Onion Article Picked Up as Fact

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
This is what happens when you believe even half the crap you read on the Internet. If it fits with your agenda, you believe it without checking it out, and then usually post the same crap somewhere else on the Internet, thereby perpetuating the crap. And when you do that, you look just as foolish as those wacky Iranians.

By JASON KEYSER
APTRANS.gif


updated 9/29/2012 7:43:28 PM ET

CHICAGO — A joke by the satirical website The Onion appears to have gotten lost in translation.

An Iranian news agency picked up — as fact — a story from the paper about a supposed Gallup survey showing an overwhelming majority of rural white Americans would rather vote for Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad than President Barack Obama. But it was made up, like everything in the just-for-laughs newspaper, which is headquartered in Chicago.

The English-language service of Iran's semi-official Fars news agency republished the story Friday, several days after it appeared in The Onion.
The Iranian version copied the original word-for-word, even including a made-up quote from a fictional West Virginia resident who says he'd rather go to a baseball game with Ahmadinejad because "he takes national defense seriously, and he'd never let some gay protesters tell him how to run his country like Obama does."

Homosexual acts are punishable by death in Iran, and Ahmadinejad famously said during a 2007 appearance at Columbia University that "in Iran we don't have homosexuals like in your country."

The Iranian version of the article leaves out only The Onion's description of Ahmadinejad as "a man who has repeatedly denied the Holocaust and has had numerous political prisoners executed."

The article was featured prominently on the Fars website alongside its usual fare of stories about advances in Iranian military technology, condemnation of Israel and Iran's nuclear program. The story appeared to have been taken down by about mid-day Friday, Chicago time.

Calls to Fars representatives were not answered Friday.

The Onion reveled in the fact that it had been taken seriously.

Onion editor Will Tracy put out a tongue-in-cheek statement that referred to Fars as "a subsidiary of The Onion" that has acted as the paper's Middle Eastern bureau since it was founded in the mid-1980s by Onion publisher T. Herman Zweibel.

"The Onion freely shares content with Fars and commends the journalists at Iran's Finest News Source on their superb reportage," Tracy said in jest.

It's not the first time a foreign news outlet has been duped by The Onion. In 2002, the Beijing Evening News, one of the Chinese capital's biggest newspapers, picked up a story from The Onion that claimed members of Congress were threatening to leave Washington unless the building underwent a makeover that included more bathrooms and a retractable dome.
 

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I don't know anything about this Onion website. Just curious as to how one "checks it out" to find out what is true and false in any story, from any website. Do they look on the internet? Can someone list five news sources that they trust?
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Five? Good luck. I could have given you one but Paul Harvey is no longer with us. Now it's a matter of degree of distrust just as it's a matter of begrudgingly asking for a D+ when the other option is an F.

Vote Mormon not Moron
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
I don't know anything about this Onion website. Just curious as to how one "checks it out" to find out what is true and false in any story, from any website.
Do they look on the internet?

I do, because it's all I've got. I like to check things on Wiki, but it's important to check their sources [footnotes] because sometimes, it paints a different story.
And I love to read the comments following stories in the news - the differences between readers of Fox, WSJ, the Onion, Atlantic Monthly, and the BBC are pretty striking. But you can tell who knows whereof they comment, and who's just blowing smoke.

Can someone list five news sources that they trust?

No matter how much you trust a source, mistakes get made, and wrong info gets repeated, but I generally find the BBC to be pretty reliable - without the right/left bias that many of our own news orgs display.
 

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
No matter how much you trust a source, mistakes get made, and wrong info gets repeated, but I generally find the BBC to be pretty reliable - without the right/left bias that many of our own news orgs display.

Well see, there you go. You say the BBC is pretty reliable without the left right bias. I say the BBC has a left bias imho. Ever check out also the comments after a story posted by CNN on their electronic media site? Rabid I tell you.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
The Onion is a 100% satire site. It's like Mad Magazine. It's all made up. It doesn't even pretend to be true.

As for trusted news sources, there is no single source that I'd trust 100%. One of the basic rules of journalism when sourcing a story is to get confirmation from at least two independent sources. That wouldn't mean, for example, getting the story from a blog at Fox News and confirming it at The Blaze and then WND. It certainly wouldn't mean Googling a story and seeing the same story on 90,000 Web sites and assuming the story is true because it's at so many places.

You can trust a left or right leaning site for the truth if you know how to read a news story and know how to separate the Five W's from any commentary, and then confirm those Five W's with other news sources. The biggest thing when reading a news story is to dismiss the commentary which tells you how to react to or what to think about the story, and stick to the Five W's. Often that means reading between the lines of a biased report to discern what they are trying hard not to plainly say.

The BBC is left, but not really so much on news stories as they are with opinion pieces. But no matter, CNN is certainly left, so is the AP. But you can still get to the facts and the truth from any of those sources if you can compare and contrast the Five W's found within them to other sources.

Incidentally, I rarely read the reader comments after a story. I don't want them trying to tell me what to think of the story, either.
 
Last edited:

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
"The Onion is a 100% satire site. It's like Mad Magazine. It's all made up. It doesn't even pretend to be true"


Say it ain't so!
:p
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Incidentally, I rarely read the reader comments after a story. I don't want them trying to tell me what to think of the story, either.

OTOH, I love it when people try to tell me what to think - it's amusing. ;)
I do like reading what 'they' think, though - there are some pretty bright people out there, and some witty ones, too. And some who make me feel smart, lol.
 

skyraider

Veteran Expediter
US Navy
"The Onion is a 100% satire site. It's like Mad Magazine. It's all made up. It doesn't even pretend to be true"


Say it ain't so!
:p
I like Mad Magazine, well at least when we were kids, wish I had my old copies, dang this throw away society.
 

Mdbtyhtr

Expert Expediter
There was a time, particularly the Walter Cronkite era, when reporters had respect and decorum. They would never go to print or air unless the story was fact checked and verified first. Unfortunately, I cannot provide one example currently that adheres to the old standards. Ignorant people are easily led and lazy people, those that won't even attempt a verification however rudimentary, will continue in their fog of apathy.

Scott
 
Top