I didn't even name the carrier and the post disappeared.
That's true - but I knew who you were talking about - even if you didn't have the cajhones to actually say who it was .....
I have copies of every post.
As do I .....
I guess I am a little confused, because I can email you copies of the threads that were deleted.
Be interesting to see if your and my copies would agree .....
Personally, I don't believe it was your doing, but more so, a subordinate who has a bone to pick.
Might not be so much a case of a bone to pick, as much as it might someone with enough common sense to save you from yourself ..... how does the saying go ?:
"When you've dug yourself into a hole, why not just put down the shovel and stop digging ?"
It was only my intention to inform others in regards to those carriers who disseminate confusing rates and policies.
For you to say that the above
was your only intention is, at best, a misrepresentation, and perhaps others, less charitable than I, would call it a blatant, outright lie. If you truly believe that to be true, then you are not even being honest with yourself, much less us .....
One would only need to examine the
tone and content of the words in your posting, in the most recent thread to be deleted, to draw a conculsion about what your "motivations" truly were .....
Your response gave me pause for reflection.
Easy words to say - personally, I'll be looking for evidence of that in your future posts ..... should there be any.
In response to highway star:
If you can find a post of mine that indicates otherwise please bring it to my attention.
He did - and your response was to try and twist the fact that Sterling is being discontinued as a brand - which is an economic decision, probably largely due to marketing and having duplicative brands/products - into something else entirely different, into evidence that there was a quality problem with the product. Nothing in what you quoted (other than some CB chatter apparently) supports that contention.
It's this kind of fantasy of "X" must mean "Y" that gets you into trouble David - you draw conclusions about many things that certainly could
possibly be true, but
aren't necessarily true - and the "facts" that you cite often do not support your conculsions.
Beyond that, when someone does actually point out the above, rather than admitting to being in error, the likelihood is that you will:
A. Never respond, or
B. Disappear for awhile until the incident is forgotten.
Like I said previously (in somewhat different terms), in that thread that is no longer around .... some folks have a problem with accepting the fact they themselves might fallible ..... and so can never admit an error.