Racial Preferences in barrys healthcare bill

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Well heres more stuff in the healthcare bill that they wanted to keep quiet and from the people, lol its not only Un-Constitutional, its illegal under the Civil Rights Act of 1964! But hey as we all know barry taught Constitutional law, it is a certain that he knows more about it then any of us.....but i guess he missed this item as well as others in the last 6 months...but, we all know how he feels about the Constitution and Bill of Rights.....


Racial Preferences in the Democrats' Health Care Bill

By Allan J. Favish

All 1,018 pages of the Democrats' health care bill can be inspected here.

http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/111/pdf/publications/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf

The bill includes racial preferences. Under the Democrats' health care bill, if a medical school wants to increase its chances of receiving many different kinds of grants and contracts from the federal government, it should have a demonstrated record of training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups. This is because the Democrats' health care bill requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to give preference to the entities that have demonstrated such a record in the awarding of these contracts to medical schools and other institutions.

The bill does not state what would qualify as a "demonstrated record", so we can expect medical schools and the other entities to do whatever they think they can get away with to train as many "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" as they think they might need to have a better "demonstrated record" in this regard then other entities competing for the grants and contracts. The Democrats' health care bill creates a very significant financial incentive for medical schools and other entities to lower admission standards for "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" if that is what it takes to have the winning "demonstrated record".

On page 879-880, the bill states that the Secretary of Health and Human Services
"shall make grants to, or enter into contracts with, eligible entities . . . to operate a professional training program in the field of family medicine, general internal medicine, general pediatrics, or geriatrics, to provide financial assistance and traineeships and fellowships to those students, interns, residents or physicians who plan to work in or teach in the field of family medicine, general internal medicine, general pediatrics, or geriatrics."

On page 881-882 the bill states:
"In awarding grants or contracts under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds."

On page 883 the bill states:
"The Secretary shall make grants to, or enter into contracts with, eligible entities . . . to operate or participate in an established primary care residency training program, which may include-(A) planning and developing curricula; (B) recruitment and training of residents; and (C) retention of faculty."

On page 884-885 the bill states:
"In awarding grants and contracts . . . the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of training . . . individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds . . . ."

On page 887-889 the bill states that the
"Secretary shall make grants to, or enter into contracts with, eligible entities . . . to operate a professional training program for oral health professionals, to provide financial assistance and traineeships and fellowships to those professionals who plan to work in or teach general, pediatric, or public health dentistry, or dental hygiene, to establish, maintain, or improve academic administrative units (including departments, divisions, or other appropriate units) in the specialties of general, pediatric, or public health dentistry, to operate a loan repayment program for full-time faculty in a program of general, pediatric, or public health dentistry."

On page 889-890 the bill states:
"In awarding grants or contracts under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds."

On page 908-909 the bill states: "The Secretary shall award grants and contracts to eligible entities" to do the same things for the field of public health as the Secretary can do for dentistry.

On page 909 the bill states:
"In awarding grants or contracts under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds."

Apart from the legality of such preferences under the U.S. Constitution and the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and the unfairness to those who are not "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups", the Democrats' policy will foster the racial preference climate that continues to stigmatize and demean those individuals who receive the preferences. For example, if you know nothing else about two university students, except that one was probably admitted under a program where intellectual standards were reduced and the student received a preference for being the child of an alumnus, and the other was admitted under more rigorous intellectual standards without receiving any nonmerit-based preference, what are you going to think about these two students? Is the answer any different when the preference is based on race rather than an alumni relationship?

A nonmerit-based preference program based on an individual's physical appearance or surname is no less a "badge of inferiority" than the one condemned in Brown v. Board of Education. Thanks to the Democrats' racial preference program, all of the "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" at these medical schools and other entities, including those who deserved admission without the racial preference, will wear that badge.

Allan J. Favish is an attorney in Los Angeles. His website is allanfavish.com.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...he_demo_1.html
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Check out pp. 425-430. There you will find the provisions for MANDATORY COUNSELING FOR SENIOR CITIZENS, to be administered at least every five years and perhaps more often depending on the individual's circumstances. One can imagine the indoctrination that would take place during these sessions conducted by your friendly government counselor; included would surely be an explanation why you are not able to receive life-saving cancer treatments or heart medication at age 68 because that care has been rationed to another younger person with a longer life expectancy as shown by government actuarial tables. No doubt that failure to attend the mandatory counseling sessions would result in denial of Medicare benefits. There you have it - more HOPE and CHANGE from THE CHOSEN ONE - Barack Hussein Obama.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
It is a VERY short step from abortion to "seniorcide" The left have ALWAYS been a big fan of not treating by age or lack of "use" to sociaty. England does a LOT of that sort of thing.
 

pelicn

Veteran Expediter
It's more of the progressive agenda! :mad: Anyone listening to Glenn Beck? Obama is a Community Organizer, if you know that, then EVERYTHING he does makes sense. WE have to find a way to STOP HIM before he totally destroys our country.
 
Top