This part is confusing to me.....say a load is sent out to van owner paying $600, how much should driver espect?
This part is confusing to me.....say a load is sent out to van owner paying $600, how much should driver espect?
The van owner says that if a job pays $600...1/3 goes to the trucking company, 1/3 to her as owner, and 1/3 to driver...then driver and owner split the cost of the gas. Is this reasonable?
Whatever the "job pays" is after the trucking company takes their cut, unless the van owner always gets to see the line haul bill the carrier charges for the load. If the line hul bill is $600, and the carrier takes 33.3%, or $200, then the "job" (which is hauling the load) pays $400 (to the truck, which, for now, is the only thing you need to be concerned about). On a 60/40 split, that would be $240 and $160, with whoever pays for fuel getting the $240.The van owner says that if a job pays $600...1/3 goes to the trucking company, 1/3 to her as owner, and 1/3 to driver...then driver and owner split the cost of the gas. Is this reasonable?
No. Whoever is paying for the fuel gets the FSC.Ok so if my owner is paying me only 40% should I be getting the 100% of FSC if she is paying for the fuel?
No. You should be getting 40% of the load, not 40% of her net after her expenses.Also, should she be subtracting the $50.00 per week that she is paying into escrow off the top of the amount paid to her for the entire load, then paying me the 40% cut?
YesSo my pay should be 40% of the load?
Yes. Because she gets the escrow back when her relationship with the carrier ends.Out of her 60% she should be subtracting her 50.00 escrow?
Getting 60% plus the FSC comes out a little better in the long run, but not dramatically so. A 60/40 or a 40/60 is fair, either way.If she pays for fuel, tolls, repairs, etc, is 40% good or should I talk to her about 60/40 split with me paying for fuel. What is the advantage of the 60/40 split and would I make more money long term?
No that's on you. It's you insurance against injury and accidents while under a load. It won't cover you for any accidents while you're not loaded, so be extra careful when not loaded if you don't have health insurance. But if you're ever injured while loaded, you'll be glad you got it. Trust me on that one. I have some experience witrh that.Oh and should I be paying the $32.04 per week for occupational insurance or does owner pay that?
Thank youYes
Yes. Because she gets the escrow back when her relationship with the carrier ends.
Getting 60% plus the FSC comes out a little better in the long run, but not dramatically so. A 60/40 or a 40/60 is fair, either way.
No that's on you. It's you insurance against injury and accidents while under a load. It won't cover you for any accidents while you're not loaded, so be extra careful when not loaded if you don't have health insurance. But if you're ever injured while loaded, you'll be glad you got it. Trust me on that one. I have some experience witrh that.
In trucking, the escrow is a monetary account to be used in an emergency to handle some of the expenses that will occur if there is any damage, freight claims, etc. Like, if you have Qualcomm equipment, and it gets damaged or you fail to turn it back in when you leave a carrier, the carrier will use the escrow money to help recover those costs. If you are off some some eason for weeks or months, your weekly deductions for insurance and occupational accident insurance still keep happening and getting paid, and if you don't come back or something, the carrier will use the escrow funds to pay for that.What is this escrow about?
Not if the carrier is smart. The last thing a carrier wants to do is get between a dispute betwen a vehicle owner and a driver. The carrier's contract is with the vehicle owner, and they pay the owner accordingly. What the owner does with that money is really none of the carrier's business.Does the carrier company have any say as to the agreement between owner and driver?