Might EOBR's Mean Overtime Pay for Drivers?

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
A petition has surfaced on change.org that reads as follows:

The FLSA exemption for trucking, exempting interstate truck drivers from overtime wages is as old as the driver daily records (log book) regulations that have been rewritten in the last few years.

The exemption was a political move to appease big business trucking, as they used the claim that when trucks are out on a trip they cannot track a drivers work and break times to substantiate any kind of hourly pay for non- driving times or track their driving hours in excess of the basic 40 hour work week.

These arguments will become mute with the requirement for electronic on board recorders that will track ALL ON DUTY HOURS, and show the employer ALL work hours.

In as much as the exemption was and is at the discretion of the Secretary of Transportation, we hereby petition the Secretary to withdraw that exemption immediately upon the effective date of any rule mandating the installation and use of on board recording devices and or electronic driver records.


Time will tell if this gains any traction. It would be an interesting turn of events if it does. Big carriers are all for EOBR's. They may quickly change their tune if it turns out that EOBR's provide the justification and requirement for paying employee drivers overtime.
 
Last edited:

paullud

Veteran Expediter
I hope it picks up steam, the ATA will be talking out of both sides of their mouths.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using EO Forums mobile app
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
I think that if the feds insist on putting a time clock in my truck, that makes me their employee - and I want in on the retirement & insurance bennies! :mad:
 

moose

Veteran Expediter
won't work.
punch 'on duty'. go in have a shower.
an EOBR can't track 'on duty' time.
 

zorry

Veteran Expediter
I kind if like our local cabinet makers theory.
You leave at Sunday 2300 and return noon Friday. Gone 109 hrs. Paid 109 hrs. Simple. Employees. Forced dispatch. Doesn't push his guys.
Nalco Chemical pays their drivers hourly so they take their time and drive safely.
UPS pays their road drivers hourly. At 50+ cpm for unionized drivers it must save them Money.
When my father ran hourly union drivers his theory was it was cheaper to run 2 drivers 60 hrs per week than 3 at 40 hrs per week. The OT was cheaper than the cost of benefits.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I think that if the feds insist on putting a time clock in my truck, that makes me their employee - and I want in on the retirement & insurance bennies! :mad:


Let's see, as a federal employee I paid 60% of the cost of my health care plan. I paid 7% of my wages into a bankrupt retirement plan and did not get any credit with Social Security for all those years I was employed by the Feds.

We were paid sub-standard wages and during the Carter years we were losing almost 20% a year off our wages due to promotion freezes, etc. GOOD DEAL!
 

paullud

Veteran Expediter
Let's see, as a federal employee I paid 60% of the cost of my health care plan. I paid 7% of my wages into a bankrupt retirement plan and did not get any credit with Social Security for all those years I was employed by the Feds.

We were paid sub-standard wages and during the Carter years we were losing almost 20% a year off our wages due to promotion freezes, etc. GOOD DEAL!

Take a look at the problems ntimevan had at the Post Office, I'll take a state job though.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using EO Forums mobile app
 
Top