Yes, fear is a survival instinct. Fight or flight. But it's usually a fear to fight or flight from something specific, not something imagined. A nervous animal may jump at a sudden noise without knowing what the noise is, but the noise itself is very real, not imagined. You don't see deer suddenly jumping up and running away because there might maybe possibly could be a hunter nearby next Thursday in this very spot merely because there was one right here when deer ol' grandma was a doe.
What are you afraid of? Certainly nothing specific. You are afraid that Obama will create the worse possible scenario. OK, now what are you gonna do about it? You gonna stay afraid, or are you gonna prepare for the worst? The other option, crazy as it may seem, is to wait and see what he does when he's in office, see how he handles things, see what kinds of decisions he makes, see which direction he goes on some issues.
You've taken the gibberish I wrote and illustrated nearly all if it in this post. Historical square pegs into modern day round holes. You compare the Obama and Congress of today with the FDR and Congress of yesterday, and jump to the conclusion that these are not different times and that the circumstances are the same. They're not. The world at large is very different, as is our place in it. Just because there are similarities does not mean they are the same, nor is the outcome even close to certain. The "Jew in Nazi Germany" is a particularly glaring example of how fear can make one take a bad historical correlation and apply it out of context in a different time. The Jews had real reason to be afraid. The danger was not imagined, if was staring them in the face. With Obama, it is all still an unknown. People think they know, people say they know, but they don't know.
Yes, Obama may be the kind of leader who ruins us all. He also may very well be the kind of leader, along with those who control Congress, who has the ability to overcome all of this in grand fashion. Since we really have no idea what kind of leader he will be, it's a little silly to speculate out of fear, or hope, either way.
But not to put too fine a point on it, the only history of Obama's leadership we can draw on, thus far, is the way he ran his campaign, how me managed to stay focused, how me managed to crush the Clinton Machine to get there, how he managed to raise an unprecedented amount of campaign financing, and how he managed to rally enough votes to get him elected. That doesn't sound like an inept leader who would lead the country into ruin.
You can vote very radically in the State Legislature, and in Congress, as Obama certainly did, but unless you set out from the beginning to fail, you cannot govern from the radical perspective. Obama knows that, and if he ever forgets it, he'll have Rahm Emmanuel to keep him centered, because both Emmanuel and Obama know fully well that the country is still right of center on most social issues (the black and Latino breakdown votet in California on Prop 8 just screams volumnes), and Emmanual knows all too well that if Obama gets too far to the left it won't be good for the country, and absolutely bad for the Democratic Party. Choosing Emmanuel for Chief of Staff let those in Congress who would try to do so, that they cannot get wild and crazy with their legislation merely because there's a Democrat in the Big Chair. It's nearly a lock (my opinion, take it for what it's worth) that he'll choose Republican Richard Lugar as Secretary of State, and for very good reasons. Among many, it's to let the radical liberals of the world know the same thing.
Watch him with a critical eye, but don't watch him through cracked lenses, cause you can't see clearly through those. He hasn't even taken the oath of office and you have him utterly destroying the country. Yet as president-elect he's already made some very smart and prudent decisions. I'm willing to let him actually get in office before I pass judgment on what he might or might not do, however. But, hey, if you feel better living in fear of the unknown, more power to ya. That way you can get a clear jump on becoming one of those people, excuse me, victims, who get to blame somebody else for everything that's wrong with their lives. (OK, that was a joke. But it was to make a point. Think about it. It's not that far off. If you're not careful you could end up the flip side of that mentality and become <gasp> disenfranchised).
I sure will be glad when January 20th comes, though. That way I'll have someone to blame for this slowdown in expedited freight, as well as for it not picking back up quickly enough.