idiot

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
Respect
Senator Barack Obama, Governor Bill Richardson, Senator Hillary Clinton and Ruth Harkin stand during the national anthem.
Barack Hussein Obama's photo (that's his real name)......the article said he REFUSED TO NOT ONLY PUT HIS HAND ON HIS HEART DURING THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, BUT REFUSED TO SAY THE PLEDGE.....how in the ##### can a man like this expect to be our next Commander-in-Chief????

















Davekc
owner
23 years
PantherII
EO moderator
 

Black Sheep

Expert Expediter
He probably doesn't know the words. At any rate, it's no wonder Hillary's got such a commanding lead in the polls if this clown is her strongest competition.
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
That was my thoughts. Wouldn't be surprised if Hillary picks this guy for a running mate.










Davekc
owner
23 years
PantherII
EO moderator
 

letzrockexpress

Veteran Expediter
I have to say that picture looks like it was fabricated via photoshop or some other photography enhancement program. Look at each of the candidates feet. They all look like they have been superimposed. Bill Richardson looks totally superimposed in front of the flag.
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
Don't know... maybe I could tell with a microscope! LOL

Regardless, it was in the news Osamabama didn't do the deed Senators should do during the national anthem. At least Hillary does her best to hide her hatred of her country. Guess we have to find out which country Osamabama considers his.

-True independence can only be gained if you're trully independant.
 

letzrockexpress

Veteran Expediter
T-Hawk,
How do you come to the conclusion that Hillary hates her country? Is it simply because you don't agree with her? Show me how she has demonstrated that she hates her country. You sound like the alter ego of the "move on" group. You may not agree with what she says, I don't agree with her most of the time, but to say she hates her country? There are more ways than one to get downtown my friend...
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
Lets put it this way... she hates democracy, she hates capitalism unless she's profitting from it, she hates the Constitution unless it fits her agenda, she hates ppl being independant from the government, and she loves power. Well... maybe I was wrong. She loves the country so much, she wants it to be socialist.

-True independence can only be gained if you're trully independant.
 

theoldprof

Veteran Expediter
Regardless of what each one of us thinks about each others' views and the positions of the candidates, isn't it great that we just argue and vote our preferences rather than killing each other like people in many countries do? America is great!!!

:+ :+
 

copdsux

Veteran Expediter
Charter Member
Meaning of idiot: uneducated or ignorant; from the Old French, idoite.

Obama's education: B.A. in international studies 1983, Columbia Univ.
J.D. from Harvard Law. Editor of Harvard Law Review.

Me thinks he is far from being an idiot!
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
Naw... he's very ignorant of the fact that the majority of the country doesn't see things his way, doesn't want what he wants for the country, and doesn't want him as president. He should kindly get out of the way and let Comrade Clinton lead the charge into oblivion. :7

-True independence can only be gained if you're trully independant.
 

buckeyewildman

Seasoned Expediter
being book smart don,t mean a thing when you don,t have common sense which he and Hilary both seem to be lacking hence IDIOT
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
He's an idiot. I have a lot of reasons for saying that, but adding that there is no democrat on the stage that is worth being president.

The picture is not doctored, I seen three different pictures and a video all showing the same thing, the one from the Reuters seemed to be the best. The thing is he should show the basic respect for the country and the people he wants to lead, whether he believes in it or not. People are simple minded and pictures mean more to people who vote than the repetitive "look what my opponent did/said but I won't tell you what I will do" rhetoric. He, like the others have not come up with a thing that they stand on other than the BS of getting out of Iraq, which they are lying about - they can do that now.

Also I am getting sick of this statement "'X' is not 'intelligent/smart enough/good enough/experienced' enough to be president". Usually the Word 'Bush' is used followed by 'intelligent' but the idea that we need a lawyer to lead us, lawyers don't lead. Passing judgment on what others can or can not do really does not matter and pretty much no one really should worry about it, the job of president should be open to any and all Americans.
 

letzrockexpress

Veteran Expediter
Greg, I agree with you on the " Look what our opponent did/did not do but we don't have the answer either" thing. Isn't that what happens on this forum though with many of the posters?? There are several here, you for one, who post constructive answers to actual problems, even though they are usually ,in my opinion, wrong. Then there are those like the "12th man" who just generically attack candidates based solely on their party affiliations with no real substance or stated purpose. I think some people just find it fashionable to bash one side or the other.By the way, I haven't heard any comments on Joe Biden for president. I really feel he is the most qualified candidate in the entire field, hands down. He has a real plan for the future and he explains it whenever asked. I don't know why he isn't catching on...
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
12th man, huh? One thing I've learned... ppl already have made up their minds. I don't try to change them anymore, so I don't need to come out full guns blazing with this, that, or the other. If you don't see the facts with the candidates, then it's obvious you're drinking from the wrong trough.

I don't have the political mind I did a few years ago. I don't have the interest to be swamped by garbage from Washington insiders. And I find that I'm a much happier man since I've backed off. But I do listen in moderation. I do hear the soundbites you don't hear on Communist News Network.

I'm just as happy letting the sheep to fall in line for the party sheepdogs, then watch the candidates switch gears to appear more moderate. Don't matter who makes it, cause we're falling into the trap of UN ruling over us. Just would rather have a little more fight before the Constitution is placed in the shredder. If Hillary gets in.... GAME OVER, MAN! GAME OVER!

And as far as bashing... it's quite a different story when it comes from the "moveon.org" crowd when pertaining to the right. Bah bah bah.

-True independence can only be gained if you're trully independant.
 

letzrockexpress

Veteran Expediter
T-hawk, This is about the third post where you say something to the effect that if Hillary gets in bad things are going to happen. I wish you would explain what YOU mean by that. Though I am not one of her supporters,I can't really see where she could possibly be nearly as bad as what we have now...
 

letzrockexpress

Veteran Expediter
>Also I am getting sick of this statement "'X' is not 'intelligent/smart enough/good enough/experienced' enough to be president". Usually the Word 'Bush' is used followed by 'intelligent' but the idea that we need a lawyer to lead us, lawyers don't lead. Passing judgment on what others can or can not do really does not matter and pretty much no one really should worry about it, the job of president should be open to any and all Americans.<

Appently former baseball team owners don't lead either...not very well anyhow.:)
 

Tennesseahawk

Veteran Expediter
>T-hawk, This is about the third post where you say something
>to the effect that if Hillary gets in bad things are going
>to happen. I wish you would explain what YOU mean by that.
>Though I am not one of her supporters,I can't really see
>where she could possibly be nearly as bad as what we have
>now...

Letzrock... it's a combination of what she says and what she doesn't say. With quotes like "I have so many ideas, we just don't have the money for all of them" should scare the shiite out of anyone. And with the last debate... she couldn't answer the hard questions that a front runner would be expected to do. No... instead, she cries gender bias and says everyone's beating up on the woman. I applaud Obama for calling her out on that one, and stating he didn't play the race card because someone disagreed with his philosophy.

Which is it, Hillary? Do you have the mettle to be president? Or do you back off when confronted by big scary men who ask you the HARD questions? I think it's the latter. Therefore, I suggest Ann Coulter ask her a list of questions. Then she'd have no defense.

I've got an assumption of what Hillary is like, based on what other ppl say. And I don't take that lightly being that the ppl who said it worked for her and with her. I'll finish my thought later... they got me moving. :)

-True independence can only be gained if you're trully independant.
 
Top