Does it really matter who the running mate is?
Given that the election will probably be very close in several battleground states, the selection of a running mate can make the difference. With Romney understood to be a Northeastern moderate GOP'er, he would be wise to seek a Southern conservative giving regional and philosophical balance to the ticket. Conservatives are already leery and unenthusiastic about Romney. Choosing a solid conservative would shore-up his bonafides with the base. Romney isn't exactly one of us(conservatives) but is widely seen as an improvement over Obama.Does it really matter who the running mate is?
That's because voters are, chiefly, stupid, and think who the vice-president is makes a difference. It's the most irrelevant job there is. The few times he gets to sit at the big person's table for dinner, they still don't give him anything sharper than a butter knife. Choosing a solid conservative, whatever that means, isn't going to make one wit of difference in Romney The President. THe vice-president makes no policy and has very little say in it. Those who are already leery and unenthusiastic about Romney should remain so, regardless of who his running mate is, because once the election is over, it's all Romney.Given that the election will probably be very close in several battleground states, the selection of a running mate can make the difference.
That's because voters are, chiefly, stupid, and think who the vice-president is makes a difference. It's the most irrelevant job there is. The few times he gets to sit at the big person's table for dinner, they still don't give him anything sharper than a butter knife. Choosing a solid conservative, whatever that means, isn't going to make one wit of difference in Romney The President. THe vice-president makes no policy and has very little say in it. Those who are already leery and unenthusiastic about Romney should remain so, regardless of who his running mate is, because once the election is over, it's all Romney.
That's because voters are, chiefly, stupid, and think who the vice-president is makes a difference. It's the most irrelevant job there is. The few times he gets to sit at the big person's table for dinner, they still don't give him anything sharper than a butter knife. Choosing a solid conservative, whatever that means, isn't going to make one wit of difference in Romney The President. THe vice-president makes no policy and has very little say in it. Those who are already leery and unenthusiastic about Romney should remain so, regardless of who his running mate is, because once the election is over, it's all Romney.
Does it really matter who the running mate is?
They can cause a lot of trouble though. Just look at Biden.
They can cause a lot of trouble though. Just look at Biden.
It would if Christie was the running mate!!!
Can you imagine the Greatness that would be Restored in this Country if we could have Christie there in the White House for the next 16 years??? (8 as VP and 8 as the Prez!!)
They would make a new Mt Rushmore dedicated to Christie himself if this Dream would come true!!
Kinda proves my point that voters are, chiefly, just butt stoopid. For single issue voters in general elections, they're not chiefly butt stoopid, they're absolutely butt stoopid. Rice's position on abortion will not have any impact on Romney's, or anyone else's. Neither will Rubio's positions have any impact. If Rice were the vice-president, it wouldn't signal the immediate end to the fighting of Roe v. Wade, anymore than Rubio's postions will mean conservative mana from heaven. I don't deny that voters can be swayed, led and duped into casting their all-important vote based on something that's not important, but once all the voting is over, we're still left with Romney, the whole Romney, and nothing but the Romney, so help me Joseph.Yes. Here is an example. Last week Condileeza Rice was rumored as a favorite to be the V.P.
Many were in a uproar because she was pro choice. Picking her would have caused a low turnout from evangelicals. Picking someone like Marco Rubio would create even more enthusiasm from conservatives, help with the latino vote , and would bring in a lot of fundraising money.
Regarding Rice, it is more than just being pro choice. She served in the Bush administration for eight years and rightly or wrongly would be hammered for it and cause too much of a distraction.Kinda proves my point that voters are, chiefly, just butt stoopid. For single issue voters in general elections, they're not chiefly butt stoopid, they're absolutely butt stoopid. Rice's position on abortion will not have any impact on Romney's, or anyone else's. Neither will Rubio's positions have any impact. If Rice were the vice-president, it wouldn't signal the immediate end to the fighting of Roe v. Wade, anymore than Rubio's postions will mean conservative mana from heaven. I don't deny that voters can be swayed, led and duped into casting their all-important vote based on something that's not important, but once all the voting is over, we're still left with Romney, the whole Romney, and nothing but the Romney, so help me Joseph.