Not sure once again about the panther reference.
Panther has a plethora of rules that were created because of one rare or very uncommon instance, that sound good and feel good but aren't really thought through with regards to efficacy or unintended consequences. The result is a really lot of really stupid rules that end up getting enforced because they are rules and rules must be enforced. A requirement that drivers of non-CMVs create a DVIR screams of that process.
BUT....like most the app enhancements it was actually initiated by a driver. He observed that some van drivers didn’t really take the time to pre trip their vehicles.
A Hall Monitor. Got it.
We looked at with safety and determined it was an easy add and would hopefully help to remind drivers to inspect equipment.
A feel-good rule if I ever saw one. It doesn't burden Safety in any way, that doesn't really accomplish anything, but makes people in Safety think it does.
In the event of a lawsuit it also shows that we promote safety as a company.
Has lack of DVIRs for non-CMVs been a particular problem in the past? Or is it more of a case of feel-good fixing things that aren't broken?
It should only require it on days you are in service and available.
It does. But it also requires the pre-trip inspection to be performed and the report created even on days when there is no trip to pre-inspect.
No defects takes a few seconds to complete. This post took longer than two weeks of no defect reports ♂
You're really going to try and rationalize the wasting of someone else's seconds? How about awarding 50 Gold Rewards Points for each non-CMV no-defect DVIR that gets submitted. That would at least attach some value to those seconds that others disregard as being so inconsequential as to be wasted.