On the deportation of Piers Morgan

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
I knew "The Rights of an Englishman" were long dead, but I thought they were at least appreciated, in a nostalgic way. The original article at this address has links to supporting info.
http://lewrockwell.com/mcmaken/mcmaken148.html

I Hate Piers Morgan, But He Shouldn't Be Deported

by Ryan McMaken

True Confession: I used to watch Celebrity Apprentice. Thus, my first introduction to Piers Morgan was in his role as a despicable self-promoter on that show several years ago. Being the domain of D-list celebrities who are usually on the fast train to oblivion, like Drug-War enthusiast Stephen Baldwin, I was surprised to hear that Morgan had been upgraded from Celebrity Apprentice fame to C-list celebrity when he was given a talk show on CNN.

Now, he's lecturing us about the evils of private property in the form of gun ownership. The British have long despised liberty, of course. One only need look at their dirty, crime-ridden, totalitarian little island, where they fear kitchen knives and murder sick babies, to see that. With the murderous British Empire with its concentration camps and death squads no longer available to Morgan, he apparently wants to spread British Enlightenment by other means to the few corners of the Anglosphere where a small amount of liberty remains. The natural right to bear arms, one of those "English liberties" we preserved by throwing the British out of our country for good, is under attack by Morgan, a man who is a proven monger of fake news stories, and possible hacker of people's private phones.

Many Americans who have taken exception to Morgan's lecturing have petitioned the White House to deport him. In this matter, I must dissent. Since the days of the Alien and Sedition Acts, deportation has been the tool of tyrants and out-of-control lovers of government. Deportation is a quintessential tool of the state in which state agents kidnap people and ship them off by force to some foreign locale. Cases in which the deported have committed violent crimes and enjoyed due process is one thing, but all too often we must endure the crazed demands of the deportation-happy nationalists who wish to throw people out of the country for the non-crime of being "undocumented" workers or, in Morgan's case, for exercising his natural right to free speech.

Fetishists for government paperwork, such as the anti-immigration crowd, will complain that these immigrant non-criminals are "illegal" of course, but cries for "law and order" against the non-violent has long been the battle-cry of incorrigible statists and other enemies of freedom. Surely, some of the same crowd are today behind the drive to deport Morgan for his having insulted their delicate nationalist sensibilities. They wish to prove Morgan right, it seems, by showing we are an ill-tempered people who resort to violence the minute someone insults us. No thank you. I can do without Morgan's whining, but not at the price of encouraging yet another immoral deportation in the name of loving America. As Mencken once noted, protecting our freedoms often consists of defending the most unpopular people among us. Let us hope that Piers Morgan may soon qualify as such.

Copyright © 2012 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
When Rockwell wizens up enough to recognize illegal entry into the nation as the criminal act that it is perhaps he'll be worth listening to. Until then he should just shut up, listen and learn.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
When Rockwell wizens up enough to recognize illegal entry into the nation as the criminal act that it is perhaps he'll be worth listening to. Until then he should just shut up, listen and learn.
... said by someone who is apparently incapable of making the observation that the piece wasn't written by Rockwell ... but by Ryan McMaken ....

How does one measure the sheer stupidity of those who are inclined to run off at the mouth about something of their own construction, the very premise of which (which was that it was Lew Rockwell speaking) is shown to be false, by what was proffered by the OP, and which said poster is commenting on.

Can anyone seriously wonder why I wouldn't want such an individual roaming around, armed, at a school where my children were in attendance ?

Some folks come up just a little short in the "ability to observe the obvious" department ...

Of course, these same folks are often quite certain as to the absolute infallibility of their own (often flawed) observations ... to say nothing of their reasoning ...
 
Last edited:

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
When Rockwell wizens up enough to recognize illegal entry into the nation as the criminal act that it is perhaps he'll be worth listening to. Until then he should just shut up, listen and learn.
Lew didn't write that. That was one of his contributors.
Lew does believe in open borders, though. Nobody's perfect.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I stand corrected. I don't claim perfection though. It's McMaken although I'm not sure that Rockwell doesn't think somewhat similarly on that particular issue.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Yes they do. Between the House and Senate, we have 535 of them.
A little additional math might be appropriate, to compliment your premise:

535 + 9 + 1

Of course there's plenty more arithmetic beyond that that could be done ...
 
Last edited:

whistler

Active Expediter
When Rockwell wizens up enough to recognize illegal entry into the nation as the criminal act that it is perhaps he'll be worth listening to. Until then he should just shut up, listen and learn.
wizen
wiz·en (wzn)
v. wiz·ened, wiz·en·ing, wiz·ens
v.intr.
To dry up; wither or shrivel.
v.tr.
To cause to wither, shrivel, or dry up.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Sometimes you win and sometimes you lose with autocorrection. If that's all you got out of it more's the pity.
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
wizen
wiz·en (wzn)
v. wiz·ened, wiz·en·ing, wiz·ens
v.intr.
To dry up; wither or shrivel.
v.tr.
To cause to wither, shrivel, or dry up.

I think you are confusing the definition with "wise-a$$".:rolleyes:
 
Top