Pot smoking mother drives off with baby on car roof - Yahoo! News Legalize weed , really? u decide.
It's okay to put a baby on a car roof, heck Mitt Romney had his dog up there for a whole vacation.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using EO Forums
Barrak ate his dog.
Strange idea, there just may be a HUGE difference between a baby and a dog. Babies are HUMAN BEINGS, dogs are not. There is no comparison.
I don't think that's ever happened before."It appears the suspect put the baby on the roof of the car and drove off, forgetting he was still on the roof," Holmes said in a written statement.
That baby is in the hands of The State. I can't think of anything more scary than that.All I can say is that the baby is in safer hands now!
That baby is in the hands of The State. I can't think of anything more scary than that.
In the hands of its drunken. drugged up mother !!
Yes, exactly, it's mother. Mothers have been known to make mistakes with their children. But the bottom line is it's the mother's child to raise as she pleases, mistakes and all. It's nobody else's business. Golden Rule. If you're OK with taking away someone else's liberty and freedom simply on the basis that you want to do it, then you must be OK with others taking away your rights and liberties simply because they want to. If children got taken away from their parents every time their parents got drunk and made an impaired decision, few children would be with their parents.In the hands of its drunken. drugged up mother !!
Yes, exactly, it's mother. Mothers have been known to make mistakes with their children. But the bottom line is it's the mother's child to raise as she pleases, mistakes and all. It's nobody else's business. Golden Rule. If you're OK with taking away someone else's liberty and freedom simply on the basis that you want to do it, then you must be OK with others taking away your rights and liberties simply because they want to. If children got taken away from their parents every time their parents got drunk and made an impaired decision, few children would be with their parents.
IMO .... the mother gave up her rights as soon as she drove off with her baby on top of the car!
Negligence and endangering the life of her child is hardly her right to raise her (or anyone's) chid as she pleases now is it.
IMO .... the mother gave up her rights as soon as she drove off with her baby on top of the car!
Negligence and endangering the life of her child is hardly her right to raise her (or anyone's) chid as she pleases now is it.
There have been more then a few storys of parents doing this exact thing and they were stone cold sboer and not on drugs not impaired in anyway...they sat the child in the car carrier on the roof to unlock the car..had alot on their mind, reached to put soething that was in the hand in the car, got in and drove off...
They should have their child taken away as in this case by the worthless state run child protection services to ignore and hand over to someone who collect kids like the check each month???
Nope, sorry....
Yes it is her child to raise as she pleases. It is, afterall, HER child. She can teach her child one particular religion, or no religion at all. She can teach the child to swim, or to be deathly afraid of the water. She can be a helicopter parent, or leave the child alone. She can do whatever she wants, it's HER child. It's HER business. Not anyone else's.Negligence and endangering the life of her child is hardly her right to raise her (or anyone's) chid as she pleases now is it.
Yes it is her child to raise as she pleases. It is, afterall, HER child. She can teach her child one particular religion, or no religion at all. She can teach the child to swim, or to be deathly afraid of the water. She can be a helicopter parent, or leave the child alone. She can do whatever she wants, it's HER child. It's HER business. Not anyone else's.
And before you ask, the answer will be YES to any ridiculous, absurd, or extreme "Well, what about....?" questions. It's her child, her business.