Republicans flirt with breif default

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Republican mainstream flirts with brief default
Tim Reid and Steven C. Johnson Tim Reid And Steven C. Johnson
WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) – An idea once confined to the fringe of the Republican party is seeping into its mainstream -- that a brief default might be an acceptable price to pay if it forces the White House to deal with runaway spending.

An increasing number of Republicans do not believe the Obama administration's dire predictions of economic "catastrophe" if the debt limit is not increased. They argue a period of technical default can be managed without plunging markets into chaos.

Establishment Republicans including Tim Pawlenty, the former Minnesota governor who announced his presidential candidacy last month, are backing a short-term default if it leads to deep, immediate spending cuts.

Jeff Sessions and Paul Ryan, the top Republicans on the Senate and House Budget Committees, have also said failure to raise the debt limit would not trigger immediate catastrophe.

Republican Senator Pat Toomey has even introduced legislation directing the Treasury to prioritize debt service over other payments if the debt limit is not raised. It has 22 Republican co-sponsors in the Senate and 98 in the House of Representatives, although no members of the Republican leadership have backed it.

David Frum, a former speechwriter for President George W. Bush and a Republican advocate for raising the debt limit, said he holds regular question-and-answer sessions with Republican congressman over a beer.

"I have yet to meet one Republican who actually says a failure to raise the debt limit scares them," Frum said. "It is deeply, deeply troubling the number of Republicans I now talk to -- and I include the mainstream -- who think a technical default is manageable.

Many on Wall Street disagree. They fear even the briefest default would cause a steep climb in interest rates worldwide and a tumbling dollar, which would tip a fragile economy back into recession and cause financial market upheaval on a scale not seen since the collapse of Lehman Bros.

Fueling skepticism over this outcome is an argument made last month by legendary investor Stan Druckenmiller, a one-time ally of George Soros, who said he would favor a short-term default if in exchange lawmakers in Washington struck a deal for massive spending cuts and a medium-term plan to tackle the $1.4 trillion deficit.

"That had a lot of impact on Republicans," said Vin Weber, a veteran Republican strategist and party moderate. He said the idea that a short-term default would not be a problem "is definitely becoming a mainstream belief."

HARDBALL APPROACH

While Druckenmiller's hardball approach may resonate with Republicans in Washington, it has few fans on Wall Street.

Ratings agency Moody's warned on June 2 it would consider cutting the United States' top-notch credit rating if it did not see by mid July substantial progress toward an agreement between the White House and Congress to increase America's $14.3 trillion borrowing limit.

Moody's lead credit analyst for the United States, Steven Hess, said on Tuesday the agency would not immediately downgrade Washington's Triple-A credit if it missed the August 2 deadline. It would wait to see if interest payments were made.

Bond investors say even a temporary default could erode confidence in Treasuries and the dollar, wreak havoc in mutual funds and possibly provoke another global crisis.

"It's a very dangerous tactic," said Mirko Mikelic, who helps manage $17 billion at Fifth Third Asset Management. "I think you would see investors move away from the United States and move to other markets as they lose confidence in the financial system and our ability to keep our house in order."

Many Republicans doubt the August 2 deadline. They argue that if the borrowing cap is not raised by then, the Treasury will have sufficient revenues to service the nation's interest payments and, for a period of time, pay obligations such as Social Security and Medicare.

More mainstream skepticism could hamper efforts by Vice-President Joe Biden to hammer out a deal on raising the borrowing cap with a bipartisan group of lawmakers, which meets for a sixth time on Thursday.

The two Republicans in those talks, Senator John Kyl and Eric Cantor, part of the House leadership, have warned Biden that they do not have total control over their caucus -- and that without massive spending cuts a deal cannot be reached.

A Democratic member of the talks said the threat of growing Republican opposition to a debt ceiling rise was a clear negotiating tactic. Yet he did not doubt the growing skepticism across the aisle was real.

Pawlenty has said the government should put debt interest payments ahead of other federal spending, an approach that would allow the government to prioritize obligations while a deal to dramatically cut spending is negotiated.

Ryan said last month that holders of government debt would be willing to miss payments "for a day or two or three or four" if it put the United States in a stronger position to pay them later on, and if investors knew that.

"That's what I'm hearing from most people," Ryan, the author of the House Republicans' budget plan, told CNBC. Sessions says the Obama administration's August 2 deadline is a "scare" tactic that has backfired.

FEARS OF CHAOS

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner says failure to increase the debt limit by August 2 will lead to a crisis in the markets that could plunge the back into recession.

