You probably have a point. It is show business.
You know it is all about show business, it has nothing to do with the candidate, the issue or his ability to lead. This is why I am asking.
I have searched and found nothing he really did to speak of on the state or federal level. I am still waiting to hear his accomplishments, but truthfully he fell into the senate seat just like Wilson fell into the governorship of New Jersey. After reading the events that took place, it was like reading a spy novel.
However, is this worst than Bush banning people who may not agree with him?
When did bush ban anyone? Are you talking about that reporter who falsified his credentials to get access to the WH pressroom? I don't agree that the guy should even had the right to complain, the same with Helen Thomas, she should just fade away.
Also just an FYI, Bush has ever right to put the editors of the NY times and other news papers on trial as traitors for printing secrets. These guys should face execution for what damage they did. The first Amendment does not afford them the rights to print top secret information nor does it mean that they are above the law. He has for all intent and purpose been vilified more than any other president, including Nixon in the press and has done nothing to stop the press. AND another FYI, the two presidents who were really damaging to the press was democrat presidents, Wilson and FDR. If it was up to them, they would have thrown out the first amendment and replaces with pure evil censorship.
Why don't you just get someone you can support, and talk about them?
I can't find anyone, that's the problem. There is not a real candidate standing up there. I can't support McCain, Hillary is my last choice of a vote but the more I read about Obama, the more I think he is wrong about things.
He was smarter than most up there. He didn't vote for this useless war. He didn't fall for the lies that sling shots were weapons of mass destruction. Didn't take much to fool the rest though.
How could he vote for the war, he wasn't a senator. You know you got to stop blaming the US and Bush for the war and blame Carter and the UN. The UN set the mandate, we carried it out - so what. With the up and coming war in the Balkans, I say let the US sit it out, they have been fighting for 400 or 500 years, why shed our blood to ensure liberty and freedom. Let's pull out of NATO, the EU is building an army to fight who ever.
As far as WMD, ok let's take the canisters they found which was confirmed to contain Sarin nerve agent and forget about them. It seems that the UN won't confirm anything that we found as legitimate because of Cofi Anan's position that it was an illegal war to cover up what his son and his friends were doing with the 'oil for food' money. Whats worst, having a president go to war over an mandate or the UN's corruption continue?
