Rejecting The "Gatekeepers" That Seek to Limit The Discussion ...

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
... and by so doing control the narrative.

Swarthmore Hillel - the Jewish Student Organization at Swarthmore College - opens the door wide ... by be willing to give anti-Zionists their ears and a platform:

By Swarthmore Hillel Board, 2013-2014

On November 11, former speaker of the Israeli Knesset Avraham Burg was supposed to give a talk on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at the Harvard Hillel house. Instead, Hillel barred him from speaking at the Hillel house, and he ended up giving his talk in an undergraduate dormitory on campus. The reason he was barred? His talk was co-sponsored by the Harvard College Palestinian Solidarity Committee.

Sadly, for organizations bearing the name "Hillel," situations like these are all too common. Across the country, many Hillels have banned Breaking the Silence, an organization of Israeli soldiers that facilitates talks about the Israeli military and West Bank occupation. Jewish Voice for Peace, which seeks "peace and justice for all peoples of the Middle East," has never been allowed to affiliate with Hillels. On some campuses, J Street has had a difficult time working with Hillels, and events co-sponsored by Students for Justice in Palestine or Palestine Solidarity Committees have often been banned ...

(continues at link below)
Defying Hillel rules, Swarthmore chapter invites anti-Zionists to come on in

#blowback
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
And it gets even better:

This is exciting news. After Swarthmore Hillel voted unanimously last weekend to open its doors to everyone who wants to discuss the conflict, including anti-Zionists, the president of Hillel International yesterday slammed the window on Swarthmore Hillel.

And Swarthmore Hillel has responded, We stand by our resolution.

You can read Hillel President Eric Fingerhut’s letter below, and it is emphatic: No anti-Zionists allowed. On these principles we will never waver. Israel is the “democratic, open, pluralistic home of the Jewish people.” So Israel is open, but not the U.S. (When Jewish life has teemed with anti-Zionists for the entire history of Zionism.)


Swarthmore Hillel has written back to Eric Fingerhut in the most diplomatic language. It is also unwavering.

As you read these two letters, judge who is the wiser, and more thoughtful.
Swarthmore Hillel stands by opening to anti-Zionists-- as int'l org says, not 'under our roof'

#wishfingerhutgoodluckwiththat
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
This is the pretty face of a little fascist right-wing thug (Ayelet Shaked, a member of the Israeli Knesset):

Screen-Shot-2013-01-23-at-10.50.38-AM.png

 
Last edited:

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
The following 3 page article is an excerpt from Max Blumenthal's new book: Goliath: Life and Loathing In Greater Israel.

It is said to be what utterly infuriated Nation columnist Eric Alterman and drove him to write 9 or 10 unhinged ranting screeds attacking Blumenthal (and his family) ... forevermore rendering Alterman himself to the status of an absolute putz ...

In terms of what's going on with attempts by Israel and it's supporters to limit, suppress, and sanitize the conversation, it is a real eye-popper:

Israel Cranks Up the PR Machine | The Nation
 
Last edited:

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Change and a tectonic shift in dialog:

The wheels may be coming off a wee bit faster than expected. Articles in two leading Jewish papers on the Mandela funeral and the clumsy official Israeli response concede the similarity of conditions in Palestine to apartheid in South Africa. Both articles use moral language. The Forward says that Israel may well face extinction ala South Africa. The Jewish Week says Israel cannot remove the indelible stain of supporting apartheid.

(Article continues at link below)
'Jewish Week' and 'Forward' now speak of apartheid in West Bank
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
A rather large fact not to mention.
It's a fact whose inclusion might render the story in a somewhat different light in the minds of at least some readers.

The Jerusalem Post is an English language newspaper - so there's that aspect as well (the intended audience)
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
How the narrative gets "framed" so as to cast the far more powerful and much more well-off party in a dispute as the "victim":

Lately Jodi Rudoren of the New York Times has been passing along Israeli hasbara to Americans in an unquestioning manner. Today she has an article putting forward the Israeli view that certain Palestinian statements about Israel constitute “incitement” of hatred – and that’s why Palestinians don’t deserve a state. The New York Times has further underwritten that view by publishing the Israeli government report (which I am told reflects work by this lobby group led by a radical settler) about Palestinian incitement.

(Article continues at link below)
‘NYT’ casts Israelis as victims of Palestinians who complain bitterly about oppression

If true, it's a rather interesting fact about the video (with false subtitling) that NYT included in the article having absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Palestine ... talk about your blatant lies foisted off on an unsuspecting public ...
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
The fear - and its stench - of an honest, open discussion is palpable ... from the Jewish Daily Forward:

Feud Over Hillel Pro-Israel Rule Sparks New Controversy at California College

David Harris-Gershon Barred From Speaking at Santa Barbara

w-gershonharris-12514.jpg
Stay Away: David Harris-Gershon signs copies of his book, ‘What Do You Buy the Children of the Terrorist Who Tried to Kill Your Wife.’ He hoped to bring the book’s message of reconciliation to the University of California at Santa Barbara, but the Hillel chapter scrapped his appearance.

By Michael Kaplan

Published January 28, 2014.

It all started innocently enough: The Israel Committee of Santa Barbara, Calif., which works with the local chapter of Hillel, American Jewry’s on campus program for students, invited author David Harris-Gershon to keynote its annual Israel educational event in April.

Harris-Gershon expected to talk about his recent book, which tells the tale of his reconciliation with the family of a Palestinian terrorist who nearly killed his wife.

Yet after extending the invitation, leaders of the Hillel chapter learned that Harris-Gershon, a self-proclaimed progressive Zionist who supports Israel as a Jewish state and backs a two-state solution, had also publicly endorsed the Boycott, Divestment, Sanction movement. On Jan. 8, they decided to rescind the invitation, citing the still-raw atmosphere following a campus push for divestment from Israel last year.

That stunned Harris-Gershon, particularly given that the focus of his talk was to be on his book – not boycotting Israel.

Thus, just one month after a feud broke out between Hillel International and its Swarthmore College chapter over its pro-Israel guidelines, began the latest chapter in the ongoing controversy on another college campus some 3,000 miles away.

“It’s an example of how far an organization can go to limit dialogue and debate based upon Hillel International’s guidelines,” said Harris-Gershon. “How on earth does Hillel intend to actually advertise itself as an open place for university students when large swaths of university students won’t [fit in]?”

The author even wrote a statement expressing his support for Israel’s right to exist as a democratic Jewish state, a document he called a “loyalty oath.” He says he did so at the behest of organizers; they deny asking him to do so. Either way, it didn’t sway them to change their minds.

Rabbi Evan Goodman, executive director of the Hillel chapter at the University of California, Santa Barbara, strongly stood by the decision, noting it was taken against the backdrop of a tense environment on campus following debate over a resolution supported by pro-Palestinian groups calling on the University of California to divest from Israeli companies.
Link to original article - with a clarification and correction of the Forward's reporting by Gershon-Harris in the comments section:

Feud Over Hillel Pro-Israel Rule Sparks New Controversy at California College - Forward.com

When the facts are not one's side, and one is one the wrong side of history, then McCarthyite tactics are one of the only avenues available ...
 
Last edited:
Top