Priya Misra, head of rates research at Bank of America-Merrill Lynch, said $25.6 billion in Treasury interest payments due on August 15 could be in jeopardy if the August 2 deadline is not met.

If the United States defaults, money market mutual funds that invest in short-term government bills, considered one of the most secure investments, could "break the buck" by falling below $1 a share, Misra said.

The resulting losses could spark a bank run of the sort seen when Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008.

Frum criticized Republican leaders for not sounding the alarm. "The real question is: who among the Republican leadership is saying 'you can't do this?' Frum said. "The leadership has not issued serious warnings to their own members."

John Boehner, the top Republican in the House, is trying to placate two audiences: Wall Street and his own restive caucus.

He said on June 1 that "nobody out there believes the is going to default on its debt." Yet he also says he understands "doubts" his own members have about raising it.

Jim Nussle, a former White House budget director under George W. Bush, has joined the default skeptics. "The worse that would happen is some form of rolling government shutdown, rather than a default," he said. "No-one's going to default."

Robert Tipp, chief investment officer at Prudential Fixed Income in Newark, says the yield on the 10-year Treasury note, now around an historically low 3 percent, could quickly jump 40 to 50 basis points if the debt ceiling is breached.

The impact on the dollar could be even greater, especially if ratings agencies cut America's credit rating.

"Foreigners don't buy Treasuries for the yield but for the safe-haven status," said Citigroup currency strategist Steven Englander. "If you do your best to blow up that safe-haven status, they won't want the dollar exposure. Their patience is not infinite."

"It would be a whole new world where people would be less inclined to purchase our debt, finance our deficits, it would definitely be a game changer globally," said Fifth Third's Mikelic.

(Additional reporting by Andy Sullivan, Karen Brettell, Richard Leong, Ellen Freilich, David Gaffen and Daniel Bass; Editing by Kristin Roberts, Stella Dawson and Sandra Maler)
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
From the Article:

"Foreigners don't buy Treasuries for the yield but for the safe-haven status," said Citigroup currency strategist Steven Englander. "If you do your best to blow up that safe-haven status, they won't want the dollar exposure. Their patience is not infinite."

"It would be a whole new world where people would be less inclined to purchase our debt, finance our deficits, it would definitely be a game changer globally," said Fifth Third's Mikelic.

Good! Works for me..if people won't buy or debt..then we either live within the means that the gov has or they print more worthless paper..drive inflation thru the roof and we become a 3rd world county with a worthless currency....

LOL, one thing that is really funny is that barry and his minions are lying about how big the debt is to begin with..They are not including 61.6 trillion dollars in "unfunded mandates" that they are responsible for..they just put them aside and not figure them into the budget or the debt....most are retirement programs such as SS and Medicare...

If corporations tried to do what the Fed gov does wth these type of liabilities (payments owed to employee pension funds) , they'd be in jail...but not the Gov. nope...they just ignore it and lay to the people....

It is said tat with these "unfunded manidates" amount to $527.000.00 per household....

Read it and weep:

U.S. funding for future promises lags by trillions

By Dennis Cauchon, USA TODAY
U.S. funding for future promises lags by trillions - USATODAY.com

The federal government's financial condition deteriorated rapidly last year, far beyond the $1.5 trillion in new debt taken on to finance the budget deficit, a USA TODAY analysis shows.

The government added $5.3 trillion in new financial obligations in 2010, largely for retirement programs such as Medicare and Social Security. That brings to a record $61.6 trillion the total of financial promises not paid for.

This gap between spending commitments and revenue last year equals more than one-third of the nation's gross domestic product.

Medicare alone took on $1.8 trillion in new liabilities, more than the record deficit prompting heated debate between Congress and the White House over lifting the debt ceiling.

STORY: Government's mountain of debt
Social Security added $1.4 trillion in obligations, partly reflecting longer life expectancies. Federal and military retirement programs added more to the financial hole, too.

Corporations would be required to count these new liabilities when they are taken on — and report a big loss to shareholders. Unlike businesses, however, Congress postpones recording spending commitments until it writes a check.

The $61.6 trillion in unfunded obligations amounts to $527,000 per household. That's more than five times what Americans have borrowed for everything else — mortgages, car loans and other debt. It reflects the challenge as the number of retirees soars over the next 20 years and seniors try to collect on those spending promises.

