

Your very first post to this thread was you calling me "ridiculous" and making the childish comment of living rent free. You offered nothing to the conversation, which at this point I should come to expect. You totally made the thead about me and not the article posted.

Then you proceeded to comment on something that had nothing to do with you, with the "WTH" comment. Again, you made the post about your opinion of me and offered nothing to the conversation.

if you want privacy or there are some opinions you simply cannot "suffer" through, you need to take your conversations to pm's or emails.

I can suffer through just about anything, it's the unbearable part that bothers me.

I do believe I am, "Living rent free in your head."
 
Top