Dale,
I respect your beliefs and your take on religion but I have issues with some of what is being said and being one who isn't defensive about my religion because it is between me and God, I find what the author is saying comes about to be more true more often than not.
I am not one who believes I need to get closer to God, I believe his mandate to me and others is to live as he wants us to live so I choose that path and stick to it of which when I made that commitment, I got as close to him as I could. I'm not perfect and do charitable things, I try to be considerate and take in account the impact I have on others but I don't demand others to follow me or tell others there is only one path to follow, God understands we are individuals and make our own way.
I also believe that the modernization of religion for the purpose of man is a determent to those who want to find that true meaning as he spoke of in the old testament and as Jesus spoke of in the new. Comparably speaking I find that religion has been tailored to man's changing environment and needs, not man changing for the word.
This is one of the themes I get from the Author, his position is what I've seen for years, and his list of 13 items seems to fit into the mold of those who scream about how Christian they are but seem to follow the same greed and selfishness - it is all about the person. The first five I would think is part of the mandate from God in any religion, be it Christian, Judaism or Muslim but the other eight are not and this is where I think the problem sits when I speak of greed and selfishness.
Many Christian mock the Muslims and even the Jews for following those first five steps, but fail to understand that it isn't about them and their religion, but respecting others. A common failure among the right leaning religious types epitomized with Santorum's ignorant comments about Islam in today's society.
Out of my collection of Bibles, I can turn to any one of them and I can't find things that people are talking about in those eight points - I don't find harry potter and don't see where I have to argue with anyone. I can't find where I need to attend a specific church or be saved (call me old fashioned but for those who came before me, especially before Gutenberg and the printing press didn't read the bible but practiced the same thing as I am practicing). So my point is that to me, the author seems to be speaking about not the truly devote, but those opportunist in the church. He isn't saying that the religion itself is bad but some who represent the religion as we accept them representing it.