greg334
Veteran Expediter
I just got another intelligible email from the DNC. It seems that they want one of the candidates to step down now. Howard Dean is making a determination which candidate can win against McCain, he wants the other one to step down but he won't say which one.
It is great to see them in meltdown mode and the people who think they voted for a president actually are starting to realize their vote is not binding with the party. I already heard on one radio station the dumbest thing I ever heard "we are going to sue the federal govment because we didn't have our votes counted and the republicans are going to steal another lection"
Needless to say this is coming from one of the suburbs here in the area and the guy who made the comment does not understand that his vote never counted - it is a primary.
Now I know there are a lot here that will vote demcratic, don't know why the party is in a mess, the candidates are either Socialist or Fascist and the party will pick the candidate they want to back, no voting required. See the thing is, I maybe wrong about this but I am seeing that what ever process we have gone through thus far means nothing. All this wrangling over voting, over delegates, what superdelegates mean and all that other stuff means nothing. When it comes down to it, the party will decide without any votes counted or deligets heard from.
So I ask, if this goes the way I think it is going to go, why did we have a primary in the first place?
Isn't it time that we return to the way the parties picked the candidates, by themselves within the party?
It is great to see them in meltdown mode and the people who think they voted for a president actually are starting to realize their vote is not binding with the party. I already heard on one radio station the dumbest thing I ever heard "we are going to sue the federal govment because we didn't have our votes counted and the republicans are going to steal another lection"
Needless to say this is coming from one of the suburbs here in the area and the guy who made the comment does not understand that his vote never counted - it is a primary.
Now I know there are a lot here that will vote demcratic, don't know why the party is in a mess, the candidates are either Socialist or Fascist and the party will pick the candidate they want to back, no voting required. See the thing is, I maybe wrong about this but I am seeing that what ever process we have gone through thus far means nothing. All this wrangling over voting, over delegates, what superdelegates mean and all that other stuff means nothing. When it comes down to it, the party will decide without any votes counted or deligets heard from.
So I ask, if this goes the way I think it is going to go, why did we have a primary in the first place?
Isn't it time that we return to the way the parties picked the candidates, by themselves within the party?