"The (federal) debt only tells us what the government owes to the public. It doesn't take into account what's owed to seniors, veterans and retired employees," says accountant Sheila Weinberg, founder of the Institute for Truth in Accounting, a Chicago-based group that advocates better financial reporting. "Without accurate accounting, we can't make good decisions."

Michael Lind, policy director at the liberal New America Foundation's economic growth program, says there is no near-term crisis for federal retirement programs and that economic growth will make these programs more affordable.

"The false claim that Social Security and Medicare are about to bankrupt the United States has been repeated for decades by conservatives and libertarians who pretend that their ideological opposition to these successful and cost-effective programs is based on worries about the deficit," he says.

USA TODAY has calculated federal finances based on standard accounting rules since 2004 using data from the Medicare and Social Security annual reports and the little-known audited financial report of the federal government.

The government has promised pension and health benefits worth more than $700,000 per retired civil servant. The pension fund's key asset: federal IOUs.
 
Last edited:

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
This is like teaching your children financial responsibility....they have an allowance that has to last all week and if they run out of money by Tuesday...sorry but payday is Friday....you'll do without....next week maybe you'll do better....not throw them more money....

make the WH and the Dems negotiate...screw wall street....they just speak to protect their customers and pocketbooks...
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
The only bad I see with this is that any good that comes from it automatically turns into "attaboy" points for the Dems and reelection. Part of me wanted the Dems to keep control of Congress just to keep the president's approval points in the tank. But because the Repubs have control of the House, the pres is forced to scale back his socialist mantra, and the people love him more for it. Kinda like Clinton in 96.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
I don't think it happens as with Clinton....the people are raising h*ll for spending cuts now and more of them now... they see that barry and dems aren't willing to make them of any great impact....when the Repub force a "default" and I hope they do and they take it out for months and the economy takes a hit which i hoe it does, the people will understand that it was caused by barry and the left...but even if they don't if we default for a major amount of time, short term (a week) isn't going to inflict enough pain all the way around, but a major default of a month or so will create a situation that will sink barry and the dems for a long time to come...

Now that being said, when barry gets the boot and the dems take another big hit, then they had better do whats expected and get back to a smaller government..or they will pay the price come election time...yea alot of people (especially the entitlement crowrd still have their hand out and head up their backside, but more and more independents and moderate left leaning are coming around and seeing the bs from barry....

Let the right force the issue crash the economy and live with the hardtimes as we rebuild....but i don't honestly see the default as that big an issue...its more of another "scare tactic to get the debt ceiling raised so the barry and his finanical minions can continue to spend money we don't have....
 
Last edited:

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
I don't think it happens as with Clinton....the people are raising h*ll for spending cuts now and more of them now... they see that barry and dems aren't willing to make them of any great impact....when the Repub force a "default" and I hope they do and they take it out for months and the economy takes a hit which i hoe it does, the people will understand that it was caused by barry and the left...but even if they don't if we default for a major amount of time, short term (a week) isn't going to inflict enough pain all the way around, but a major default of a month or so will create a situation that will sink barry and the dems for a long time to come...

Now that being said, when barry gets the boot and the dems take another big hit, then they had better do whats expected and get back to a smaller government..or they will pay the price come election time...yea alot of people (especially the entitlement crowrd still have their hand out and head up their backside, but more and more independents and moderate left leaning are coming around and seeing the bs from barry....

Let the right force the issue crash the economy and live with the hardtimes as we rebulid....

A "tightie rightie" with a buck can be a good thing...:p
 

tbubster

Seasoned Expediter
to me anybody with a 1/4 of a brain can read this and see how self servering it is to the left. it talks about how the banks and wall street are saying how bad this is gonna be.funny how the left wants everyone to listen to some of the very people they blame for the problems we face.also funny how when bush said the debt celing needed to be raised obama said it just proves that bush faild as a leader!:eek:
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
An idea once confined to the fringe of the Republican party is seeping into its mainstream -- that a brief default might be an acceptable price to pay if it forces the White House to deal with runaway spending.

This is the problem, thinking that they need Obama to compromise shows that the republican party is as ignorant as many of the public school kids as are many who just don't get it.

They need to tie it all up in the congress, stop chasing Obama as if he is the most important person and force the changes they were elected to do. In the past we have had congresses pass legislation veto proof and if they hold the line, they will win but the problem is the old guard republican wants to compromise.

Ryan's plan is short to what it should be. We need serious cuts, not cuts based on an outdated idea that things will be revisited. Cut across the board 10% with everything except soldier's pay and then cut again. NOT this 10 year projection crap.
 
Top