Tea party cry ironic given history of ancestors

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Elizabeth Cook-Lynn rapidcityjournal.com | Posted: Saturday, August 28, 2010 6:00 am

The national crusade of "Take Back America" by tea party activists and the Arizona Legislature is as bigoted as it is absurd. It will catch on in states like Missouri, South Carolina, and the Dakotas.

The crusade is about "illegal immigrants" and the theory of white European immigration as the settlers know it.

It's also about the hostility of a nation that prides itself on being a nation of immigrants, while ironically putting up fences to keep neighbors from Mexico out. It's a little like the gated communities so popular in the cities of our country.

The theory is that anyone coming here since 1900 is not eligible. When White Europeans made up the census of newcomers, when Africans were considered barely surviving slave populations, and indigenous peoples were thought to be inferior and vanishing, it was a world, then, the settlers said, for the "taking".

Today, it is about the need of America to see itself as an all-white majority regime. It is about losing the white-only power maintained for 200 years.

It's about a black president in a white-power country. Tea partiers expect Barack Obama to "show his papers" (birth certificate) in public over and over again because he is a black man who they believe has no right to the presidency.

It is about segregating Indians in 1880, and African slaves in 1860, and "taking" whatever white power has wanted.

Today, it is about despising the notion that America might like to envision itself in the coming centuries as a socialist democracy with real equality for everyone, rather than equality for a few in a continuing thuggish, capitalistic democracy.

Most of all, it is about race and skin color.

Sadly, the tea party gives us the narrative of the offspring of the early immigrants who are coming to the sad conclusion that they can no longer "take" the land and the resources as their forebears did. But their belief that they are entitled to do so is a strong belief in the idea that any worthwhile history in this country is their history.

To "take back America," the cry of the tea bag party, means what it has always meant to early settlers: that they have the right to take America.

This entitlement has always given meaning to settlers in this new land: early Europeans and their offspring who settled on the east coast in the 1700s and 1800s are "real" Americans. The English, German, Scandinavian settlers and the Irish, Bosnians, French, Bohemians and Scottish are the "real" Americans who forged westward.

If there is one thing that the natives who met them at the boat knew, it was how to live in this land without destroying it. They did that for thousands of years, yet the European immigrant has never gotten it.

Their theft and occupation of native lands has, unfortunately, threatened the continent in ways native peoples had never imagined: dust bowls, thousands of nuclear bombs at the ready, decades of war, republicanism, raging and aggressive capitalism, oceans smeared with oil and set afire, and on and on. There is no room for the Indian people who have occupied this continent for centuries.

Make no mistake, this cry of "take our country back" by the tea partiers is about race, skin color and discrimination.

Since no one can credibly claim that the Mayans Aztecs, Yakima, Sioux and the Hopi are illegal immigrants, it is about erasing their histories and substituting them with a new cry from the all non-white settlers of the country: "Show me your papers".

This never works on the long term in a country, nor did it work in Nazi Germany decades ago. It didn't even work when Red Cloud signed a treaty in 1868 at Fort Laramie that said white men had to show their "papers" to get permission to enter the Great Sioux Lands of the West.

Instead of "showing their papers" the U.S. Army was called out to invade the borderlands. Custer did not "show his papers", nor did anyone in his 7th cavalry.

The treaty borders were overrun by "illegal immigrants" and Custer's parade of European militants. Apparently, Custer has won the war in the minds of American settlers everywhere, thus, "taking" America and "taking back" America are synonymous historically.

Like Custer, the tea partiers will take what they can.
 

dieseldiva

Veteran Expediter
It's good :rolleyes: to see that the Sioux tribe is just as diverse as the rest of the country. Racism is alive and well. Hello pot, meet kettle.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Dumb story. The "Indians" took the land from someone else. White man and yellow/red man, where ever he came from, has been fighting over North America since at least 960AD. There are some really good studies being done at the University of Michigan on the not so nice interactions between Vikings and Japanese "indians" in the area we call Greenland in that time frame. They could not get along between themselves either. Old garbage.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
How do they come up with this stuff? She must come from the Michael Moore School of Journalism.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
native Indians claim to be direct descendants of the first to cross the Bering straits...they separated and went their different ways....some south to become Hopi and some east to make Ojibway/Huron...from there they formed a diverse peoples....developing in different cultures....

Remains dug up at different finds of the 17th/18th century American Native closely resemble the ones found dating back to BC....
 

dieseldiva

Veteran Expediter
I think you can go down through the ages and see that ALL tribes, races, etc. have wronged someone else somewhere along the way. One can choose to either dwell there (in the past) and use it to justify their hatred of others or you can choose to move forward and try to make things better. Sadly, it appears that this author chooses the former.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
I think you can go down through the ages and see that ALL tribes, races, etc. have wronged someone else somewhere along the way. One can choose to either dwell there (in the past) and use it to justify their hatred of others or you can choose to move forward and try to make things better. Sadly, it appears that this author chooses the former.

Yep..the author seems to dwell in the past...

but then again...they say history repeats itself.....we the Whites may find ourselves tossed out....
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
native Indians claim to be direct descendants of the first to cross the Bering straits...they separated and went their different ways....some south to become Hopi and some east to make Ojibway/Huron...from there they formed a diverse peoples....developing in different cultures....

Remains dug up at different finds of the 17th/18th century American Native closely resemble the ones found dating back to BC....

SOME of the Indians came across the Bering straights, not all. They have been doing DNA testing on remains found in Greenland. Mixed in with Viking remains. The DNA is NOT the same as other natives. These remains are from Japan. It seems that they might have displaced the Vikings there. There is even some evidence beginning to be studied that suggest that European neadrathals preceeded the viking to North America.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
really don't matter whether our descendants came from the east or the west...they all originated from the European/Asian continent..
our number is up...another species will rule....Obama-nites...:p
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
really don't matter whether our descendants came from the east or the west...they all originated from the European/Asian continent..
our number is up...another species will rule....Obama-nites...:p


NO, we all came from Africa, except Obama, he came from outer space somewhere!!

YOU might be ruled by the Obama-nites, I won't be. They may kill me but they will NEVER rule me. So there. :p
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Racism is alive and well. Hello pot, meet kettle.

Diva, no kidding where is the racism?

I heard this today, sitting there in my car listening to Jackson claim how much racism there is in America and I had to ask the black guy sitting next to me where it was. He couldn't figure out where to find it or what to do if he did.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
You don't think the author has a problem with "whitey"?? You don't think there's still racism in this country? Do you believe in "reverse racism"??

oh there is racism everywhere if you want to really see it...

I talk with drivers and they don't like the blacks and think they should still be swinging from the banana trees...

and east indians...same thing except they should all be with the rice burners...
 

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
oh there is racism everywhere if you want to really see it...

I talk with drivers and they don't like the blacks and think they should still be swinging from the banana trees...

and east indians...same thing except they should all be with the rice burners...

And don't forget about the Jews owning all the banks. :rolleyes:
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Actually I think there is more of an issue with the author not having a grip on reality more than anything else. Maybe she has a serious identity crisis?

As for true racism, where in the H*ll is it?

I am not talking about bigotry or cultural differences but actual racism where they are actually discriminating against people because of their race, where is it?

Beck has made an interesting point, he seems to think that we need to revisit the era of civil rights because his seem to be disappearing, maybe he's racist?

I don't know. Listing to the swill from Jackson today, I seem to be on the side of GTFU.
 
Top